Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 3926941, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3926941
Research Article

Influence of Trabecular Bone on Peri-Implant Stress and Strain Based on Micro-CT Finite Element Modeling of Beagle Dog

1School of Information Science and Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China
2Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, China

Received 10 December 2015; Accepted 22 May 2016

Academic Editor: Paul C. Dechow

Copyright © 2016 Sheng-hui Liao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. M. Cattaneo, M. Dalstra, and B. Melsen, “Analysis of stress and strain around orthodontically loaded implants: An Animal Study,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 213–225, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. X. Yan, X. Zhang, J. Gao et al., “Maxillary sinus augmentation without grafting material with simultaneous implant installation: a three-dimensional finite element analysis,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 515–524, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. D. Özdemir Doğan, N. T. Polat, S. Polat, E. Şeker, and E. B. Gül, “Evaluation of ‘all-on-four’ concept and alternative designs with 3D finite element analysis method,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 501–510, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. V. A. R. Barão, J. A. Delben, J. Lima, T. Cabral, and W. G. Assunção, “Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible—a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 1312–1320, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. X. Ding, S.-H. Liao, X.-H. Zhu, and H.-M. Wang, “Influence of orthotropy on biomechanics of peri-implant bone in complete mandible model with full dentition,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 709398, 12 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S.-H. Liao, R.-F. Tong, and J.-X. Dong, “Influence of anisotropy on peri-implant stress and strain in complete mandible model from CT,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. X. Ding, S.-H. Liao, X.-H. Zhu, X.-H. Zhang, and L. Zhang, “Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants,” Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 279–287, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Matsunaga, Y. Shirakura, T. Ohashi et al., “Biomechanical role of peri-implant cancellous bone architecture,” The International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 333–338, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Ohashi, S. Matsunaga, K. Nakahara et al., “Biomechanical role of peri-implant trabecular structures during vertical loading,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 507–513, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. S. V. N. Jaecques, H. Van Oosterwyck, L. Muraru et al., “Individualised, micro CT-based finite element modelling as a tool for biomechanical analysis related to tissue engineering of bone,” Biomaterials, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1683–1696, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Takada, S. Abe, Y. Tamatsu, S. Mitarashi, H. Saka, and Y. Ide, “Three-dimensional bone microstructures of the mandibular angle using micro-CT and finite element analysis: relationship between partially impacted mandibular third molars and angle fractures,” Dental Traumatology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Matsunaga, H. Okudera, S. Abe, Y. Tamatsu, M. Hashimoto, and Y. Ide, “The influence of bite force on the internal structure of the mandible through implant—three-dimensional and mechanical analysis using micro-CT and finite element method,” Journal of Oral Biosciences, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 194–199, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. X. S. Liu, J. Wang, B. Zhou et al., “Fast trabecular bone strength predictions of HR-pQCT and individual trabeculae segmentation-based plate and rod finite element model discriminate postmenopausal vertebral fractures,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1666–1678, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. Stegaroiu, N. Watanabe, M. Tanaka, S. Ejiri, S. Nomura, and O. Miyakawa, “Peri-implant stress analysis in simulation models with or without trabecular bone structure,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 40–42, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Wolff, N. Narra, A.-K. Antalainen et al., “Finite element analysis of bone loss around failing implants,” Materials and Design, vol. 61, pp. 177–184, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. Huiskes, R. Rulmerman, G. H. Van Lenthe, and J. D. Janssen, “Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone,” Nature, vol. 405, no. 6787, pp. 704–706, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Limbert, C. van Lierde, O. L. Muraru et al., “Trabecular bone strains around a dental implant and associated micromotions-a micro-CT-based three-dimensional finite element study,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1251–1261, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. W. C. H. Parr, U. Chamoli, A. Jones, W. R. Walsh, and S. Wroe, “Finite element micro-modelling of a human ankle bone reveals the importance of the trabecular network to mechanical performance: new methods for the generation and comparison of 3D models,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 200–205, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. Y. Boykov and G. Funka-Lea, “Graph cuts and efficient N-D image segmentation,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 109–131, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Ulrich, T. Hildebrand, B. Van Rietbergen, R. Müller, and P. Rüegsegger, “The quality of trabecular bone evaluated with micro-computed tomography, FEA and mechanical testing,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 40, pp. 97–112, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  21. R. Muller and P. Ruegsegger, “Micro-tomographic imaging for the nondestructive evaluation of trabecular bone architecture,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 40, pp. 61–79, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Torcasio, X. Zhang, H. Van Oosterwyck, J. Duyck, and G. H. Van Lenthe, “Use of micro-CT-based finite element analysis to accurately quantify peri-implant bone strains: a validation in rat tibiae,” Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 743–750, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. K. Boyd, R. Müller, and R. F. Zernicke, “Mechanical and architectural bone adaptation in early stage experimental osteoarthritis,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 687–694, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. B. van Rietbergen, H. Weinans, R. Huiskes, and A. Odgaard, “A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 69–81, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. E. Verhulp, B. Van Rietbergen, R. Müller, and R. Huiskes, “Micro-finite element simulation of trabecular-bone post-yield behaviour—effects of material model, element size and type,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 389–395, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Homminga, B. Van-Rietbergen, E. M. Lochmüller, H. Weinans, F. Eckstein, and R. Huiskes, “The osteoporotic vertebral structure is well adapted to the loads of daily life, but not to infrequent ‘error’ loads,” Bone, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 510–516, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. H. Kiba, T. Hayakawa, S. Oba, M. Kuwabara, I. Habata, and H. Yamamoto, “Potential application of high-resolution microfocus X-ray techniques for observation of bone structure and bone-implant interface,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 279–285, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. Sennerby, A. Wennerberg, and F. Pasop, “A new microtomographic technique for non-invasive evaluation of the bone structure around implants,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 91–94, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Jung, H.-J. Kim, S. Hong et al., “Osseointegration assessment of dental implants using a synchrotron radiation imaging technique: a preliminary study,” International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 121–126, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. N. Natali, E. L. Carniel, and P. G. Pavan, “Dental implants press fit phenomena: biomechanical analysis considering bone inelastic response,” Dental Materials, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 573–581, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus