Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4062390, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4062390
Clinical Study

Transperitoneal Subcostal Access for Urologic Laparoscopy: Experience of a Large Chinese Center

Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Beijing 100034, China

Received 5 August 2016; Revised 5 October 2016; Accepted 24 October 2016

Academic Editor: Nevzat C. Şener

Copyright © 2016 Lei Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. W. Jansen, W. Kolkman, E. A. Bakkum, C. D. De Kroon, T. C. M. Trimbos-Kemper, and J. B. Trimbos, “Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed-versus open-entry technique,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 190, no. 3, pp. 634–638, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Palmer, “Safety in laparoscopy,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. M. Childers, P. R. Brzechffa, and E. A. Surwit, “Laparoscopy using the left upper quadrant as the primary trocar site,” Gynecologic Oncology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 221–225, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. F. H. Chang, C. L. Lee, and Y. K. Soon, “Use of Palmer's point for insertion of the operative laparoscope in patients with severe pelvic adhesions: experience of seventeen cases,” The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, vol. 1, no. 2, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. Parker, G. Reid, and F. Wong, “Microlaparoscopic left upper quadrant entry in patients at high risk of periumbilical adhesions,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 88–92, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Patsner, “Laparoscopy using the left upper quadrant approach,” Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 323–325, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H.-J. Chung, M. V. Meng, H. M. Abrahams, and M. L. Stoller, “Upper quadrant access for urologic laparoscopy,” Urology, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 1117–1119, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. P. K. Tulikangas, D. S. Robinson, and T. Falcone, “Left upper quadrant cannula insertion,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 411–412, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. I. Tüfek, H. Akpinar, C. Sevinç, and A. R. Kural, “Primary left upper quadrant (Palmer's point) access for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy,” Urology Journal, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 152–156, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Granata, I. Tsimpanakos, F. Moeity, and A. Magos, “Are we underutilizing Palmer's point entry in gynecologic laparoscopy?” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 94, no. 7, pp. 2716–2719, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. E. Richardson and C. J. G. Sutton, “Complications of first entry: a prospective laparoscopy audit,” Gynaecological Endoscopy, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 327–334, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Preventing entry-related gynaecological laparoscopic injuries: Green-top Guideline No. 49, London, UK, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 2008.
  13. T. L. Merlin, J. E. Hiller, G. J. Maddern, G. G. Jamieson, A. R. Brown, and A. Kolbe, “Systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 668–679, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Mintz, “Risks and prophylaxis in laparoscopy: a survey of 100,000 cases,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 269–272, 1977. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. H. Saidi, T. G. Vancaillie, A. J. White, R. K. Sadler, B. D. Akright, and S. A. Farhart, “Complications of major operative laparoscopy: a review of 452 cases,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 471–476, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Champault, F. Cazacu, and N. Taffinder, “Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations,” Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 367–370, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. I. Brill, F. Nezhat, C. H. Nezhat, and C. Nezhat, “The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 269–272, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. M. Giannios, V. Gulani, K. Rohlck, R. L. Flyckt, S. J. Weil, and W. W. Hurd, “Left upper quadrant laparoscopic placement: effects of insertion angle and body mass index on distance to posterior peritoneum by magnetic resonance imaging,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 201, no. 5, pp. 522.e1–522.e5, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus