Research Article

Evaluation of Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation in Manikin Studies: What Are the Current Limitations?

Table 2

Characteristics of study population ().

Mean age ± SD (years)37.28 ± 8.97
Sex (, %)
 Female47 (33.57%)
 Male93 (66.43%)
Professional category (, %)
 Physicians45 (32.14%)
 Nurses45 (32.14%)
 First-aid workers50 (35.71%)
Professional experience (, %)
 High (≥10 years)63 (45.00%)
 Medium (5 ≤ < 10 years)36 (25.70%)
 Little (<5 years)41 (29.30%)
Handedness (, %)
 Right-handed118 (84.29%)
 Left-handed14 (10.00%)
 Ambidextrous8 (5.71%)
Size of the hand squeezing the bag (, %)
 Large (≥23 cm)21 (15.00%)
 Medium (19 ≤ < 23 cm)101 (72.14%)
 Small (15 ≤ < 19 cm)18 (12.86%)
Grip strength (, %)
Hand squeezing the bag
 High (≥40 kgF)53 (37.90%)
 Medium (20 ≤ < 40 kgF)65 (46.40%)
 Weak (0 ≤ < 20 kgF)22 (15.70%)
Hand keeping the mask
 High (≥40 kgF)38 (27.70%)
 Medium (20 ≤ < 40 kgF)68 (49.60%)
 Weak (0 ≤ < 20 kgF) 31 (22.60%)
BVM type used frequently (, %)
 Ambu®76 (54.29%)
 Laerdal®3 (2.14%)
 Both39 (27.86%)
 Neither22 (15.71%)
Estimated manual ventilation performance (, %)
 Good55 (39.57%)
 Medium83 (59.71%)
 Bad1 (0.72%)

SD: standard deviation; 3 missing values; 1 missing value.