Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 4530846, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4530846
Research Article

Molecular Identification of Sex in Phoenix dactylifera Using Inter Simple Sequence Repeat Markers

Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia

Received 23 January 2016; Accepted 5 May 2016

Academic Editor: Tariq Ezaz

Copyright © 2016 Abdulhafed A. Al-Ameri et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Early sex identification of Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) at seedling stage is an economically desirable objective, which will significantly increase the profits of seed based cultivation. The utilization of molecular markers at this stage for early and rapid identification of sex is important due to the lack of morphological markers. In this study, a total of two hundred Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) primers were screened among male and female Date palm plants to identify putative sex-specific marker, out of which only two primers (IS_A02 and IS_A71) were found to be associated with sex. The primer IS_A02 produced a unique band of size 390 bp and was found clearly in all female plants, while it was absent in all male plants. Contrary to this, the primer IS_A71 produced a unique band of size 380 bp and was clearly found in all male plants, whereas it was absent in all the female plants. Subsequently, these specific fragments were excised, purified, and sequenced for the development of sequence specific markers further in future for the implementation on dioecious Date Palm for sex determination. These markers are efficient, highly reliable, and reproducible for sex identification at the early stage of seedling.

1. Introduction

Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L., Arecaceae family) () is a long living dioecious monocotyledon, which is cultivated in arid zones for food, fiber, and shelter [1, 2]. The Arab countries account for 60 percent of the world’s production with approximately 800 different kinds of date cultivars [3], which makes Palm tree the major plantation crop in Arab world [4].

The sexual propagation of Date Palm results in seedlings variation which may be different from the mother tree and among them in fruit quality, production potential, and harvesting time. However, the high genetic variability among the offspring may lead to better characteristics for their survival in the natural habitat (e.g., disease resistance) or in their quality [5]. Unfortunately, the sex of individual Date Palm plants cannot be determined until they reach reproductive age, between five and ten years old [6]. This significantly increases the cost of cultivating dates from seeds, as only the female plants bear fruit. A reliable method of early detection of Date Palm sex would significantly increase the profits of seed based cultivation [7].

In the last two decades, there have been serious efforts to understand the basis of sex identification in Date Palm and to develop methods of identifying the sex at an early stage of seedlings. Several types of markers such as biochemical and molecular markers are available for the identification of male and female dioecious crop plants at early stage of development and proved to be beneficial [8]. Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) marker is a simple, easy, and quick assay to perform and offers several advantages over other dominant markers and thus has been adopted widely for plant genome analysis [9, 10]. This marker system has rarely been used for sex identification in dioecious plants [1114].

Until now, the research is limited in the field of sex identification in the germinated seeds of Date Palm cultivars in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. There are not enough reproducible markers available for the sex identification in case of Date Palm. Therefore, this research aimed to develop molecular markers for early sex identification at seedling stage through comparative study of male and female Date Palm plants using ISSR and SSR molecular markers.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Plant Collection

Leaf samples of ten pairs of different male and female Date Palm cultivars were collected from Al-Rajhi Farm (Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia) and directly stored at −80°C (Table 1).

Table 1: Date palm cultivars collected from Al-Rajhi farm (Al-Qassim, Saudi Arabia).
2.2. Genomic DNA Extraction and PCR Reaction

A modified CTAB (cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide) procedure based on the protocol of Khan et al. [15] was adopted for obtaining good quality and quantity of genomic DNA. Concentration and purity of extracted DNA were determined by Nanodrop 8000 spectrophotometer. The DNA samples were diluted to a working concentration (20–25 ng/μL) for PCR amplification. Screening of primers was carried out using bulk analysis by pooling genomic DNA from ten male and female plants separately (Table 1).

2.3. ISSR Marker Profiling

Two hundred ISSR oligonucleotides (Macrogen Inc., Korea) composed of short tandem repeat sequences with anchor and representing different microsatellites (di- and trirepeats) have been used as generic primers in PCR amplification. PCR was performed in 25 μL reaction using PCR bead (GE healthcare, UK) supplied with all PCR components except primers and DNA. The reaction mixture contained 50 ng DNA and 20 pmol primer for amplification in PCR. The reactions were performed in Applied Biosystems Veriti Thermal Cycler with an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 minutes, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 1 minute; annealing temperatures were optimized according to primer (Table 2) for 1 min and extension at 72°C for 1.5 minutes. The final extension step was at 72°C for 7 minutes.

Table 2: Sex-specific ISSR primers and their features.
2.4. Sex-Specific Band Selection and Sequencing

The primers showing unique bands in bulked samples were further used with separate male and female Date Palm samples (seven each). The DNA marker that was present in corresponding male or female samples and absent in the alternate sex samples was recognized as a potential sex-linked marker. The candidate sex-linked markers were then eluted from agarose gel using Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was carried out using the same primers as applied for unique marker amplification (Macrogen Inc., Korea).

3. Results and Discussion

In various economically important plants, such as Date Palm, the female plants produce the dates which have socioeconomic value [16]. Knowledge about the sex of the Date Palm seedlings prior to their transplantation in the field can be of great agronomic potential to make best use of the available resources, especially land usage [17]. In this work, the simple and reproducible ISSR markers were used to identify sex-specific DNA markers to identify date palm sex at seedling stage. Two hundred ISSR primers were used in PCR with genomic DNA of male and female Date Palm. Out of them, two putative sex-linked primers, that is, IS_A02 and IS_A71, gave sex-specific banding pattern (Table 2), while other remaining primers amplified fragments which were not present exclusively either in male or female.

The above low outcome could result from insignificant differences in X and Y chromosome sequences [18] and the limited number of bands generated by ISSR primers [19]. Therefore, without the luck factor, one could test hundreds of primers with no results. Twenty-two ISSR primers were used in Humulus lupulus L. and found two male-specific band sequences [11], whereas 80 ISSR primers were used in Simmondsia chinensis and found two male-specific band sequences [20].

The primer IS_A02 amplified unique band of size 390 bp in the female, whereas similar fragment was absent in the male in bulk samples. On the contrary, the primer IS_A71 amplified the band of size 380 bp which was unique in the male, while it is consistently absent in the female bulk samples. These results were further validated on seven females (different cultivars) and male plant samples separately and their reproducibility was proven through the same PCR reaction conditions (Figures 1(a)-1(b)).

Figure 1: ISSR marker profile for seven pairs of female and male cultivars using the primers (a) IS_A02 and (b) IS_A71. (M: 100 bp DNA ladder).

In this context, only few studies were conducted using ISSR markers to evaluate sex discrimination in dioecious plant species. Sarmah and Sarma [21] screened 30 ISSR primers in Calamus tenuis and found only one female-associated marker. Aleksandrov et al. [13] screened 36 primers in Humulus japonicus, and found only one male-linked marker. Nanda et al. [12] and Korpelainen et al. [22] used 40 primers and found one male-specific marker in Trichosanthes dioica and one female-specific marker in Pseudocalliergon trifarium, respectively. Sharma et al. [23] obtained one male-specific DNA fragment after screening a total of 42 primers in Simmondsia chinensis.

Furthermore, the sequences of the identified putative sex-linked markers were investigated in order to identify the genome segments unique to male or female plant. The generated sequence of putative female-specific fragment of size 212 bp (GC content = 34.4%; A = 79, T = 60, G = 34, and C = 39) (Figure 2(a)) was obtained with primer IS_A02, while the complete generated sequence of putative male-specific fragment of size 310 bp (GC content = 35.2%; A = 101, T = 100, G = 49, and C = 60) was obtained with primer IS_A71 (Figure 2(b)). The generated sequences were submitted at GenBank database of National Centre for Biological Information (NCBI) (Accession Number IS_A02, (KU323794); IS_A71 (KU323795)). These sequences did not show any homology to the other taxa at GenBank database (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). These observations were expected due to the usage of random molecular markers (i.e., ISSR) to identify genomic sex linked tags, which are usually from the genomic sites controlling the associated trait and not part of the gene(s) [17].

Figure 2: The sequence of (a) the female-specific marker IS_A02 and (b) the male-specific marker IS_A71.

The outcome of this study proves to be ideal for sex identification especially in experiments where the absence of a PCR product in the sample could be a false negative result due to the lack of DNA in the sample or other obstacles in the PCR process [18]. Therefore, it is preferable to use one or two different sex-linked markers to amplify products of different lengths in males and females in the same reaction. In congruence with the aforementioned method, sex-linked markers were developed in Ginkgo biloba by using two different product sizes, one for males at 571 bp and the other for females at 688 bp [24].

4. Conclusion

The screened ISSR primers (IS_A02 and IS_A71) in this study gave reproducible results for the discrimination of male and female Date Palm plants. The generated unique bands from male and female plant were sequenced and could be used further for identification of sex at early stage of seedlings of Date Palm. Further, more specific primers can be designed from these generated sequences which could be used for sex identification of Date Palm in a more precise way at seedling stage. Using such DNA markers would help the farmers maintain the sex ratio of Date Palm in plantation, thus saving the time, effort, and cost by avoiding the cultivation of too many male plants in any ongoing Date Palm breeding programs at an early stage.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding the work through the research group Project no. RGP-014.

References

  1. V. S. Srivashtav, C. V. Kapadia, M. K. Mahatma, S. K. Jha, S. Jha, and T. Ahmad, “Genetic diversity analysis of date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) in the Kutch region of India using RAPD and ISSR markers,” Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 907–915, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. S. Adawy, E. H. A. Hussein, D. El-Khishin, M. M. Saker, A. A. Mohamed, and H. A. El-Itriby, “Genotyping Egyptian date palm cultivars using RAPD, ISSR, AFLP markers and estimation of genetic stability among tissue culture derived plants,” Arab Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 99–114, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  3. L. I. El-Juhany, “Degradation of date palm trees and date production in Arab countries: causes and potential rehabilitation,” Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 3998–4010, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. I. A. Al-Abdoulhadi, S. Al-Ali, K. Khurshid, F. Al-Shryda, A. M. Al-Jabr, and A. B. Abdallah, “Assessing fruit characteristics to standardize quality norms in date cultivars of Saudi Arabia,” Indian Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1262–1266, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Juarez and J. A. Banks, “Sex determination in plants,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 68–72, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. El Hadrami and A. El Hadrami, “Breeding date palm,” in Breeding Plantation Tree Crops: Tropical Species, S. M. Jain and P. M. Priyadarshan, Eds., pp. 191–215, Springer Science Business Media, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. N. S. Al-Khalifah, E. Askari, and A. E. Shanavas Khan, “Molecular and morphological identification of some elite varieties of date palms grown in Saudi Arabia,” Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 456–461, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Heikrujam, K. Sharma, M. Prasad, and V. Agrawal, “Review on different mechanisms of sex determination and sex-linked molecular markers in dioecious crops: a current update,” Euphytica, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 161–194, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A.-R. Z. Gaafar, F. Al-Qurainy, and S. Khan, “Assessment of genetic diversity in the endangered populations of Breonadia salicina (Rubiaceae) growing in The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia using inter-simple sequence repeat markers,” BMC Genetics, vol. 15, article 109, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. L. Abdel-Mawgood, “DNA based techniques for studying genetic diversity,” in Genetic Diversity in Microorganisms, M. Caliskan, Ed., InTech, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Heikrujam, K. Sharma, J. Kumar, and V. Agrawal, “Generation and validation of unique male sex-specific sequence tagged sites (STS) marker from diverse genotypes of dioecious Jojoba-Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider,” Euphytica, vol. 199, no. 3, pp. 363–372, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Nanda, B. Kar, S. Nayak, S. Jha, and R. K. Joshi, “Development of an ISSR based STS marker for sex identification in pointed gourd (Trichosanthes dioica Roxb.),” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 150, pp. 11–15, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. O. S. Aleksandrov, M. G. Divashuk, and G. I. Karlov, “Development of a sex-specific molecular marker for Japanese hop Humulus japonicus Siebold & Zucc,” Russian Journal of Genetics, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1016–1020, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Milewicz and J. Sawicki, “Molecular identification of sex in dioecious moss Nyholmiella obtusifolia (Orthotrichaceae) on the basis of ISSR markers,” Casopis Slezského Zemského Muzea, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Khan, M. I. Qureshi, Kamaluddin, T. Alam, and M. Z. Abdin, “Protocol for isolation of genomic DNA from dry and fresh roots of medicinal plants suitable for RAPD and restriction digestion,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 175–178, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Elmeer and I. Mattat, “Marker-assisted sex differentiation in date palm using simple sequence repeats,” 3 Biotech, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 241–247, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. C. Dhawan, P. Kharb, R. Sharma, S. Uppal, and R. K. Aggarwal, “Development of male-specific SCAR marker in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.),” Tree Genetics & Genomes, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1143–1150, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Milewicz and J. Sawicki, “Sex-linked markers in dioecious plants,” Plant Omics Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 144–149, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  19. X. Liu and G. Yang, “Assessment of clonal fidelity of micro-propagated guava (Psidium guajava) plants by ISSR markers,” Australian Journal of Crop Science, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 291–295, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. Jiang and K. C. Sink, “RAPD and SCAR markers linked to the sex expression locus M in Asparagus,” Euphytica, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 329–333, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Sarmah and R. N. Sarma, “Identification of a DNA marker linked to sex determination in Calamus tenuis Roxb., an economically important rattan species in northeast India,” Molecular Breeding, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 115–118, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. H. Korpelainen, I. Bisang, L. Hedenäs, and J. Kolehmainen, “The first sex-specific molecular marker discovered in the moss Pseudocalliergon trifarium,” Journal of Heredity, vol. 99, no. 6, pp. 581–587, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Sharma, V. Agrawal, S. Gupta, R. Kumar, and M. Prasad, “ISSR marker-assisted selection of male and female plants in a promising dioecious crop: Jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis),” Plant Biotechnology Reports, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 239–243, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. Liao, J. Liu, Y. Dai et al., “Development and application of SCAR markers for sex identification in the dioecious species Ginkgo biloba L.,” Euphytica, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus