Review Article

Cartilage Regeneration in Human with Adipose Tissue-Derived Stem Cells: Current Status in Clinical Implications

Table 1

Clinical studies on ADSC treatments for cartilage defects.

Study (yr)Intervention treatment Study typeNumber of subjects Subject characteristic [age (yr); gender]Previous therapyConcurrent treatmentFollow-up (mo)Outcome measuresResultsAuthors’ conclusion

Pak (2011) [20]Adipose SVF (ADSC) + PRP via percutaneous injectionsCase report270 and 79; 2 F with chronic knee painVarious treatments without any successNone3 VAS; functions (FRI, ROM); MRIVAS/function improvements and MRI evidence of cartilage regenerationADSC + PRP: potentially effective in regenerating cartilage in humans

Koh and Choi (2012) [52]Adipose SVF (ADSC) + PRP via percutaneous injectionsNonrandomized, retrospective, comparative study: ADSC + PRP versus PRP alone25
Study group (ADSC + PRP): 25; control group (PRP alone): 25
Study group: mean 54.1 (range, 34–69); 8 M and 17 F Various treatments without any successNone16.4 VAS; functions (Lysholm, Tegner)ADSC + PRP: more effective than PRP-control groupADSC + PRP: potentially effective in patients with cartilage defects

Pak et al. (2013) [44] Adipose SVF (ADSC) + PRP via percutaneous injectionsRetrospective cohort study91Mean 51.23 ± 1.50 (range, 18–78); 45 M and 46 FVarious treatments without any successNone26.62 ± 0.32 VAS; functionsStatistically significant improvement in both VAS and functionsADSC + PRP: safe and potentially effective

Pak et al. (2013) [47]Adipose SVF (ADSC) + PRP via percutaneous injectionsCase series343 and 63; 2 F
54; 1 M
All with chronic knee pain
Various treatments without any successNone3 VAS; functions (FRI, ROM); MRIVAS/function improvements and MRI evidence of cartilage regenerationADSC + PRP: effective in treating chondromalacia patellae patients

Koh et al. (2013) [53]Adipose SVF (ADSC) + PRP via percutaneous injectionCase series18Mean 54.6; 6 M and 12 FVarious treatments without any successArthroscopic lavage before knee-fat-pad-derived adipose SVF + PRP injection24.3 VAS; functions (WOMAC, Lysholm); MRIVAS/function/MRI improvementsADSC + PRP: effective in treating OA of knees

Koh et al. (2015) [22]Adipose SVF (ADSC) + PRP under arthroscopic guidanceCase series30 for adipose SVF + PRP injection; 16 for second-look arthroscopyMean 70.3 (range, 65–80); 5 M and 25 FVarious treatments without any successArthroscopic lavage before ADSCs + PRP injection24 VAS; functions; 2nd-look arthroscopyVAS/function improvements; improved and maintained cartilage status ADSCs + PRP: effective in treating elderly patients with OA

Pak et al. (2014) [48] Adipose SVF (ADSC) + PRP via percutaneous injectionsCase report132; 1 F with chronic knee pain due to meniscus tearVarious treatments without any successNone3 VAS; functions (FRI, ROM); MRIVAS/function improvements and MRI evidence of cartilage regenerationADSC + PRP: effective in treating cartilage defect lesions, including meniscus tear

Bui et al. (2014) [54]Adipose SVF (ADSC) + PRP via percutaneous injectionsCase series21>18; NDVarious treatments without any successNone8.5 VAS; functions; MRIVAS/function/MRI improvements ADSC + PRP: effective in treating OA of knees

Jo et al. (2014) [21]Culture-expanded ADSC via arthroscopic injections Randomized double-blind dose escalation study (a proof-of-concept clinical trial)1861–65; 3 M and 15 FVarious treatments without any successNone6 VAS; functions; MRI; arthroscopy; histologyVAS/function/MRI/
arthroscopic/histological
improvements
1.0 × 108
ADSCs into the osteoarthritic knee improved function and pain of the knee joint. Radiological,
arthroscopic, and histological measures
demonstrated
regeneration of
hyaline-like articular cartilage

Koh et al. (2014) [23]Adipose SVF (ADSC) + PRP under arthroscopic guidanceCase series35 with 37 knee jointsMean 57.4 (range, 48–69); 14 M and 21 F Various treatments without any successArthroscopic lavage before adipose SVF + PRP injection12.7 VAS; functions; arthroscopy94% patients had excellent clinical improvement; 76% had abnormal repair tissueScaffolds may be needed to treat patients with large cartilage lesions

Koh et al. (2014) [55]Adipose SVF (ADSC) + PRP under arthroscopic guidanceComparative study: adipose SVF + PRP versus PRP only44NDVarious treatments without any successOpen-wedge high tibial osteotomy 24 VAS; functions; arthroscopyAdipose SVF + PRP is more effective than PRP aloneADSC therapy, in conjunction with HTO, mildly improved cartilage healing and showed good clinical results compared with PRP only

Kim et al. (2015) [49]Adipose SVF (ADSC) under arthroscopic guidanceComparative study:
adipose SVF versus adipose SVF + fibrin glue (as a scaffold)
54Mean 57.5 ± 5.8; 22 M and 32 FVarious treatments without any successNone28.6VAS; functions; arthroscopyNo significant differenceClinical and arthroscopic outcomes of ADSC implantation were encouraging for OA knees in both groups, although there were no significant differences in outcome scores between groups

Michalek et al. (2015) [56]Adipose SVF (ADSC) via percutaneous injectionMulticenter case control study1,114Median 62 (range, 19–94); 589 M and 525 FVarious treatments without any successNoneMedian 17.2VAS; functionsVAS/function improvementsAdipose SVF is a novel and promising treatment approach for patients with degenerative OA. ADSC is safe and cost-effective

SVF: stromal vascular fraction; ADSC: adipose tissue-derived stem cells; PRP: platelet rich plasma; OA: osteoarthritis; yr: year; mo: month; M: male; F: female; ND: not described; HTO: high tibial osteotomy; VAS: visual analogue scale; FRI: functional rate index; ROM: range of motion; WOMAC: Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index; Lysholm: Lysholm scores; Tegner: Tegner activity scale.