Review Article
Evaluation of Implant Collar Surfaces for Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 1
Characteristics of studies included (
).
| Author, year | Arch | Study design | Follow-up time | Patients () | Patients’ age | Collar surface characterization | Implants system | Collar | Implants () | MBL (mm) | Survival rate (%) | Diameter (mm2) | Length (mm) | <5 y | 5–10 y | >10 y |
| den Hartog et al. 2013 [3] | Maxilla | RCT | 1 year | 93 | 37.2 ± 12.9 | Machined | Noble Biocare | — | 1.5 | 30 | 1.19 ± 0.82 | — | — | 96.8 | 40.1 ± 14.4 | Rough microthreaded | Noble Biocare | — | — | 31 | 0.90 ± 0.57 | — | — | 100 | 40.1 ± 17.2 | Scalloped microthreaded | Noble Biocare | — | — | 31 | 2.01 ± 0.74 | — | — | 100 |
| Nickenig et al. 2013 [19] | Mandible | RCT | 5 years | 34 | 45.2 | Machined | Noble Biocare | 4.3 | — | 63 | 1.3 | 1.4 | — | — | Rough microthreaded | Noble Biocare | 4 | — | 70 | 0.6 | 0.7 | — | — |
| Sánchez-Siles et al. 2016 [20] | Maxilla Mandible | Retrospective | >10 years | 400 | 53.50 | Machined | BIS Biotech | 3.6/3.9/4.4 | 2.5 | 515 | 1.08 ± 1.27 | 1.12 ± 1.21 | 1.18 ± 1.39 | — | Rough | BIS Biotech | 3.6/3.9/4.4 | — | 729 | 2.63 ± 1.61 | 2.39 ± 1.59 | 2.41 ± 1.35 | — |
| Piao et al. 2009 [21] | Maxilla Mandible | Prospective | 1 year | 54 | 57.6 | Machined | Restore | — | 3 | 45 | 1.38 ± 0.71 | — | — | 100 | Rough | Branemark | — | — | 45 | 1.24 ± 0.36 | — | — | 100 | Rough microthreaded | Hexplant | — | — | 45 | 0.78 ± 0.49 | — | — | 100 |
| Peñarrocha-Diago et al. 2013 [22] | Maxilla Mandible | Prospective | 1 year | 18 | 56.9 | Machined | Osseous | 3.75/4.25 | — | 69 | 0.38 ± 0.51 | — | — | 98.6 | Rough microthreaded | Inhex | 3.75/4.25 | — | 72 | 0.12 ± 0.17 | — | — | 98.6 |
| Karlsson et al. 1998 [23] | Maxilla Mandible | Prospective | 2 years | 50 | 53 | Machined | Astra Tech | 3.5/4 | — | 36 | 0.26 ± 0.81 | — | — | 95.3 | Rough | Astra Tech | 3.5/4 | — | 36 | 0.22 ± 0.55 | — | — | 100 |
| Van de Velde et al. 2010 [24] | Mandible | Prospective | 1 year | 39 | 58.4 | Machined | Branemark | — | — | 70 | 1.52 ± 0.64 | — | — | 98.6 | Rough | Astra Tech | — | — | 75 | 0.80 ± 0.98 | — | — | 100 | Rough microthreaded | Astra Tech | — | — | 50 | 0.81 ± 1.11 | — | — | 100 |
| Bratu et al. 2009 [25] | Mandible | Prospective | 1 year | 46 | 23–65 | Machined | MIS-Implants | 3.75/4.25 | — | 46 | 1.47 ± 0.4 | — | — | 100 | Rough microthreaded | MIS-Implants | 3.75/4.25 | — | 46 | 0.69 ± 0.25 | — | — | 100 |
| Goswami 2009 [26] | Mandible | Prospective | 1 year | 20 | 25–50 | Machined | Oraltronics | — | 2 | 20 | 1.53 ± 0.28 | — | — | — | Rough | Nobel Biocare | — | — | 20 | 1.41 ± 0.35 | — | — | — |
| Shin et al. 2006 [16] | Maxilla Mandible | Prospective | 1 year | 68 | 48 | Machined | Ankylos | — | — | 35 | 1.32 ± 0.27 | — | — | 100 | Rough | Lifecore | — | — | 34 | 0.76 ± 0.21 | — | — | 100 | Rough microthreaded | Oneplant | — | — | 38 | 0.18 ± 0.16 | — | — | 100 |
| Lee et al. 2007 [27] | Maxilla Mandible | Prospective | 3 years | 17 | 53.3 | Rough microthreaded | Astra Tech | 3.5/4 | — | 17 | 0.24 ± 0.13 | — | — | 100 | Rough | Astra Tech | 3.5/4 | — | 17 | 0.51 ± 0.33 | — | — | 100 |
| Puchades-Roman et al. 2000 [28] | Maxilla Mandible | Retrospective | >2 years | 30 | 41.9 | Machined | Astra Tech | — | — | 15 | 1.65 ± (0.26) | — | — | — | 37.3 | Rough | Branemark | — | — | 15 | 0.57 ± (0.28) | — | — | — |
|
|