Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016 (2016), Article ID 5173805, 7 pages
Research Article

Intrapulpal Thermal Changes during Setting Reaction of Glass Carbomer® Using Thermocure Lamp

1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
2Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey

Received 9 June 2016; Revised 13 October 2016; Accepted 13 November 2016

Academic Editor: Yu-Chang Tyan

Copyright © 2016 Firdevs Kahvecioglu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Objectives. To measure the temperature increase induced during thermocure lamp setting reaction of glass carbomer and to compare it with those induced by visible light curing of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary and permanent teeth. Materials and Methods. Nonretentive class I cavities were prepared in extracted primary and permanent molars. Glass carbomer (GC) was placed in the cavity and set at 60°C for 60 sn using a special thermocure lamp. Resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGIC) and polyacid-modified composite resin (PMCR) were placed in the cavities and polymerized with an LED curing unit. Temperature increases during setting reactions were measured with a J-type thermocouple wire connected to a data logger. Data were examined using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s honestly significant difference tests. Results. The use of GC resulted in temperature changes of 5.17 ± 0.92°C and 5.32 ± 0.90°C in primary and permanent teeth, respectively (). Temperature increases were greatest in the GC group, differing significantly from those in the PMCR group (). Conclusion. Temperature increases during polymerization and setting reactions of the materials were below the critical value in all groups. No difference was observed between primary and permanent teeth, regardless of the material used.