BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Chemical Ecology of Parasitic Hymenoptera

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 5460819 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5460819

Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Theocolax elegans (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to Cereal Grain Volatiles

Academic Editor: Johannes Stökl
Received02 Oct 2015
Revised23 Dec 2015
Accepted05 Jan 2016
Published21 Jan 2016

Abstract

Volatiles emitted by the host’s food would be the first signals used by parasitoids in the host location process and are thought to play an important role in host habitat location. In this study, the olfactory responses of Theocolax elegans (Westwood), a Pteromalid wasp that parasitizes immature stages of stored-product insect pests developing inside cereal or leguminous grains, to volatiles emitted by healthy wheat grains, their hexane extracts, and different doses of three individual compounds previously identified in cereal grain odors were investigated in Y-tube olfactometer and Petri dish arena behavioral bioassays and electroantennogram recordings. In Y-tube olfactometer bioassays, odors from healthy wheat grains and their hexane extracts were attractive to both sexes of T. elegans. Moreover, hexane extracts elicited arresting effects in Petri dish arena. The three synthetic compounds valeraldehyde, maltol, and vanillin elicited dose-dependent responses in both male and female adult wasps confirming the capability of the peripheral olfactory systems to perceive cereal volatiles. In behavioral bioassays, different doses of vanillin were significantly attractive to both sexes.

1. Introduction

The use of natural enemies is considered to be an important component of integrated pest management of stored-grain insect pests [1], particularly in storage areas. Because the adult beneficial insects are external to the grain, they can easily be removed using normal grain-cleaning procedures [2].

In their search for hosts, food and mates parasitoids are guided by multisensory information including visual, vibrational, and olfactory signals [35] which are frequently used in an interactive manner [68].

The success of parasitic wasps in suppressing pest population depends on their ability to locate hosts; therefore, understanding the host location process is critical for the successful implementation of biological control programs. Host-seeking behavior in parasitoids has been divided into four phases, habitat location, host location, host recognition, and host acceptance [3, 9]. Orientation to host plant or host food volatiles in the absence of any host, host damage, and host derived materials have been demonstrated for a number of parasitic wasps [1014], including some Pteromalidae species parasitizing stored-grain insect pests [1517]. These volatiles, generally acting as long distance cues, would be the first signals used by parasitoids in the host location process and are thought to play an important role in host habitat location [1820]. The identification of such synomones has a great practical interest since they could be used as parasitoid behavior modifying compounds to enhance their biological performances.

Theocolax elegans (Westwood) is a solitary ectoparasitoid of immature stages of economically important stored-product insect pests which develop as internal feeders of cereal and legume grains including Rhyzopertha dominica (Fabricius), Sitophilus spp., Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier), and Callosobruchus spp. [21]. T. elegans has been extensively studied as a biological control agent of some cereal pests. In large-scale experiments, the wasp was effective in reducing Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky populations by up to 50% [22] and those of R. dominica by 50–99% depending on the temperature [2325]. Moreover, augmentative release of T. elegans to control R. dominica resulted in a 61–92% reduction of the total number of insect fragments in wheat flour [2] indicating a positive impact on the quality of stored cereal products.

Preliminary behavioral bioassays suggested a preferential orientation of T. elegans adults to odors of healthy wheat grains [26] and the sensitivity of the antennal olfactory systems of both sexes towards a wide range of volatiles identified from various cereal grains [2729] was shown by electroantennogram (EAG) recordings [30].

In the present study, the behavioral responses of T. elegans males and females to odors of uninfested wheat grains and their hexane extracts were carefully investigated using Y-tube olfactometer and Petri dish arena bioassays. Moreover, the biological activity of three individual volatiles (valeraldehyde, maltol, and vanillin) previously identified in the aroma of fresh cereal grains [27] and attractive to the two T. elegans hosts Sitophilus oryzae [31] and S. granarius [32] was investigated in a range of doses by electroantennographic and behavioural bioassays.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Insects

A colony of R. dominica parasitized by T. elegans was collected from a cereal storehouse and set up in glass jars (15 cm diameter × 25 cm) half filled with uninfested wheat kernels and closed with fine metallic net (0.2 mm mesh). Colonies were maintained at °C, % relative humidity, and 12L : 12D photoperiod. During the following four months, wheat kernel samples (5 g) from the rearing jars were periodically transferred to transparent plastic containers (6 cm diameter × 8 cm) and held to check for the emergence of adult wasps. Emerging insects were collected daily and kept individually in glass vials (1.5 cm diameter × 5 cm) without food supply and in the absence of cereal odors for at least 12 h before the EAG and behavioral experiments. The sex of the insects tested was determined by observing their genitalia with a stereomicroscope.

2.2. Extract Preparation

Solvent extracts of wheat kernels (Triticum durum var. Simeto) were prepared by immersing wheat grains (40 g) in hexane (20 mL) for 36 hours at room temperature. Extracts from 3 grain samples were combined and concentrated to 10 mg grain equivalent/μL using a gentle stream of nitrogen and stored at −20°C until being needed.

2.3. Chemicals

Valeraldehyde (1-pentanal), maltol (3-methoxy-2-methyl-4-pyrone), vanillin (3-methoxy-4-hydroxybenzaldehyde), and hexanal used as stimuli and hexane, mineral oil, acetone, and chloroform used as solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milan, Italy) and were 97–99% pure.

2.4. Y-Tube Olfactometer Bioassays

A glass Y-tube olfactometer (each arm 23 cm long at 75°C angle, stem 30 cm long × 3.0 cm i.d.) previously described [33] was used to examine the behavioral responses of T. elegans adults to odor stimuli. Each arm of the Y-tube was connected to a glass cylinder (9 cm long × 3.0 cm i.d.) as an odor source container. The apparatus was put into an observation chamber (90 × 75 × 40 cm) and illuminated from above by two 36-W cool white fluorescent lamps providing uniform lighting (2500 lux) inside the tube. A purified (activated charcoal) and humidified airflow maintained at 6 mL/min by a flowmeter was pumped through each arm.

In order to test the attractiveness of volatiles emitted by healthy wheat grains and their hexane extracts to T. elegans males and females two dual-choice experiments were performed: (1) wheat grains (25 g) versus clean air and (2) wheat grain hexane extracts versus control hexane. In this latter, the odor chamber contained a filter paper disk (1.0 cm2) loaded with 50 μL of a 10 mg grain equivalent/μL hexane extract, while the control chamber contained a filter paper disk loaded with 50 μL of hexane. Both disks were suspended in the center of the cross section. In third set of experiments the behavioral responses of the adult wasps to different doses of vanillin were evaluated. The test stimulus was a filter paper disk loaded with 10 μL of 5 μg/μL vanillin hexane solution, while a similar filter paper disk loaded with 10 μL of hexane was used as control.

Individual T. elegans adults were released at the open end of the stem. Each experiment lasted for 5 min. A choice was recorded when the insect moved 3 cm up an arm of the Y-tube crossing the decision line (marked on both arms) and remained beyond that line for more than 30 sec. Insects that did not make a decision within 5 min were considered as no response and discarded.

After 5 individuals had been tested, the olfactometer was cleaned with acetone and dried (200°C for 30 min) and treatments between arms were switched to avoid position bias. For each test stimulus at least 20 male and female wasps were tested. A test was employed to determine the significance of differences between the number of wasps choosing the treatment or control arm of the olfactometer.

2.5. Electroantennography (EAG)

The electrophysiological response of male and female T. elegans antennae to increasing concentrations of synthetic valeraldehyde, maltol, and vanillin was measured by the EAG technique used in previous studies [30, 34]. Antennae were excised from 1- to 2-day-old insects. The base of the antenna was put into a glass pipette filled with Kaissling saline [35] which served as the neutral electrode. The tip of the antenna was put in contact with the end of a similar pipette (0.1–0.2 mm diameter) which provided the active electrode.

AgCl-coated silver wires were used to maintain the electrical continuity between the antennal preparation and an AC/DC UN-6 amplifier in DC mode connected to a PC equipped with the EAG 2.0 program (Syntech Laboratories, Hilversum, Netherlands). Stimuli were serial solutions (0.0125, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2 mg/μL) of valeraldehyde, maltol, and vanillin, respectively, dissolved in mineral oil, acetone, and chloroform (Sigma-Aldrich) to achieve a satisfactory solution. Just before the experiment, 20 μL of each test solution was adsorbed onto a filter paper strip (1 cm2, Whatman number 1) placed in a Pasteur pipette (15 cm long), which served as an odor cartridge. After complete evaporation of the corresponding solvent, stimuli were blown by a disposable syringe into a constant stream of charcoal-filtered humidified air (500 mL/min) flowing in a stainless steel delivery tube (1 cm diameter) with the outlet positioned at approximately 1 cm from the antenna. Over 1 s, 2.5 cm3 of vapor from an odor cartridge was added. Stimuli were applied in ascending dose [36] and randomly sequenced for each dose. Control (20 μL of mineral oil) and standard (20 μL of 50 μg/μL hexanal mineral oil solution) stimuli were applied at the beginning of the experiment and after each group of 3 test odors. Intervals between stimuli were 30 s. For each compound, EAG responses were recorded from 5 antennae of different insects of each sex.

The amplitude (mV) of the EAG response to each test stimulus was adjusted to compensate for solvent and/or mechanosensory artifacts by subtracting the mean EAG response of the two nearest mineral oil controls [37]. To compensate for the decrease of the antennal responsiveness during the experiment, the resulting EAG amplitude was corrected according to the reduction of the EAG response to the standard stimulus [38]. The activation threshold of dose-response curves was considered to be the lowest dose at which the lower limit of the standard error of the mean response was greater than the upper limit of the standard error for the lowest dilution tested [39]; saturation level was taken as the lowest dose at which the mean response was equal to or less than the previous dose [30]. For each dose tested, the mean EAG responses of each sex to the three compounds were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA), Levene’s test of homogeneity of variance and ranked according to Tukey’s HSD test. Male and female EAG responses to a set test dose of each compound were compared using Student’s t-test.

2.6. Petri Dish Arena Bioassays

The behavioral response of T. elegans males and females to the hexane wheat extract (10 mg grain equivalent/μL) and valeraldehyde, maltol, and vanillin solutions (0.01, 0.1, 1.0, and 5.0 μg/μL) in hexane [31] was assessed in an arena consisting of a glass Petri dish (15 cm diameter × 2 cm height).

The base of the dish was divided into four sectors. An aliquot of the test stimulus (50 μL of hexane wheat extract or 10 μL of a compound solution) was adsorbed onto a filter paper disk (1 cm2, Whatman number 1) and placed in one sector after solvent evaporation (2 min). The remaining sectors contained similar filter paper disks treated with equal volumes of hexane used as controls. Treatment and control stimuli were allowed to diffuse into the arena for 3 min before the experiment started. The Petri dish was placed on the bottom of a white box (90 cm × 75 cm × 40 cm) and illuminated from above resulting in 400 lux on the dish.

An insect was released at the center of the Petri dish and its allocation in the four sectors was recorded for 5 min. After 5 individuals were tested, the olfactometer was cleaned with acetone and dried (200°C for 30 min). The position of the odor sample in the Petri dish was changed routinely to avoid position bias. For each treatment, 15 males and females used once were tested. The time spent by insects in the four sectors was analyzed by Friedman two-way ANOVA by ranks and in the case of significance () the Wilcoxon signed ranks test was used for separation of means. Analyses were performed with SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) version 10.0.7 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).

3. Results

3.1. Behavioral Response to Wheat Grain Volatiles

In Y-tube behavioral tests, the percentage of adult wasps responding to stimuli tested was generally high (Table 1). Odors from wheat grains elicited a significant attraction in both male and female wasps. When insects were presented with wheat grain extract versus control hexane a significant preference for wheat extract was exhibited by both males and females. The mean allocation time of T. elegans males and females in the sector of Petri dish provided with wheat extract was significantly higher (Friedman test, ; Wilcoxon test, ) than those in related controls (Figure 1).


Odor sourcesMaleFemale
Treatedχ2P valueTreatedχ2P value

Wheat grains versus control air20 (20)1812.8<0.00120 (20)1916.2<0.001
Wheat grain extract versus control hexane21 (20)167.2 0.00721 (20)1812.8<0.001

Total sample size (: number of individuals that made a choice in parentheses).
Number of individuals (of those that made a choice) that chose the treated arm first.
d.f. = 1 for all χ2 reported.
3.2. EAG

The sensitivity of male and female T. elegans antennae toward increasing concentrations of valeraldehyde, maltol, and vanillin was reported in Figure 2. All compounds elicited EAG dose-dependent responses with action thresholds at the 1 mg dose in both sexes. The amplitude of the EAG response of both sexes to maltol and that of males to vanillin decreased from 3 to 4 mg doses indicating saturation of receptors at the lowest dose.

For each dose tested, the mean EAG response to valeraldehyde was significantly higher than those to vanillin and maltol in both males (–593.27, , ) (, Tukey-HSD test) and females (–95.84, , ) (, Tukey-HSD test). In both sexes, no significant differences were found between the EAG responses to maltol and vanillin at different doses. Male EAG responses to valeraldehyde were significantly higher (, t-test) than those of females at the 3 and 4 mg doses. Male and female EAG responses to each dose of maltol and vanillin did not differ significantly (, t-test) (Figure 2).

3.3. Behavioral Response to Individual Grain Volatiles

In the range of dose tested, the mean allocation times of T. elegans males and females in the sector of Petri dish provided with maltol or valeraldehyde were not significantly different (Friedman test, ) from those of related controls (Figure 3). A similar result was observed on applying the 100 ng dose of vanillin. Using the 1 μg dose of this compound the mean allocation time in the treatment sector was significantly higher than those in controls in both males (Wilcoxon test, ) and females (Wilcoxon test, ) (Figure 3). At the 10 and 50 μg doses, the mean time spent by male and female wasps in the sector with vanillin was significantly higher (Wilcoxon test, ) than those in controls and higher than those recorded at the 1 μg dose (Figure 3). At the 50 μg dose, vanillin elicited a significant attraction of male (, , ) and female (, , ) wasps in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays.

4. Discussion

T. elegans males and females preferred volatile compounds emitted by healthy wheat grains when offered as an alternative to an empty control in the absence of visual stimuli in a Y-tube olfactometer. Volatile compounds present in hexane extracts of healthy wheat grains were preferred to control hexane in the same apparatus and elicited an arrestant effect in Petri dish arena, thus suggesting the presence of behaviorally active compounds acting as attractants at long distance and arrestants at short range. This implies that both sexes of T. elegans are able to detect host substrate on the basis of chemical cues and confirm their capability to perceive cereal grain odors [30]. Plant volatiles are used by female parasitic wasps to locate the habitat of host insects, while male wasps use the same chemical cues to locate the females for mating [40], probably in combination with a sex pheromone.

When, for instance, host population has declined or the host have dispersed from the emergence site, parasitoids may search for a suitable environment with adequate food sources [3, 41]. According to our results, volatiles released by cereal grains more likely drive T. elegans adults in the search for a suitable host habitat outside and inside cereal storage.

A possible explanation for the attraction of T. elegans adults to cues of healthy grains may be that being hosts concealed inside grains, seed odors probably act as a substitute in situations in which other host related cues, that is, host feces outside the seeds or specific volatiles released by herbivory-damaged grains, are not present to indicate host presence [42]. In this situation, the ability to respond to uninfested grains may serve to prolong parasitoid foraging activity [43, 44] and to exploit a wider range of hosts [42] within the habitat. Alternatively, the blend of volatiles released by healthy seeds may be very similar to that produced by host-damaged seeds causing the parasitoid to respond anyway, at least at long distance. To test this hypothesis, pairwise comparisons of infested and uninfested grains in olfactometer bioassays in combination with chemical analyses of volatile compounds are needed.

The importance of healthy seed volatiles to Pteromalid wasps parasitizing immature stages of internal feeders of cereal or legume seeds was highlighted by previous studies [1517]. For instance, in pairwise comparisons of attractant stimuli in behavioral bioassays mated females of Pteromalus cerealellae (Ashmead) showed preference for the extract of uninfested cowpea seeds compared to larval frass extract [45]. In Lariophagus distinguendus (Förster) host feces alone were not attractive to female wasps while healthy grains were attractive even if less than a combination of host feces and herbivore damaged grains [42] indicating positive short range interactions between host and host food cues.

EAG studies showed that T. elegans males and females are able to detect the three fresh grain volatiles used in this study. This is in accordance with results of behavioral bioassays and provides further evidences that hosts’ food volatiles are used by both male and female parasitic wasps.

For both sexes, different EAG dose-response curves to selected compounds were recorded with valeraldehyde being the most active at all doses tested. This could reflect differences in the number of specific antennal receptors involved in the perception of different cereal volatiles, more than differences in volatility of compounds, and indicate differential selectivity and sensitivity of the peripheral olfactory systems for host habitat odors [40, 46, 47]. Differences in the number of olfactory receptor neurons tuned to different compounds could also explain sexually dimorphic responses observed to high doses of valeraldehyde probably as a result of different roles played by the same plant volatile in the ecology of males and females.

In the dose range from 1 to 50 μg, a significant arresting effect of vanillin to T. elegans males and females was observed in Petri dish arena bioassays whereas, in the same experimental conditions, maltol and valeraldehyde did not influence the parasitoid behavior. Moreover vanillin was preferred to control hexane in Y-tube olfactometer bioassays. It is worth noting that the behavioral responses elicited by vanillin were comparable to that induced by wheat grain hexane extracts in both apparatuses and even comparable to that of wheat grains in Y-tube olfactometer. Despite the strong attractant activity of vanillin to T. elegans adults, the EAG responses evoked by this compound in the range of doses tested showed only moderate amplitudes in both sexes. This is not surprising because a weak correlation between EAG and behavioral activity can occur and it is likely that a few sensilla specifically tuned to an important chemical cue would enhance its detection in the complex blend of plant-based host related volatile compounds [30]. Vanillin was already found to be attractive to S. oryzae [31] and S. granarius [32]. The sensitivity of a parasitoid and its host to the same volatile compounds emitted by host plants was also observed in other tritrophic systems [40, 4851].

5. Conclusions

Results of behavioral bioassays demonstrated strong attractant activity of odors emitted by healthy wheat grains to both sexes of T. elegans. Electroantennogram recordings in response to three fresh cereal grain volatiles confirmed the capability of the peripheral olfactory systems of male and female wasps to detect chemical cues in a range of doses. Finally, in behavioral bioassays with the same compounds, vanillin was shown to be an effective attractant for both sexes of T. elegans. To the best of our knowledge, vanillin is the first synomone of a member of the Theocolax genus. This compound could be useful for detecting T. elegans and manipulating the parasitoid behavior to ensure suitable population levels in the environments where its hosts are present.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. M. Schöller, S. Prozell, A.-G. Al-Kirshi, and C. Reichmuth, “Towards biological control as a major component of integrated pest management in stored product protection,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 81–97, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. W. Flinn and D. W. Hagstrum, “Augmentative releases of parasitoid wasps in stored wheat reduces insect fragments in flour,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 179–186, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. B. Vinson, “Habitat selection by insect parasitoids,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 21, pp. 109–134, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. E. Wajnberg and S. Colazza, Chemical Ecology of Insect Parasitoids, Wiley-Blackwell, London, UK, 2013.
  5. G. Giunti, A. Canale, R. H. Messing et al., “Parasitoid learning: current knowledge and implications for biological control,” Biological Control, vol. 90, pp. 208–219, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. F. L. Wackers and W. J. Lewis, “Olfactory and visual learning and their combined influence on host site location by the parasitoid Microplitis croceipes (Cresson),” Biological Control, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 105–112, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. S. Fischer, J. Samietz, F. Wäckers, and S. Dorn, “Interaction of vibrational and visual cues in parasitoid host location,” Journal of Comparative Physiology, vol. 187, no. 10, pp. 785–791, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. I. Graziosi and L. K. Rieske, “Response of Torymus sinensis, a parasitoid of the gallforming Dryocosmus kuriphilus, to olfactory and visual cues,” Biological Control, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 137–142, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. B. Vinson, “The general host selection behavior of parasitoid hymenoptera and a comparison of initial strategies utilized by larvaphagous and oophagous species,” Biological Control, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 79–96, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. W. Powell and Z.-L. Zhang, “The reactions of two cereal aphid parasitoids, Aphidius uzbekistanicus and A. ervi to host aphids and their food-plants,” Physiological Entomology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 439–443, 1983. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. W. Elzen, H. J. Williams, and S. B. Vinson, “Wind tunnel flight responses by hymenopterous parasitoid Campoletis sonorensis to cotton cultivars and lines,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 285–289, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. W. R. Martin Jr., D. A. Nordlund, and W. C. Nettles Jr., “Response of parasitoid Eucelatoria bryani to selected plant material in an olfactometer,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 499–508, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. Powell and A. F. Wright, “The influence of host food plants on host recognition by four aphidiine parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae),” Bulletin of Entomological Research, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 449–453, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. G. V. Wickremasinghe and H. F. Van Emden, “Reactions of adult female parasitoids, particularly Aphidius rhopalosiphi, to volatile chemical cues from the host plants of their aphid prey,” Physiological Entomology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 297–304, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. L. M. Steidle and M. Schöller, “Olfactory host location and learning in the granary weevil parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae),” Journal of Insect Behavior, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 331–342, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. L. M. Steidle, A. Steppuhn, and J. Reinhard, “Volatile cues from different host complexes used for host location by the generalist parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae),” Basic and Applied Ecology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 45–51, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. Belda and J. Riudavets, “Attraction of the parasitoid Anisopteromalus calandrae (Howard) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to odors from grain and stored product pests in a Y-tube olfactometer,” Biological Control, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. B. Vinson, “The behavior of parasitoids,” in Comprehensive Insect Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, G. A. Kerkut and L. I. Gilbert, Eds., pp. 417–469, Pergamon Press, New York, NY, USA, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  19. D. A. Nordlund, W. J. Lewis, and M. A. Altieri, “Influences of plant-produced allelochemicals on the host/prey selection behaviour of entomophagous insects,” in Novel Aspects of Insect-Plant Interactions, P. Barbosa and D. Letourneau, Eds., pp. 65–90, Wiley, New York, NY, USA, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  20. W. J. Lewis, L. E. M. Vet, J. H. Tumilson, J. C. Van Lenteren, and D. R. Papaj, “Variations in parasitoid foraging behaviour: essential element of a sound biological control theory,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1183–1193, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. W. Flinn, D. W. Hagstrum, W. H. McGaughey, and P. W. Flinn, “Suppression of insects in stored wheat by augmentation with parasitoid wasps,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Working Conference on Stored Product Protection, E. Highley, E. J. Wright, H. J. Banks, and B. R. Champ, Eds., pp. 1103–1105, CAB International, Canberra, Australia, April 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  22. R. N. Williams and E. H. Floyd, “Effect of low temperatures on hymenopterous parasites Choetospila elegans and Anisopteromalus calandrae of the maize weevil,” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1438–1439, 1971. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. W. Flinn, D. W. Hagstrum, and W. H. Mcgaughey, “Suppression of beetles in stored wheat by augmentative releases of parasitic wasps,” Environmental Entomology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 505–511, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. P. W. Flinn, “Temperature effects on efficacy of Choetospila elegans (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to suppress Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in stored wheat,” Journal of Economic Entomology, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 320–323, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. P. W. Flinn and D. W. Hagstrum, “Temperature-mediated functional response of Theocolax elegans (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) parasitizing Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) in stored wheat,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 185–190, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G. S. Germinara, G. Rotundo, and A. De Cristofaro, “Sostanze volatili dei cereali e localizzazione dell'habitat dell’ospite in Theocolax elegans,” Tecnica Molitoria, vol. 55, pp. 324–330, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  27. J. A. Maga, “Cereal volatiles, a review,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 175–178, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. M. Seitz, M. S. Ram, and R. Rengarajan, “Volatiles obtained from whole and ground grain samples by supercritical carbon dioxide and direct helium purge methods: observations on 2,3-butanediols and halogenated anisoles,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 1051–1061, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Zhou, K. Robards, M. Glennie-Holmes, and S. Helliwell, “Analysis of volatile compounds and their contribution to flavor in cereals,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 3941–3953, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. G. S. Germinara, A. De Cristofaro, and G. Rotundo, “Antennal olfactory responses to individual cereal volatiles in Theocolax elegans (Westwood) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae),” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 195–200, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. T. W. Phillips, X.-L. Jiang, W. E. Burkholder, J. K. Phillips, and H. Q. Tran, “Behavioral responses to food volatiles by two species of stored-product coleoptera, Sitophilus oryzae (Curculionidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Tenebrionidae),” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 723–734, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. G. S. Germinara, A. De Cristofaro, and G. Rotundo, “Behavioral responses of adult Sitophilus granarius to individual cereal volatiles,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 523–529, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. G. S. Germinara, A. De Cristofaro, and G. Rotundo, “Chemical cues for host location by the chestnut gall wasp, Dryocosmus kuriphilus,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. Rotundo and E. Tremblay, “Electroantennographic responses of chestnut moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) and their parasitoid Ascogaster quadridentatus Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to volatiles from chestnut (Castanea sativa Miller) leaves,” Redia, vol. 76, pp. 361–373, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  35. K. E. Kaissling and J. Thorson, “Insect olfactory sensilla: structural, chemical and electrical aspects of the functional organization,” in Receptors for Neurotransmitters, Hormones, and Pheromones in Insects, D. B. Sattelle, L. M. Hall, and J. G. Hildebrand, Eds., pp. 261–282, Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, New York, NY, USA, 1980. View at: Google Scholar
  36. C. J. Den Otter, A. De Cristofaro, K. E. Voskamp, and G. Rotundo, “Electrophysiological and behavioural responses of chestnut moths, Cydia fagiglandana and C. splendana (Lep., Tortricidae), to sex attractants and odours of host plants,” Journal of Applied Entomology, vol. 120, no. 7, pp. 413–421, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. A. Raguso and D. M. Light, “Electroantennogram responses of male Sphinx perelegans hawkmoths to floral and ‘green-leaf volatiles’,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 287–293, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. J. Den Otter, T. Tchicaya, and A. M. Schutte, “Effects of age, sex and hunger on the antennal olfactory sensitivity of tsetse flies,” Physiological Entomology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 173–182, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Sant'ana and J. C. Dickens, “Comparative electrophysiological studies of olfaction in predaceous bugs, Podisus maculiventris and P. nigrispinus,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 965–984, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. Y. Li, J. C. Dickens, and W. W. M. Steiner, “Antennal olfactory responsiveness of Microplitis croceipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) to cotton plant volatiles,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 1761–1773, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. T. Meiners and E. Peri, “Chemical ecology of insect parasitoids: essential elements for developing effective biological control programmes,” in Recent Advances in Chemical Ecology of Insect Parasitoids, E. Wajnberg and S. Colazza, Eds., pp. 37–63, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  42. J. L. M. Steidle, “Host recognition cues of the granary weevil parasitoid Lariophagus distinguendus,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 185–192, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. E. Guerrieri, F. Pennacchio, and E. Tremblay, “Effect of adult experience on in-flight orientation to plant and plant-host complex volatiles in Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera, Braconidae),” Biological Control, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 159–165, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. Lo Pinto, E. Wajnberg, S. Colazza, C. Curty, and X. Fauvergue, “Olfactory response of two aphid parasitoids, Lysiphlebus testaceipes and Aphidius colemani, to aphid-infested plants from a distance,” Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 159–164, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. E. O. Onagbola and H. Y. Fadamiro, “Electroantennogram and behavioral responses of Pteromalus cerealellae to odor stimuli associated with its host, Callosobruchus maculatus,” Journal of Stored Products Research, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 123–129, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. M. Light, J. A. Kamm, and R. G. Buttery, “Electroantennogram response of alfalfa seed chalcid, Bruchophagus roddi (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) to host- and nonhost-plant volatiles,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 333–352, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. G. S. Germinara and G. Rotundo, “Electroantennogram responses of Malacosoma neustrium (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae) and its parasitoids Brachymeria intermedia (Nees) (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae) and Pimpla instigator F. (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) to some volatile organic compounds (VOCs),” Bollettino del Laboratorio di Entomologia Agraria Filippo Silvestri, vol. 61, pp. 11–24, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  48. E. H. Salkeld, “Note on anatomy, life history, and behavior of Aphaereta pallipes (Say) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasite of the onion maggot, Hylemya antiqua (Meig.),” The Canadian Entomologist, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 93–97, 1959. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. F. B. Camors Jr. and T. L. Payne, “Response of Heydenia unica (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae) to Dendroctonus frontalis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) pheromones and a host-tree terpene,” Annals of the Entomological Society of America, vol. 65, pp. 31–33, 1972. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. M. Guerin and J. H. Visser, “Electroantennogram responses of the carrot fly, Psila rosae, to volatile plant compounds,” Physiological Entomology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–119, 1980. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. R. Ramachandran and D. M. Norris, “Volatiles mediating plant-herbivore-natural enemy interactions: electroantennogram responses of soybean looper, Pseudoplusia includens, and a parasitoid, Microplitis demolitor, to green leaf volatiles,” Journal of Chemical Ecology, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1665–1690, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Giacinto Salvatore Germinara et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

931 Views | 521 Downloads | 8 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.