BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Achilles Tendinopathy: From the Basic Science to the Clinic

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 6043638 |

Hai-Peng Xue, Xin-Wei Liu, Jing Tian, Bing Xie, Chao Yang, Hao Zhang, Da-Peng Zhou, "Application of Computed Tomography Processed by Picture Archiving and Communication Systems in the Diagnosis of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture", BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 6043638, 8 pages, 2016.

Application of Computed Tomography Processed by Picture Archiving and Communication Systems in the Diagnosis of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture

Academic Editor: Hong-Yun Li
Received30 Jun 2016
Revised19 Sep 2016
Accepted26 Sep 2016
Published18 Dec 2016


The applications of CT examination in the diagnosis of the acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) were investigated. A total of 36 patients with suspected acute Achilles tendon rupture were tested using physical examination, ultrasound, and 3DCT scanning, respectively. Then, surgery was performed for the patients who showed positive result in at least two of the three tests for AATR. 3DVR, MPR, and the other CT scan image processing and diagnosis were conducted in PACS (picture archiving and communication system). PACS was also used to measure the length of distal broken ends of the Achilles tendon (AT) to tendon calcaneal insertion. Our study indicated that CT has the highest accuracy in diagnosis of acute Achilles tendon complete rupture. The length measurement is matched between PACS and those actually measured in operation. CT not only demonstrates more details directly in three dimensions especially with the rupture involved calcaneal insertion flap but also locates the rupture region for percutaneous suture by measuring the length of distal stump in PACS without the effect of the position of ankle. The accuracy of CT diagnosis for Achilles tendon partial rupture is yet to be studied.

1. Introduction

Acute Achilles tendon rupture is the most common tendon injures of lower limbs [1]. Physical examination, color Doppler ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have high rates of diagnosis, but each one has its drawbacks and limitations, so there is still no golden standard for diagnosis. Thompson’s sign test is not very obvious in some patients with AATR for the intact plantar tendon or more proximal rupture. Ultrasound is often chosen to diagnose AATR, because of high accuracy and being economical and easy to use. However, complete rupture is usually misdiagnosed by ultrasound as partial rupture which will influence the strategy of treatment [2]. MRI also has high accuracy, but it may have few days’ appointment for examination, and some authors even suggest MRI is unnecessary for diagnosing AATR [3].

CT is usually used for checking lungs, brain, and internal organs. Three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) has been used to diagnose the osteopathy for its high spatial resolution which can appraise bones in any views. It has been reported that 3DCT was used for tendon inspection two decades ago [4], but the results appeared unsatisfactory due to technology limitations. Thus, CT diagnosis of soft tissue has not been widely used. However, CT technology has been developing rapidly in recent years. Hardware has developed from the 4 rows scan to 256 MDCT and even dual energy CT [5] as well as gemstones CT [6]. Postprocessing technology has also been improved greatly such as the emergence of shaded surface display (SSD), maximum intensity projection (MIP), multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), three-dimensional-volume rendering (3DVR) [711], and kinematic 4DCT [12]. The new technologies not only reduce the diagnostic time significantly, but also demonstrate more distinction and intuitive information than before. Recently, some authors have reported the diagnosis of tendon disease with computed tomography [13, 14]. However, the accuracy of CT technology for diagnosis of acute Achilles tendon rupture has not been reported.

PACS has been widely used in most of large-scale hospitals. It can receive and store archive images from medical imaging modalities (including CT, MR, CR, DX, and any other DICOM device, except US) and distributes them to DICOM devices [15]. DICOM data saved in PACS servers will not deform images. The images can be stored for a long time and can be retrieved anytime in any computer where PACS client has been installed. Surgeons trained in a few hours can process DICOM by PACS like radiologists and are able to get more useful information and details of injures directly. In this work, we expect to explore the advantages and disadvantages of CT diagnosis processed by PACS of AATR.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients Selection and Diagnosis

From February 1, 2014, to May 1, 2016, patients who had a history of acute sudden pain of Achilles tendon were included. Cases such as opening injure, Achilles tendinitis, and chronic rupture were excluded. The patients were examined by US and 3DCT scanning after one orthopedist finished the physical examination. And then, another orthopedist processed the DICOM data with 3DVR and MPR modules of PACS and got a CT diagnosis.

2.2. CT Examination

GE LightSpeed VCT, KVP 120 kV, X-ray tube current 200–230 mA, slice thickness 0.625 mm, spacing between slices 5.0, and 64 Spiral CT were used in this study. Dual energy CT can better display calcium deposits in the blood vessels, but not as good as ordinary CT on showing the tendon [16]. Gemstone CT can effectively reduce the shadow of implants, but not improve tendon images [17]. As we all know, CT scanning parameters are different for different tissues. The greater the tube current the better the image which displays the details of the tissues while the amount of radiation is larger. There are no common CT conditions for the tendon scanning. The parameters for the bone scanning are used for tendon scanning though a clear image of Achilles tendon can be obtained [13, 14]. Hopefully, scholars can design the parameters specifically for Achilles tendon scanning. So the radiation absorption can be reduced and clear images can be obtained.

2.3. PACS

The information of patient scanned by CT was saved as DICOM and was translated to PACS (Aquarius Net, Terarecon, Foster City, CA, USA) servers. We can retrieve those data by searching ID or names in PACS which has many useful modules like 3DVR, MPR, MIP, VR, CPR, and other image processing functions. Each module has many templates. We can switch and demonstrate various tissues in one window by choosing different templates of 3DVR. We can also create a new template to demonstrate many tissues in one picture (Figure 1(a)). In this research, we have created template which can display bone and tendon at the same time to observe the relationship between them. The measurement function allows us to measure the distance between any points or lines in 2D or 3D images and can be accurate to 0.1 mm.

2.4. 3DVR Postprocessing

3DVR Reconstruction is the most common CT three-dimensional displaying method [18]. The attenuation values (or Hounsfield units) are different for different tissue at CT scan. HU of air is defined as −1000, water HU is defined as 0, the fat is about −100 HU, muscle 40 HU, Achilles 100 HU, and bone 200–500 HU [13]. Different tissues can be displayed in one image distinguishingly when different HU threshold values are assigned to different colors. The front of the Achilles tendon is fat and the skin is at the back. A three-dimensional image of the tendon and bone can be obtained after hiding the skin and fat based on the HU values. After we got the data of patients by PACS, choose the bone 3DVR template (window width 500, window level 400, opacity 1.0, and white color) and add a tendon tissue bar (window width 200, window level 100, opacity 0.8–1.0, and red color), or choose the template we had created before. It is important to note that the voltage can affect HU value. The higher the voltage is, the higher the HU value is [19], so fine-tune is needed to get clear outline of Achilles tendon (Figure 1(b)).

2.5. MPR Postprocessing

When a patient lays on his back for CT scan, legs are in a swing state. The coronal and sagittal images based on torso axis are not lower limb axial images (Figure 1(a)). The coronal and sagittal images of lower limb can be obtained through MPR reconstruction by adjusting the angle of the axis. The images of coronal, sagittal, and tangential are shown in mutually perpendicular plane, respectively. The axis of each plane is adjusted to get real axial, sagittal, and coronal images of AT. Better contrast between tendons and other soft tissues can be obtained by window width and window level through MPR module. You can also adjust the axis to vertical or horizontal to the tibia, tendons, or other tissues to reduce the position requirements for CT scan. More details of the damage can also be learned from the different levels [9]. We can observe the continuity and tension of AT in 3DVR and MPR images and get a CT diagnosis. If the diagnosis is rupture, the length of distal broken ends to tendon calcaneal insertion would be measured (Figure 2(a)).

2.6. Treatments

A surgery will be conducted if a patient shows positive result in at least two of those three tests: (A) Thompson’s sign test in clinical examination; (B) complete rupture diagnosed by ultrasound; (C) complete rupture diagnosed by CT. The length of distal stump measured in CT MPR images was used as a reference in a mini-incision (Figure 2(b)). An operation would be conducted to fix the rupture tendons, and the real length of distal stump would be measured in the operation (Figure 2(c)). An above-knee cast with ankle plantar flexion is placed after the operation for 3 weeks and then shifted to below-knee cast for another 3 weeks.

3. Result

3.1. Patients Information

There are 33 males and 3 females in the study. The oldest is 81 years old, and the youngest is 17 years old. The average age is 37.6 years. The shortest time between diagnosis and injury was 0.5 hours and the longest time was 48 hours. For the causes of injuries, 11 patients were injured from playing basketball, 6 patients were injured during playing badminton, 4 patients were injured due to playing jump rope, 4 patients were injured because of playing soccer, 3 patients were injured during running, 4 patients were injured in the training, and 5 patients were injured due to other causes.

3.2. Accuracy of CT Diagnosis

As listed in Table 1, there are total of 36 patients. 33 patients showed positive result in Thompson’s sign test. 4 were diagnosed as Achilles tendon partial rupture (PR) and 32 were diagnosed as complete Achilles tendon rupture (CR) in Doppler ultrasound diagnosis. CT results showed all 36 patients had acute Achilles tendon complete rupture. In the operation, all the Achilles tendons were completely ruptured. Based on these results, CT diagnosis is the most accurate method to diagnose acute Achilles tendon complete rupture. Diagnostic accuracy of CT for acute Achilles tendon partial rupture is to be studied.

Thompson’s sign testTotal
PositiveNegative or WP


WP: weakly positive; CR: complete rupture; PR: partial rupture; IO: intraoperation.
3.3. Accuracy of CT Measurement

The length of distal stump (LODS) measured in CT is  cm (range 0–7.0 cm), and LODS measured intraoperation is (range 0–7.2 cm) (Figure 3). Pearson correlation coefficients show a high correlation (, ) (Table 2).


CTPearson correlation10.963
Sig. (2-tailed)0.000

IOPearson correlation0.9631
Sig. (2-tailed)0.000

4. Discussion

AATR is the most common tendon of lower limbs [1], although the AT is one of the strongest tendons of human [20]. It usually happens in patients between 30 and 40 years old [21] and significantly more men than women [22]. The incidence rate has trended higher [23, 24] recently. Rupture is located in the middle distance at the tendon insertion 2–6 cm [25]. In our study, the ratio of men to women is close to 11 : 1 with an average of 37.6 years old. Most incidences happened when patients took part in various sports activities who are middle-aged and fat. The distance between the rupture site to the tendon stump position has an average of 3.8 cm as some other studies reported.

Clinical examination is the first and most important step to diagnose the Achilles ruptures: ecchymosis and swelling occur rapidly in the first 24 hours after injury. A palpable gap can be touched at the rupture site and plantar flexion power is more often diminished [26]. Thompson’s sign test has been a routine examination since it is described by Thompson and Doherty in 1962 [27]. However, Thompson’s sign test is not very obvious for the intact plantar tendon, and the diminished plantar flexion strength may be less with a more proximal rupture [28], and the palpable gap will be overlooked with soft tissue swelling. In this study, Thompson’s sign was weakly positive for 3 patients, and these 3 patients had the plantar tendons intact. Therefore, some other diagnostics are necessary as supplements of Thompson’s sign test. Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging are recognized to be the most useful technique to diagnose the AATR [29, 30].

Margetić et al. [2] study showed that ultrasound has an excellent result. But 8 patients with complete rupture had been diagnosed as partial rupture, though it was found that only 2 patients had partial rupture in the operation. The misdiagnosis might result in entirely different therapeutic strategies and prognosis. Coincidentally, the accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis will be also influenced by experience and some other subjective factors of the sonographer. Otherwise, orthopedist can only be given a result of the diagnosis such as Achilles tendon complete rupture. There are not any other details like the region, range of rupture, or the relationship with the bone around it which could be observed by imaging examination.

In this study, 4 patients were diagnosed by ultrasound as partial rupture. but Thompson’s test showed positive sign, and they were diagnosed by CT as Achilles tendon complete rupture. It can be seen in CT 3DVR images that the tendon was thickening, rather than thinning or missing at broken ends (Figure 4(a)). They were caused by the overlap of broken end and hematomas near the surrounding areas, where the HU value is approximate to tendons. So it looks like Achilles Tendinitis or old Achilles tendon injury [13]. Furthermore, 3DVR images showed bending and thickening of the tendon, and MPR images were even more obvious because the tension disappears and the distal part of tendon retreats slightly for the AATR (Figure 4(b)).

In addition, the accuracy can be even improved if comparing with the contralateral limb (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)). This can be done by increasing the scanning window and getting data of both lower extremities. This does not increase radiation exposure time or radiation damage because it is only one scan and the absorbed radiation for distal limb is much less than the abdomen. The only cost is to need more storage to save the data.

MRI has a higher accuracy than ultrasound in the diagnosis of Achilles tendon rupture, especially chronic ones [30, 31]. But Garras et al. [3] suggested MRI is unnecessary for diagnosing AATR because it would take so many days to obtain MRI scanning after the injury, which is time consuming and expensive and may lead to treatment delays. MRI can even be contraindicated if patients have metal hardware or a history of claustrophobia or obesity [7]. In our hospital, MRI check has been occasionally used as diagnosis for AATR. Patients usually need to wait for 1–3 days. After that soft tissue is at the peak of edema and the distance of broken end increases due to broken end shrinking back gradually. These caused difficulty of microsurgery, and also increased risk of incision healing. Therefore, we do not use MRI diagnosis unless other examinations do not work. By contrast, CT is more efficient. It is easily to take CT scanning, and we can get the information by PACS quickly, when the patients may not leave the scanning room.

Clinicians can use PACS System observing any position of an injury intuitively in 3DVR images, rather than getting only one conclusion from ultrasound and hard to understand details of the damage. CT’s advantage is more significant when Achilles tendon calcaneal insertion breaks and combined with avulsed bone (Figures 5(a)5(e)). MRI data can also be processed using 3DVR, but it is hard to get clearer images. It is difficult to hide the surrounding tissues from tendon based on HU values, because water content in the Achilles tendon is similar to water content in the surrounding tissues and they have similar HU values [32] (Figure 5(f)).

Minimally invasive percutaneous suture technique has been accepted by the majority of doctors because it can greatly reduce the complications of the surgical incision of Achilles tendon problems [3337]. The precise positioning of the broken end is the basis of minimally invasive surgery. After Achilles tendon ruptures, it is difficult to determine the accurate position because proximal muscles contract. Despite the fact that distal tendinous length has smaller change, it is still difficult to accurately locate the broken position because the tendon sheath remained relatively intact and distal tendon can slide up and down in the lumen of the sheath as well as due to local swelling [38]. Ultrasound can position broken end in surface of projection location, but errors may also occur with ankle joint plantarflexion or dorsiflexion [39]. Some doctors used ultrasound for positioning during surgeries, but they need to have ultrasound knowledge which makes it hard to promote this practice [40]. Accordingly, it was mostly relying on the doctor’s experience to determine the location of broken end.

Another significant advantage of CT in the diagnosis of AATR is to determine the rupture location. The length of distal stump of Achilles tendon is relatively stable. We can locate the rupture position with the distance to the calcaneal insertion measured predetermined in CT MPR images whenever ankle joint is plantarflexion or dorsiflexion. So the accurate measurement is very helpful to locate the rupture position in the surgeries. Figure 3 indicated that there is high correlation between CT measurements and the measurements in the surgeries on the distal stump length.

In this study, there were two orthopedists to make the clinical diagnosis and CT diagnosis independently to eliminate subjective factors, but CT still showed excellent accuracy. Our sample size is small, and there is no acute Achilles tendon partial rupture. So the result may be more convinced when the sample size is larger and contains more types of rupture.

Some scholars also believe that there is no difference between normal image of Achilles tendon and the image of the partial rupture of Achilles tendon [13]. We did not see Achilles tendon partial rupture in our study. Thus, CT diagnosis of acute Achilles tendon partial rupture is yet to be studied.

In some cases, CT images of AATR are similar with Achilles Tendinitis or old Achilles tendon injury, so medical history is necessary for diagnosis.

5. Conclusions

CT diagnosis has higher accuracy than physical examination or color US for the acute Achilles tendon complete rupture. The details of the injury can be reviewed readily based on CT postprocessing data using PACS System. The relationship of Achilles tendon and the surrounding bone tissues can be shown when the broken end involves the avulsed fragment. The position and length can be accurately measured by PACS, which can provide strong support for minimally invasive surgery. But the accuracy of CT diagnosis for Achilles tendon partial rupture is yet to be studied.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence their work; there is no professional or other personal interests of any nature or kind in any product, service, and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.


  1. S. F. Habusta, “Bilateral simultaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon: a rare traumatic injury,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 320, pp. 231–234, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  2. P. Margetić, D. Miklić, V. Rakić-Eršek, Z. Doko, Z. I. Lubina, and B. Brkljačić, “Comparison of ultrasonographic and intraoperative findings in achilles tendon rupture,” Collegium Antropologicum, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 279–284, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  3. D. N. Garras, S. M. Raikin, S. B. Bhat, N. Taweel, and H. Karanjia, “MRI is unnecessary for diagnosing acute achilles tendon ruptures: clinical diagnostic criteria foot and ankle,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 470, no. 8, pp. 2268–2273, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. J. Bellon and S. M. Horwitz, “Three-dimensional computed tomography studies of the tendons of the foot and ankle,” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 46–49, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. Xu, J. L. Ducote, J. T. Wong, and S. Molloi, “Dynamic dual-energy chest radiography: a potential tool for lung tissue motion monitoring and kinetic study,” Physics in Medicine and Biology, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1191–1205, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Z. Zhu, X. M. Zhao, Y. F. Zhao, X. Y. Wang, and C. W. Zhou, “Feasibility study of using gemstone spectral imaging (GSI) and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) for reducing radiation and iodine contrast dose in abdominal CT patients with high BMI values,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 6, article e0129201, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  7. J. Fritz, E. K. Fishman, F. Corl, J. A. Carrino, K. L. Weber, and L. M. Fayad, “Imaging of limb salvage surgery,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 198, no. 3, pp. 647–660, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. B. S. Kuszyk, D. G. Heath, D. F. Bliss, and E. K. Fishman, “Skeletal 3-D CT: Advantages of volume rendering over surface rendering,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 207–214, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. H. Lim, B. C. Jun, and S. W. Song, “Clinical feasibility of multiplanar reconstruction images of temporal bone CT in the diagnosis of temporal bone fracture with otic-capsule-sparing facial nerve paralysis,” Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 219–224, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. J. Whyms, H. K. Vorperian, L. R. Gentry, E. M. Schimek, E. T. Bersu, and M. K. Chung, “The effect of computed tomographic scanner parameters and 3-dimensional volume rendering techniques on the accuracy of linear, angular, and volumetric measurements of the mandible,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, vol. 115, no. 5, pp. 682–691, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. Cutroneo, D. Bruschetta, F. Trimarchi et al., “In vivo CT direct volume rendering: a three-dimensional anatomical description of the heart,” Polish Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, pp. 21–28, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  12. J. T. Shores, S. Demehri, and A. Chhabra, “Kinematic ‘4 dimensional’ CT imaging in the assessment of wrist biomechanics before and after surgical repair,” Eplasty, vol. 13, article e9, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  13. S. Demehri, M. Chalian, S. J. Farahani, E. K. Fishman, and L. M. Fayad, “Detection and characterization of tendon abnormalities with multidetector computed tomography,” Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 299–307, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Abe, H. Ishikawa, A. Murasawa, and K. Nakazono, “Extensor tendon rupture and three-dimensional computed tomography imaging of the rheumatoid wrist,” Skeletal Radiology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 325–331, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. W. Tzeng, K. Kuo, H. Lin, and T. Chen, “A Socio-technical assessment of the success of picture archiving and communication systems: the radiology technologist's perspective,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 13, no. 1, article 109, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. G. Lohan, K. Motamedi, K. Chow et al., “Does dual-energy CT of lower-extremity tendons incur penalties in patient radiation exposure or reduced multiplanar reconstruction image quality?” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 191, no. 5, pp. 1386–1390, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Y. Jia, J. Zhang, J. Fan et al., “Gemstone spectral imaging reduced artefacts from metal coils or clips after treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a retrospective study of 35 patients,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 88, no. 1055, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  18. A. H. Mahnken, J. E. Wildberger, A. M. Sinha et al., “Value of 3D-volume rendering in the assessment of coronary arteries with retrospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 302–309, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Parsa, N. Ibrahim, B. Hassan, A. Motroni, P. Der Van Stelt, and D. Wismeijer, “Influence of cone beam CT scanning parameters on grey value measurements at an implant site,” Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, vol. 42, no. 3, Article ID 79884780, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. DeMaio, R. Paine, and D. J. Drez Jr., “Achilles tendonitis,” Orthopedics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 195–204, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  21. R. J. Khan and R. L. Carey Smith, “Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 9, Article ID CD003674, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  22. G. S. Karin, B. Annelie, O. Nicklas, B. I. Eriksson, and K. Jon, “Sex differences in outcome after an acute achilles tendon rupture,” The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 2, no. 2, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  23. A. Ganestam, T. Kallemose, A. Troelsen, and K. W. Barfod, “Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013. A nationwide registry study of 33,160 patients,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T. T. Huttunen, P. Kannus, C. Rolf, L. Felländer-Tsai, and V. M. Mattila, “Acute achilles tendon ruptures: incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012,” American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2419–2423, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. J. Coughlin, R. A. Mann, and C. L. Saltzman, Charles Saltzman: Surgery of the Foot and Ankle, 8th edition, 2007.
  26. G. W. C. Ma and T. G. Griffith, “Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured Achilles tendon: a new technique,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 128, pp. 247–255, 1977. View at: Google Scholar
  27. T. C. Thompson and J. H. Doherty, “Spontaneous rupture of tendon of Achilles: a new clinical diagnostic test,” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 2, pp. 126–129, 1962. View at: Google Scholar
  28. N. Giannestras, Foot Disorders: Medical and Surgical Management, Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 1973.
  29. M. Paavola, T. Paakkala, P. Kannus, and M. Järvinen, “Ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of achilles tendon injuries and related disorders: a comparison between pre-operative ultrasonography and surgical findings,” Acta Radiologica, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 612–619, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  30. K. M. Khan, B. B. Forster, J. Robinson et al., “Are ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of value in assessment of Achilles tendon disorders? A two year prospective study,” British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 149–153, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. F. Sadek, E. H. Fouly, M. A. Laklok, and M. F. Amin, “Functional and MRI follow-up after reconstruction of chronic ruptures of the Achilles tendon Myerson type III using the triple-loop plantaris tendon wrapped with central turndown flap: a case series,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 10, no. 1, article 109, pp. 1–10, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  32. G. Anastasi, G. Cutroneo, D. Bruschetta et al., “Three-dimensional volume rendering of the ankle based on magnetic resonance images enables the generation of images comparable to real anatomy,” Journal of Anatomy, vol. 215, no. 5, pp. 592–599, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. Krueger and S. David, “The effectiveness of open repair versus percutaneous repair for an acute achilles tendon rupture: a critically appraised topic,” Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Mavrodontidis, M. Lykissas, P. Koulouvaris, D. Pafilas, V. Kontogeorgakos, and C. Zalavras, “Percutaneous repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a functional evaluation study with a minimum 10-year follow-up,” Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 661–667, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  35. H. Chen, X. Ji, Q. Zhang, X. Liang, and P. Tang, “Erratum to: channel-assisted minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 11, article 15, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  36. B. Shi and Z. Y. Li, “Double minimally invasive incisions for surgical repair of the acute closed Achilles tendon rupture,” Zhongguo Gu Shang, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 820–823, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  37. Z. Y. He, M. X. Chai, Y. J. Liu et al., “Percutaneous repair technique for acute achilles tendon rupture with assistance of kirschner wire,” Orthopaedic Surgery, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 359–363, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. H. Amlang, H. Zwipp, A. Friedrich, A. Peaden, A. Bunk, and S. Rammelt, “Ultrasonographic classification of achilles tendon ruptures as a rationale for individual treatment selection,” ISRN Orthopedics, vol. 2011, Article ID 869703, 10 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. A. Qureshi, T. Ibrahim, W. J. Rennie, and A. Furlong, “Dynamic ultrasound assessment of the effects of knee and ankle position on achilles tendon apposition following acute rupture,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series A, vol. 93, no. 24, pp. 2265–2270, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Lacoste, J. M. Féron, and B. Cherrier, “Percutaneous Tenolig® repair under intra-operative ultrasonography guidance in acute Achilles tendon rupture,” Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 925–930, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Hai-Peng Xue et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.