Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 6382825, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6382825
Research Article

Perinatal and Neonatal Outcomes of Patients Who Were Diagnosed with Neural Tube Defect in Midtrimester Fetal Ultrasound Scan and Refused Request for Termination of Pregnancy

1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Inonu, 44280 Malatya, Turkey
2Private Clinic of Yavuz Simsek, 71200 Kırıkkale, Turkey

Received 16 September 2016; Accepted 8 November 2016

Academic Editor: Eberval G. Figueiredo

Copyright © 2016 Rauf Melekoglu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Loane, H. Dolk, A. Kelly, C. Teljeur, R. Greenlees, and J. Densem, “Paper 4: EUROCAT statistical monitoring: Identification and investigation of ten year trends of congenital anomalies in Europe,” Birth Defects Research Part A—Clinical and Molecular Teratology, vol. 91, supplement 1, pp. S31–S43, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. C. T. Norem, E. J. Schoen, D. L. Walton et al., “Routine ultrasonography compared with maternal serum alpha-fetoprotein for neural tube defect screening,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 106, no. 4, pp. 747–752, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. O. S. Aaronson, M. Hernanz-Schulman, J. P. Bruner, G. W. Reed, and N. B. Tulipan, “Myelomeningocele: prenatal evaluation—comparison between transabdominal US and MR imaging,” Radiology, vol. 227, no. 3, pp. 839–843, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. S. Trudell and A. O. Odibo, “Diagnosis of spina bifida on ultrasound: always termination?” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 367–377, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. M. Bowman, D. G. McLone, J. A. Grant, T. Tomita, and J. A. Ito, “Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective,” Pediatric Neurosurgery, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 114–120, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. D. Cochrane, R. D. Wilson, P. Steinbok et al., “Prenatal spinal evaluation and functional outcome of patients born with myelomeningocele: information for improved prenatal counselling and outcome prediction,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 159–168, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Aygün, S. Vurucu, F. Çakmak-Çelik, A. Dağçınar, B. Tanyeri, and Ş. Küçüködük, “Experience of a tertiary care center on 100 newborns with neural tube defects,” Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 359–364, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. H. Nicolaides, S. G. Gabbe, S. Campbell, and R. Guidetti, “Ultrasound screening for spina bifida: cranial and cerebellar signs,” The Lancet, vol. 328, no. 8498, pp. 72–74, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. C. Van den Hof, K. H. Nicolaides, J. Campbell, and S. Campbell, “Evaluation of the lemon and banana signs in one hundred thirty fetuses with open spina bifida,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 322–327, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Ekin, C. Gezer, C. E. Taner et al., “Chromosomal and structural anomalies in fetuses with open neural tube defects,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 156–159, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. E. Stevenson, L. H. Seaver, J. S. Collins, and J. H. Dean, “Neural tube defects and associated anomalies in South Carolina,” Birth Defects Research Part A—Clinical and Molecular Teratology, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 554–558, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Ceylaner, G. Ceylaner, I. Günyeli et al., “Postmortem evaluation of 220 prenatally diagnosed fetuses with neural tube defects: detection of associated anomalies in a Turkish population,” Prenatal Diagnosis, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 147–153, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Stoll, B. Dott, Y. Alembik, and M.-P. Roth, “Associated malformations among infants with neural tube defects,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A, vol. 155, no. 3, pp. 565–568, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Wataganara, A. Grunebaum, F. Chervenak, and M. Wielgos, “Delivery modes in case of fetal malformations,” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. D. C. Merrill, P. Goodwin, J. M. Burson, Y. Sato, R. Williamson, and C. P. Weiner, “The optimal route of delivery for fetal meningomyelocele,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 235–240, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. D. Wilson, F. Audibert, J. A. Brock et al., “Prenatal screening, diagnosis, and pregnancy management of fetal neural tube defects,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 927–942, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. R. Melekoglu, S. Eraslan, E. Celik, and Y. Simsek, “Perinatal and neonatal outcomes of patients who were diagnosed neural tube defect in midtrimester fetal ultrasound scan and refused request for termination of pregnancy,” in Proceedings of the 15th World Congress in Fetal Medicine, Mallorca, Spain, June 2016.
  18. N. S. Adzick, E. A. Thom, C. Y. Spong et al., “A randomized trial of prenatal versus postnatal repair of myelomeningocele,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 11, pp. 993–1004, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus