Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 6741418, 18 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/6741418
Research Article

An Interoperability Platform Enabling Reuse of Electronic Health Records for Signal Verification Studies

1SRDC Software Research & Development and Consultancy Ltd., 06800 Ankara, Turkey
2Department of Computer Engineering, Middle East Technical University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey
3Lombardia Informatica S.p.A., Via Torquato Taramelli, 26 20124 Milano, Italy
4WHO Collaborating Centre for International Drug Monitoring, Uppsala Monitoring Centre (UMC), 753 20 Uppsala, Sweden
5Advanced Clinical Applications Research Group, Agfa HealthCare, 9000 Gent, Belgium

Received 12 June 2015; Accepted 4 October 2015

Academic Editor: Vassilis Koutkias

Copyright © 2016 Mustafa Yuksel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Philadelphia Inquirer, “AstraZeneca abandons blood thinner, citing risk Exanta dropped because of risks,” June 2015, http://articles.philly.com/2006-02-15/business/25408584_1_exanta-iressa-crestor.
  2. L. Hazell and S. A. W. Shakir, “Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review,” Drug Safety, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 385–396, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. G. M. van der Heijden, E. P. van Puijenbroek, S. van Buuren, and J. W. van der Hofstede, “On the assessment of adverse drug reactions from spontaneous reporting systems: the influence of under-reporting on odds ratios,” Statistics in Medicine, vol. 21, no. 14, pp. 2027–2044, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. W. Bates, R. S. Evans, H. Murff, P. D. Stetson, L. Pizzifferri, and G. Hripcsak, “Detecting adverse events using information technology,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 115–128, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. J. Cullen, D. W. Bates, S. D. Small, J. B. Cooper, A. R. Nemeskal, and L. L. Leape, “The incident reporting system does not detect adverse drug events: a problem for quality improvement,” The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 541–548, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Lindquist, “Data quality management in pharmacovigilance,” Drug Safety, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 857–870, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. AHRQ Patient Safety Network, Voluntary Patient Safety Event Reporting (Incident Reporting), http://www.psnet.ahrq.gov/primer.aspx?primerID=13.
  8. G. N. Norén and I. R. Edwards, “Opportunities and challenges of adverse drug reaction surveillance in electronic patient records,” PharmacoVigilance Review, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–20, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. N. Norén and I. R. Edwards, “Modern methods of pharmacovigilance: detecting adverse effects of drugs,” Clinical Medicine, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 486–489, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. N. Norén, J. Hopstadius, A. Bate, K. Star, and I. R. Edwards, “Temporal pattern discovery in longitudinal electronic patient records,” Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 361–387, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. SALUS: Scalable, Standard based Interoperability Framework for Sustainable Proactive Post Market Safety Studies, June 2015, http://www.salusproject.eu/.
  12. F. Turisco, D. Keogh, C. Stubbs, J. Glaser, and W. F. Crowley Jr., “Current status of integrating information technologies into the clinical research enterprise within US academic health centers: strategic value and opportunities for investment,” Journal of Investigative Medicine, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 425–433, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. J. Powell and I. Buchan, “Electronic health records should support clinical research,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 7, article e4, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. L. West, C. Blake, Z. Liu, J. N. McKoy, M. D. Oertel, and T. S. Carey, “Reflections on the use of electronic health record data for clinical research,” Health Informatics Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 108–121, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. Ohmann and W. Kuchinke, “Future developments of medical informatics from the viewpoint of networked clinical research. Interoperability and integration,” Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 45–54, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H.-U. Prokosch and T. Ganslandt, “Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research,” Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 38–44, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. Breil, A. Semjonow, and M. Dugas, “HIS-based electronic documentation can significantly reduce the time from biopsy to final report for prostate tumours and supports quality management as well as clinical research,” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 9, article 5, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. Kush, L. Alschuler, R. Ruggeri et al., “Implementing Single Source: the STARBRITE proof-of-concept study,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 662–673, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. E. C. Murphy, F. L. Ferris III, and W. R. O'Donnell, “An electronic medical records system for clinical research and the EMR-EDC interface,” Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 4383–4389, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. El Fadly, C. Daniel, C. Bousquet, T. Dart, P.-Y. Lastic, and P. Degoulet, “Electronic healthcare record and clinical research in cardiovascular radiology. HL7 CDA and CDISC ODM interoperability,” AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2007, pp. 216–220, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  21. A. El Fadly, B. Rance, N. Lucas et al., “Integrating clinical research with the Healthcare Enterprise: From the RE-USE project to the EHR4CR platform,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 44, supplement 1, pp. S94–S102, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. N. Murphy, G. Weber, M. Mendis et al., “Serving the enterprise and beyond with informatics for integrating biology and the bedside (i2b2),” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 124–130, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. HL7, Reference Information Model (RIM), http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/rim.cfm.
  24. ISO/CEN. EN 13606-1, Health informatics—Electronic health record communication—Part 1: Reference model, 2008.
  25. CDISC, “Operational Data Model (ODM),” June 2015, http://www.cdisc.org/odm.
  26. D. B. Fridsma, J. Evans, S. Hastak, and C. N. Mead, “The BRIDG Project: a technical report,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 130–137, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP), June 2015, http://omop.org/.
  28. FDA. Sentinel Initiative—Mini-Sentinel, http://mini-sentinel.org/.
  29. H. J. Lowe, T. A. Ferris, P. M. Hernandez, and S. C. Weber, “STRIDE—an integrated standards-based translational research informatics platform,” AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2009, pp. 391–395, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  30. P. Avillach, J.-C. Dufour, G. Diallo et al., “Design and validation of an automated method to detect known adverse drug reactions in MEDLINE: a contribution from the EU-ADR project,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 446–452, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. G. M. Weber, S. N. Murphy, A. J. McMurry et al., “The Shared Health Research Information Network (SHRINE): a prototype federated query tool for clinical data repositories,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 624–630, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. Rea, J. Pathak, G. Savova et al., “Building a robust, scalable and standards-driven infrastructure for secondary use of EHR data: the SHARPn project,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 763–771, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. IHE. Profiles, http://www.ihe.net/profiles/.
  34. HL7, ASTM International, Continuity of Care Document (CCD) Release 1, June 2015, http://wiki.hl7.org/index.php?title=Product_CCD.
  35. IHE. Drug Safety Content Profile (DSC), http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_QRPH_TF_Supplement_Drug_Safety_Content_DSC_TI_2009-08-10.pdf.
  36. IHE, “Clinical Research Data Capture Profile (CRD),” June 2015, http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title=Clinical_Research_Data_Capture_-_(CRD).
  37. CDISC, “Clinical Data Acquisition Standards Harmonization (CDASH),” June 2015, http://www.cdisc.org/cdash.
  38. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals For Human Use (ICH). Electronic Transmission of Individual Case Safety Reports Message Specification—E2B(R2), 2001.
  39. A. Dogac, G. B. Laleci, S. Kirbas et al., “Artemis: deploying semantically enriched web services in the healthcare domain,” Information Systems, vol. 31, no. 4-5, pp. 321–339, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. L. Martin, A. Anguita, N. Graf et al., “ACGT: advancing clinico-genomic trials on cancer—four years of experience,” in User Centred Networked Health Care, vol. 169 of Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, pp. 734–738, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  41. D. Schober, M. Boeker, J. Bullenkamp et al., “The DebugIT core ontology: semantic integration of antibiotics resistance patterns,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 160, part 2, pp. 1060–1064, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  42. D. Ouagne, N. Nadah, D. Schober et al., “Ensuring HL7-based information model requirements within an ontology framework,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 160, part 2, pp. 912–916, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  43. L. Lezcano, M.-A. Sicilia, and C. Rodríguez-Solano, “Integrating reasoning and clinical archetypes using OWL ontologies and SWRL rules,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 343–353, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. Smart Open Services for European Patients (epSOS), June 2015, http://www.epsos.eu/.
  45. O. Bodenreider, “The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 32, pp. D267–D270, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. LexEVS, June 2015, https://wiki.nci.nih.gov/display/LexEVS/LexEVS.
  47. G. B. Laleci, A. Dogac, M. Yuksel et al., “Personalized remote monitoring of the atrial fibrillation patients with electronic implant devices,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 183–196, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. C. Patel, K. Gomadam, S. Khan, and V. Garg, “TrialX: using semantic technologies to match patients to relevant clinical trials based on their personal health records,” Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 342–347, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. C. Patel, J. Cimino, J. Dolby et al., “Matching patient records to clinical trials using ontologies,” in The Semantic Web: 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, November 11–15, 2007. Proceedings, vol. 4825 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 816–829, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  50. A. L. Rector, R. Qamar, and T. Marley, “Binding ontologies and coding systems to electronic health records and messages,” Applied Ontology—Biomedical Ontology in Action, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 51–69, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  51. G. B. Laleci, M. Yuksel, and A. Dogac, “Providing semantic interoperability between clinical care and clinical research domains,” IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 356–369, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. J. F. Ethier, O. Dameron, and V. Curcin, “A unified structural/terminological interoperability framework based on LexEVS: application to TRANSFoRm,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 986–994, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. M. Yuksel, A semantic interoperability framework for reinforcing post market safety studies [Ph.D. thesis in Computer Engineering], Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey, 2013.
  54. IHE, Patient Care Coordination (PCC) CDA Content Modules, June 2015, http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_PCC_Suppl_CDA_Content_Modules.pdf.
  55. W3C, “Resource Description Framework (RDF): Primer,” June 2015, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/.
  56. epSOS: Smart Open services for European Patients, http://www.epsos.eu/.
  57. IHE, “Query for Existing Data Profile (QED),” June 2015, http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_PCC_Query_for_Existing_Data_QED_Supplement_TI_2008-08-22.pdf.
  58. SALUS Deliverable 5.2.2, Query Based Interoperability Profiles and Open Source Toolsets—R2, http://www.srdc.com.tr/projects/salus/docs/D5.2.2.pdf.
  59. HL7, Health Quality Measures Format (HQMF), June 2015, http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/product_brief.cfm?product_id=97.
  60. Ontmalizer, June 2015, https://github.com/srdc/ontmalizer.
  61. HL7. Clinical Document Architecture (CDA), Release 2. http://www.hl7.org/implement/standards/cda.cfm.
  62. T. Berners-Lee and D. Connolly, “Notation3 (N3): A readable RDF syntax,” June 2015, http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/n3/.
  63. W3C, SPARQL Query Language for RDF, June 2015, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/.
  64. HITSP. C 32, HITSP Summary Documents Using HL7 Continuity of Care Document (CCD) Component, http://www.hitsp.org/ConstructSet_Details.aspx?&PrefixAlpha=4&PrefixNumeric=32.
  65. HITSP, “C 83—CDA Content Modules Component,” June 2015, http://www.hitsp.org/ConstructSet_Details.aspx?&PrefixAlpha=4&PrefixNumeric=83.
  66. Implementation Guide for CDA Release 2.0—Consolidated CDA Templates (US Realm), June 2015, http://wiki.hl7.org/images/b/be/CDAConsolidationR12011.zip.
  67. OMOP, Common Data Model (CDM) Specifications, June 2015, http://75.101.131.161/download/loadfile.php?docname=CDM%20Specification%20V4.0.
  68. A. A. Sinaci and G. B. Laleci, “A federated semantic metadata registry framework for enabling interoperability across clinical research and care domains,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 784–794, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. Health Informatics, Harmonized Data Types for Information Interchange (21090), ISO Std, 2011.
  70. SALUS CIM Ontology, June 2015, http://www.salusproject.eu/ontology/salusCIMv2.n3.
  71. Euler Yet another proof Engine (EYE), June 2015, http://eulersharp.sourceforge.net/.
  72. H. Sun, K. Depraetere, J. De Roo, B. De Vloed, G. Mels, and D. Colaert, “Semantic integration and analysis of clinical data,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.4405.
  73. G. Declerck, C. Bousquet, and M.-C. Jaulent, “Automatic generation of MedDRA terms groupings using an ontology,” in Quality of Life through Quality of Information, vol. 180 of Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, pp. 73–77, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. W3C, “SKOS: Simple Knowledge Organization System,” http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/.
  75. Linked Data, “Connect Distributed Data across the Web,” http://linkeddata.org/.
  76. P. L. Whetzel, N. F. Noy, N. H. Shah et al., “BioPortal: enhanced functionality via new Web services from the National Center for Biomedical Ontology to access and use ontologies in software applications,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. W541–W545, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. IHTSDO/WHO SNOMED CT to ICD-10 Cross-Map Project, June 2015, http://ihtsdo.org/news/news-article/article/ihtsdowho-snomed-ct-to-icd-10-cross-map-technology-preview-release/.
  78. H. Sun, J. De Roo, M. Twagirumukiza et al., “Validation rules for assessing and improving SKOS mapping quality,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4156.
  79. SALUS, “D7.2.2 Validation Report for SALUS Pilot Application,” June 2015, http://salusproject.eu/docs/D7.2.2_PilotApplicationValidation_v2.0_FINAL.pdf.
  80. Meaningful Use, June 2015, http://www.cdc.gov/ehrmeaningfuluse/introduction.html.
  81. IHE, “IT Infrastructure Technical Framework,” June 2015, http://www.ihe.net/Technical_Framework/upload/IHE_ITI_TF_Vol1.pdf.
  82. A. Dogac, M. Yuksel, A. Avcl et al., “Electronic health record interoperability as realized in the Turkish health information system,” Methods of Information in Medicine, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 140–149, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. epSOS: Point of Care Database, June 2015, http://www.epsos.eu/point-of-care-database/poc-database.html.
  84. Virtuoso Universal Server, June 2015, http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/.
  85. SALUS, “D2.2.4 Guidance to Green Field Member States for secondary use of EHRs for Post Market Safety Studies,” June 2015, http://salusproject.eu/docs/D2.2.4.pdf.
  86. SALUS Starter-kit, June 2015, http://www.salusproject.eu/resources/salus-project.zip.