Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 7051856, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7051856
Research Article

Role of Extracranial Carotid Duplex and Computed Tomography Perfusion Scanning in Evaluating Perfusion Status of Pericarotid Stenting

1Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua and Graduate Institute of Biological Science and Technology, National Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
2Epidemiology and Biostatistics Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
3Department of Medical Imaging, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
4Institute of Statistics, National Chiao Tung University, 1001 Ta Hsueh Road, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan

Received 31 January 2016; Accepted 17 February 2016

Academic Editor: Aristomenis K. Exadaktylos

Copyright © 2016 Chih-Ming Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Piñero, A. González, F. Moniche et al., “Progressive changes in cerebral perfusion after carotid stenting: a dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion weighted imaging study,” Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 527–532, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Trojanowska, A. Drop, T. Jargiello, J. Wojczal, and M. Szczerbo-Trojanowska, “Changes in cerebral hemodynamics after carotid stenting: evaluation with CT perfusion studies,” Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 169–174, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. The European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group, “MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis,” The Lancet, vol. 337, pp. 1235–1243, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Kluytmans, J. van der Grond, K. J. van Everdingen, C. J. M. Klijn, L. J. Kappelle, and M. A. Viergever, “Cerebral hemodynamics in relation to patterns of collateral flow,” Stroke, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1432–1439, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. Y. Suzuki, M. Nakajima, H. Ikeda, and T. Abe, “Evaluation of hyperacute stroke using perfusion computed tomography,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 333–341, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. Miteff, C. R. Levi, G. A. Bateman, N. Spratt, P. McElduff, and M. W. Parsons, “The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke,” Brain, vol. 132, no. 8, pp. 2231–2238, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. M. Jongen, J. Hendrikse, F. L. Moll, W. P. T. M. Mali, and H. B. van der Worp, “Cerebral perfusion affects the risk of ischemia during carotid artery stenting,” Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 538–545, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. M. Thierfelder, W. H. Sommer, A. B. Baumann et al., “Whole-brain CT perfusion: reliability and reproducibility of volumetric perfusion deficit assessment in patients with acute ischemic stroke,” Neuroradiology, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 827–835, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Duan, G. Li, Y. Yang et al., “Changes in cerebral hemodynamics after carotid stenting of symptomatic carotid artery,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 744–748, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. E. Derchi, G. Leoncini, D. Parodi et al., “Mild renal dysfunction and renal vascular resistance in primary hypertension,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 966–971, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. G. H. Heine, M. K. Gerhart, C. Ulrich, H. Köhler, and M. Girndt, “Renal Doppler resistance indices are associated with systemic atherosclerosis in kidney transplant recipients,” Kidney International, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 878–885, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. G. H. Heine, B. Reichart, C. Ulrich, H. Köhler, and M. Girndt, “Do ultrasound renal resistance indices reflect systemic rather than renal vascular damage in chronic kidney disease?” Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 163–170, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. Kolonko, M. Szotowska, P. Kuczera, J. Chudek, and A. Wiecek, “Extrarenal factors influencing resistance index in stable kidney transplant recipients,” Transplantation, vol. 96, no. 4, pp. 406–412, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. D. Van der Heyden, A. Waaijer, W. Van Es et al., “CT measurement of changes in cerebral perfusion in patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis undergoing carotid stenting prior to cardiac surgery: ‘proof of principle’,” EuroIntervention, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1091–1097, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. F. Gaudiello, V. Colangelo, F. Bolacchi et al., “Sixty-four-section CT cerebral perfusion evaluation in patients with carotid artery stenosis before and after stenting with a cerebral protection device,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 919–923, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. D. G. Nabavi, A. Cenic, R. A. Craen et al., “CT assessment of cerebral perfusion: experimental validation and initial clinical experience,” Radiology, vol. 213, no. 1, pp. 141–149, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Pourcelot, “Applications cliniques de l'examen Doppler transcutane,” in Les Colloques de l'Institute National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale, vol. 34, pp. 213–240, INSERM, 1974.