| Authors | N. cases | Follow-up (months) | Treatment | ESWT parameters | Pain improvement | Functional improvement |
| Rasmussen et al. 2008 [5] | 48 () | 3 | ESWT versus placebo | Low-energy radial ESWT, 4 sessions, 2,000 shots, 0.12–0.51 mJ/mm2, 50 Hz | / | AOFAS +18 points () | Rompe et al. 2008 [6] | 50 () | 12 | ESWT versus eccentric exercises | Low-energy ESWT, 3 sessions, 2000 shots, 0.12 mJ/mm2 | NRS (0–8) | VISA-A +27 points () | Furia 2006 [7] | 68 () | 12 | ESWT versus control | High-energy ESWT, 1 dose, 3000 shocks, 0.21 mJ/mm2, total energy flux density, 604 mJ/mm2 | VAS 7.0 (control) and 2.8 (ESWT) () | Roles-Maudsley () | Taylor et al. 2016 [8] | 56 (46) | 24 | ESWT | Low-energy radial ESWT, 3 sessions, 2000 shots, 10 Hz, 1.5–2.5 bar | VAS (NAT) and (IAT) () | VISA-A +66 points () | The present study | 40 | 12 | ESWT + eccentric exercises | Low-energy radial ESWT, 4 sessions, 800 shots, 4 Hz, 14 KeV | VAS SD () | AOFAS +19.8 ±5.0 SD () |
|
|