Overexpression of<i> AaWRKY1</i> Leads to an Enhanced Content of Artemisinin in<i> Artemisia annua</i>

Jiang, Weimin; Fu, Xueqing; Pan, Qifang; Tang, Yueli; Shen, Qian; Lv, Zongyou; Yan, Tingxiang; Shi, Pu; Li, Ling; Zhang, Lida; Wang, Guofeng; Sun, Xiaofen; Tang, Kexuan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7314971

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 | Article ID 7314971 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7314971

Overexpression of AaWRKY1 Leads to an Enhanced Content of Artemisinin in Artemisia annua

Weimin Jiang,¹Xueqing Fu,¹Qifang Pan,¹Yueli Tang,¹Qian Shen,¹Zongyou Lv,¹Tingxiang Yan,¹Pu Shi,¹Ling Li,¹Lida Zhang,¹Guofeng Wang,¹and Xiaofen Sun¹ et al.

Academic Editor: Xin-yuan Guan

Received16 Jul 2015

Accepted01 Dec 2015

Published23 Feb 2016

Abstract

Artemisinin is an effective component of drugs against malaria. The regulation of artemisinin biosynthesis is at the forefront of artemisinin research. Previous studies showed that AaWRKY1 can regulate the expression of ADS, which is the first key enzyme in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway. In this study, AaWRKY1 was cloned, and it activated ADSpro and CYPpro in tobacco using dual-LUC assay. To further study the function of AaWRKY1, pCAMBIA2300-AaWRKY1 construct under 35S promoter was generated. Transgenic plants containing AaWRKY1 were obtained, and four independent lines with high expression of AaWRKY1 were analyzed. The expression of ADS and CYP, the key enzymes in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway, was dramatically increased in AaWRKY1-overexpressing A. annua plants. Furthermore, the artemisinin yield increased significantly in AaWRKY1-overexpressing A. annua plants. These results showed that AaWRKY1 increased the content of artemisinin by regulating the expression of both ADS and CYP. It provides a new insight into the mechanism of regulation on artemisinin biosynthesis via transcription factors in the future.

1. Introduction

A. annua is an important traditional Chinese herbal plant according to the Chinese materia medica [1]. Artemisinin, extracted from herbal plants A. annua, is an effective component of drugs against malaria. It was discovered by Miller and Su [2]. Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is considered the most effective method against malaria [3]. In recent years, other functions of artemisinin have been reported. For instance, artemisinin might have effects on human cancers [4]. Artemisinin can potentially serve as a drug against hepatitis B virus [5].

The artemisinin biosynthesis pathway has been studied by several groups for many years. The enzymes in the pathway have almost been completely isolated [6, 7]. Through mevalonate pathway (MVA) or nonmevalonate pathway (MEP), the precursor of artemisinin biosynthesis isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) is formed [8]. HMG-CoA Reductase Gene (HMGR) is the rate-limiting enzyme of MVA [9, 10]. IPP and dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) change into each other and form farnesyl diphosphate (FPP) by farnesyl diphosphate synthase (FPS). FPP is converted to amorpha-4,11-diene by amorpha-4,11-diene synthase (ADS), which is the first committed step in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway [11, 12]. Through cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP71AV1 (CYP), amorpha-4,11-diene is oxidized to artemisinic alcohol. Then, artemisinic alcohol is oxidized to artemisinic aldehyde [13]. Artemisinic aldehyde is reduced to its dihydro form, dihydroartemisinic aldehyde, by artemisinic aldehyde (13) reductase (DBR2) [14]. Dihydroartemisinic aldehyde is oxidized to its dihydro acid form, dihydroartemisinic acid (DHAA), through aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH1) [15]. The mechanism behind DHAA converted to artemisinin is still not clear [16]. Besides, the promoters of ADS, CYP, and DBR2 have been cloned [17–22].

Although artemisinin is widely used, the yield of artemisinin cannot meet market demand [23, 24]. Plant metabolic engineering is promising to produce artemisinin. Overexpression of one or more genes in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway increases the yield of artemisinin in transgenic A. annua. Overexpression of HMGR resulted in enhancement of the artemisinin content in transgenic A. annua [25, 26]. FPS overexpressing lines exhibited 3.6-fold higher content of artemisinin than wild plants [27, 28]. Overexpression of DBR2 significantly improved the content of artemisinin to 1.59–2.26 times compared with that in control [29]. Overexpression of HMGR and ADS led to 7.65-fold higher content of artemisinin compared with nontransgenic plants [30]. Stacked overexpression of FPS, CYP, and CPR resulted in 3.6-fold higher content of artemisinin compared with the controls [31]. Downregulation of enzymes competitive with artemisinin biosynthesis also led to an improved yield of artemisinin. The content of artemisinin was increased by downregulation of squalene synthase (SQS), a key enzyme of sterol pathway [32, 33]. The artemisinin content of transgenic A. annua by downregulation of β-caryophyllene synthase (CPS) exhibited an increase of 54.9% compared with the wild plants [34].

Transcription factors are also used in plant metabolic engineering. WRKY transcription factors are one of the largest families of regulatory proteins in plants [35]. WRKY transcription factors contain their DNA binding domain, WRKY domain, which binds to W box (TTGAC[C/T]) [35–37]. WRKYs have many different functions, including biotic stress, abiotic stress, and trichome development [35]. One WRKY transcription factor may regulate several different processes. For example, HvWRKY38 is involved in plant development through gibberellin signaling and abiotic stress [38–40]. LtWRKY21 can activate abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway [41]. Overexpression of OsWRKY45 improved drought tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis [42]. Heat and drought tolerance was enhanced in transgenic rice plants by overexpressing OsWRKY11 [43]. Overexpression of AtWRKY25 or AtWRKY33 increased salt tolerance and ABA sensitivity in transgenic Arabidopsis [44]. Overexpression of AtWRKY25 also exhibited enhanced heat tolerance [45]. Three WRKY transcription factors, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, exhibited differential tolerance to abiotic stresses [46]. BhWRKY1 was involved in the dehydration by binding to the promoter of galactinol synthase [47]. AtWRKY63 was involved in plant responses to ABA and drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis [48]. AtWRKY15 functioned as a negative regulator of osmotic stress responses by mitochondrial retrograde regulation [49]. Many transcription factors were found to regulate key enzymes in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway. They are also quite important in plant metabolic engineering. Both AaERF1/2 and AabZIP1 can bind with the promoter of ADS and CYP and regulate their expression [50–52]. TAR1 could interact with ADS and CYP and further regulate the biosynthesis of artemisinin [53]. Ma et al. found that AaWRKY1 could bind to the W boxes of ADSpro and activate the expression of ADS in transient expression systems [54].

In this study, pCAMBIA2300-AaWRKY1 fusion expression vectors were constructed under the drive of 35S promoter and transformed into A. annua. Transgenic plants overexpressing AaWRKY1 were analyzed. Overexpression of AaWRKY1 led to great enhancement of artemisinin content.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials

The seeds of low artemisinin-yielding A. annua were obtained from our lab. Seeds were sterilized in 75% ethanol for 2-3 min, followed by 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for 8 min, and then washed with sterilized distilled water several times. Seeds were sown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium under a photoperiod of 16 h light/8 h dark at °C. The seedlings were transferred to the soil after 10 days in greenhouse. The young leaves of A. annua plants were collected for RNA extraction. The leaves of plants were collected for DNA extraction 2 months after being transferred to the soil in the growth chamber. Tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) seeds were sown on soil in pots in greenhouse. The leaves of 4-week-old tobaccos were prepared for dual-luciferase assay.

2.2. RNA Extraction and RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the young leaves of A. annua plants using TRIzol Reagent Kit (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Concentration of the A. annua total RNA was measured by a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, USA) and checked by agarose gel electrophoresis. First-strand synthesis of cDNA was carried out by M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA (500 μg) was reverse transcribed with 0.5 μL 50 μM oligo-dT primers. The 1st-strand cDNA was used as template for quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qPCR).

Expression of AaWRKY1 and other enzymes in A. annua was analyzed by qPCR using the fluorescent intercalating dye SYBR-Green (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing) in a detection system (Opticon3, MJ Research). The qPCR was performed as previously described [21, 55]. First single-stranded cDNA was used as the template in 20 μL reaction mixture including 10 μL SYBR Premix Ex and 10 pmol of each primer. The primers used were listed in Table 1. The qPCR was performed first at 95°C (30 sec) with 40 cycles at 95°C (5 sec) and 56°C (30 sec) and finally a dissociation stage at 95°C (15 sec), 56°C (30 sec), and 95°C (15 sec). The data were analyzed by method [56]. The transcript level of A. annua ACTIN was used as the control for qPCR analysis.

2.3. DNA Sequence Analysis

AaWRKY1 was isolated by amplifying the total cDNA with the specific primers AaWRKY1-up and AaWRKY1-down. The acquired sequence was cloned to pJET1.2 vector according to the instructions (Invitrogen, USA). AaWRKY1 sequences were analyzed using Vector NTI software (Invitrogen, USA). Bioinformatics analysis of AaWRKY1 was performed online at the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and EBI database (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/).

2.4. Dual-Luciferase Assay

The reporter and the effectors constructs were performed according to the protocols described before [52, 57]. In this study, 2.9 kb and 2 kb fragments upstream of ATG of ADS and CYP gene were cloned into pGREEN0800 LUC vector, which contain both firefly luciferase (LUC) and renilla (REN) under the 35S promoter. The construct 35S::CFP reporter was used as negative control. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 containing effector constructs (35S-CFP, 35S-AaWRKY1) or reporter constructs was adjusted to OD600 = 0.6 in MS medium with 200 μM acetosyringone and 10 mM MES (pH 5.6). The mixture was incubated for 3 hours in room temperature. Mix the effector and reporter (MS medium/effector/reporter = 2 : 2 : 1, vol/vol/vol) and infiltrate the mixture into 4-week-old tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) leaves. The tobaccos were put in the dark overnight. The leaves of tobacco were collected after 2 days for dual-LUC assay according to the manufacturer (Promega, USA).

2.5. Construction of Overexpression Vectors and A. annua Transformation

The pCAMBIA2300 vector was used for the transformation of A. annua. AaWRKY1 was amplified with specific primers AaWRKY1-up and AaWRKY1-down (Table 1) and then was cloned to the pJET1.2 vector. The pJET1.2-AaWRKY1 construct was digested with Kpn I and Sac I. The small fragment was extracted and was inserted into pCAMBIA2300 vector digested with the same restriction enzymes. The acquired construct pCAMBIA2300-AaWRKY1 was introduced into E. coli DH10b and then was grown in LB medium containing kanamycin. The acquired construct was introduced into A. tumefaciens strain EHA105 by the freeze and thaw method.

The seedlings were collected for stable A. annua transformation when they grew to 5 cm in length. The seedlings were cut into 0.5 cm diameter discs for the cocultivation. The plant transformation was carried out as previously described [21, 32, 58]. The A. tumefaciens strain harboring AaWRKY1 was cocultivated with the leaves discs at 28°C in the dark for 2 days. The explants were washed with water several times after cocultivation. The explants were screened in selective shoot-induction medium MS1 (MS0 + 2 mg/L N⁶-benzoyladenine + 0.2 mg/L naphthalene-1-acetic acid + 50 mg/L kanamycin). The plantlets acquired were transferred into rooting medium MS2 (MS0 + 0.3 mg/L naphthalene-1-acetic acid) for root induction. When roots were formed, regenerated A. annua plants were transferred into soil in the growth chamber. After genomic DNAs were extracted by CTAB method [55, 59], using primers 35S and AaWRKY1-down (Table 1), AaWRKY1 transgenic plants were identified by PCR analysis.

2.6. Artemisinin Quantification

The 10th leaves from apical meristem on the main stem of five A. annua plants were collected. The leaves were immerged in 5 mL chloroform in 15 mL tubes. The mixture was shaken for 5 min. The leaves from the tubes were collected and weighed when they dried completely in drying oven at 50°C. The extract was also dried completely in fume hood and then dissolved in 3 mL methanol, followed by ultrasonic treatment with 35 W at 40°C. The final supernatant was filtered through a 0.25 μm filter.

For each sample, 20 μL of the filtrate was injected into an injection port of HPLC. The samples were analyzed using a Waters Alliance 2695 HPLC system coupled with a Waters 2420 ELSD detector (Milford, USA). The filtrate was separated on a 5 μm C18 column with 1 mL/min flow rate. A mixture of 60% (v/v) methanol in water was used as mobile phase. The ELSD conditions were optimized at a nebulizer gas pressure of 345 kPa and a drift tube temperature of 45°C. The content of artemisinin was indicated as mg/g dry weight (DW). Three biological repeats were measured for each sample.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Cloning of AaWRKY1

According to the previous study of AaWRKY1 (GenBank accession number FJ390842), AaWRKY1 gene sequence was amplified by PCR using A. annua cDNAs as templates, reversely transcribed from total RNAs. The sequence was acquired from low artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. 38 obtained from our lab, using primers AaWRKY1-up and AaWRKY1-down. Then, it was cloned into pJET1.2 vector and sequenced.

The acquired WRKY gene contained 936 bp open reading frame (ORF) sequence and encoded a protein of 311 amino acids. Alignment of the protein sequences of the acquired WRKY with the other two cloned WRKYs showed that they had high similarity on protein sequences. Four amino acids are different between the acquired WRKY and AaWRKY1, and five amino acids are different between the acquired WRKY and another AaWRKY1 cloned by Han et al. in 2014 [60]. The putative WRKY motif and the amino acid residues which form the zinc finger were conserved in all the three WRKYs (data not shown). Although there are some differences in these sequences, the similarity among these three genes was more than 97% and the WRKY motif and the amino acid residues which formed the zinc finger were identical. Therefore, we consider that they are alleles of AaWRKY1 from different ecotypes of A. annua.

3.2. AaWRKY1 Was Induced by MeJA

Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) is an effective elicitor in artemisinin biosynthesis [61]. The expression of ADS and CYP, the two key enzymes of artemisinin biosynthetic pathway, was activated by MeJA. The expression level of ADS was increased rapidly and peaked in 1 h after treatment, while the expression of CYP was induced slowly and peaked in 9 h after treatment [51]. In this study, the expression of AaWRKY1 and AaWRKY3 (accession number GU299481) previously cloned in our lab was tested. The expression of AaWRKY1 was increased rapidly and peaked in 1 h after treatment with 100 μM MeJA (Figure 1(a)), while the expression of AaWRKY3 was not changed at the same condition (Figure 1(b)). Ma et al. reported that the expression of ADS was rapidly induced by 0.3 mM MeJA in 0.5 h and peaked by semiquantitative RT-PCR.

(a)

(b)

JA is linked with artemisinin biosynthesis and trichome initiation and development. JA promoted the formation of both glandular and filamentous trichomes [61]. JA also increased the expression of artemisinin biosynthesis genes [61–63]. Many transcription factors induced by JA have been reported to regulate the artemisinin biosynthesis. AaERF1/2 could bind with the promoters of ADS and CYP and increased the accumulation of artemisinin in overexpression plants [51]. AaORA positively regulated the expression of ADS, CYP, and DBR2 and significantly increased the content of artemisinin in overexpression plants [50]. These transcription factors above are strongly induced by JA rapidly. In this study, the expression of AaWRKY1 was also increased rapidly by JA. These results suggested that AaWRKY1 might regulate artemisinin biosynthesis via MeJA.

3.3. AaWRKY1 Activated the Expression of ADS and CYP in Tobacco

In order to investigate the function of AaWRKY1, a dual-luciferase (dual-LUC) assay was performed in transient tobacco expression system. The promoters of ADS and CYP, named ADSpro and CYPpro, were ligated to the pGREEN0800-LUC vector as the reporters, respectively. For the negative control, a CFP protein under the 35S promoter was coinfiltrated with reporters. AaWRKY1 activated the expression of the ADS and CYP promoters by showing higher value of LUC/REN compared with the CFP control in tobacco (Figure 2). The expression of AaWRKY1 plus ADSpro sample was increased to 9.3-fold compared with the CFP control (Figure 2(a)). The expression of AaWRKY1 plus CYPpro sample was increased to 2.4-fold compared with the CFP control (Figure 2(b)). These results showed that AaWRKY1 activated both ADS and CYP promoters in plants.

(a)

(b)

AabZIP1 can bind with the promoters of ADS and CYP in tobacco and can improve the content of artemisinin in overexpressing transgenic plants [52]. AaWRKYs might have the same function in overexpressing transgenic plants. Ma et al. showed that AaWRKY1 binds with ADSpro and activates the expression of ADSpro in tobacco [54]. The promoter of CYP, the second key enzyme in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway, was cloned in 2012 [18]. Two putative W boxes were found in the promoters of ADS and CYP [17, 18]. This indicates that AaWRKY1 might bind with the promoters of ADS and CYP on W box site. In this study, AaWRKY1 activates the expression of ADS and CYP promoters in vivo. This suggests that AaWRKY1 might regulate the content of artemisinin in plants by regulating the expression of ADS and CYP.

3.4. Stable Transformation and PCR Analysis

To investigate the function of AaWRKY1 in artemisinin biosynthesis, pCAMBIA2300-AaWRKY1 expression vector was constructed (Figure 3). The acquired construct was stably transformed into A. annua by A. tumefaciens-mediated leaf-disc transformation method. The leaf discs were used as explants (Figure 4(a)) and were cocultivated at 28°C in the dark for 48 hours. The shoots were regenerated after changing the selective shoot-induction medium every two weeks (Figures 4(b)-4(c)). The roots were formed in rooting medium every two weeks (Figure 4(d)). Then, the rooted plantlets were transferred into soil for further growth (Figure 4(e)). Seventy-six plants acquired were analyzed. Thirty-five transgenic A. annua plants overexpressing AaWRKY1 on kanamycin-selective medium were obtained and confirmed by PCR (data not shown). Four independent transgenic lines with high expression level of AaWRKY1 were used for further analysis (Figures 5 and 6(a)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(a)

(b)

3.5. Expression of Enzymes and the Content of Artemisinin in Transgenic Plants

In AaWRKY1-overexpressing transgenic plants, the expression of AaWRKY1 was greatly increased by about 50- to 90-fold compared with that in the nontransgenic control plants (Figure 6(a)). There were no obvious differences in plant height and morphology between transgenic plants and wild type plants.

The expression of the key enzymes in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway was also measured. Compared with that of nontransgenic control plants, the expression of ADS was increased by 1.5- to 3.0-fold, while the expression of CYP was increased by 4.4- to 14.0-fold (Figure 6(b)).

Furthermore, the content of artemisinin in the transgenic plants overexpressing AaWRKY1 was measured. Artemisinin content in transgenic plants was significantly higher than that in nontransgenic control plants. The artemisinin content was increased by 1.3- to 2.0-fold compared with nontransgenic control plants (Figure 7).

Previous studies showed that AaWRKY1 could bind to the promoter of ADS and activate the expression of enzymes in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway using transient expression systems [54]. Under the 35S promoter, the content of artemisinin in transgenic plants containing AaWRKY1 was slightly increased in the background of high artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. Chongqing [60]. The content of artemisinin in transgenic plants containing AaWRKY1 was greatly increased in the background of low artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. 38 in this study. At the same time, only the expression of CYP was increased in transgenic plants containing AaWRKY1 in the background of high artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. Chongqing, while both expression levels of ADS and CYP were increased in transgenic plants containing AaWRKY1 in the background of low artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. 38. This may explain why the artemisinin yield was dramatically increased in low artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. 38 in this study. It indicates that some other coactivators existed in low artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. 38 or corepressors existed in high artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. Chongqing to regulate the expression of key enzymes in artemisinin biosynthetic pathway together with AaWRKY1. Alternatively, the differences of AaWRKY1 or promoters between high artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. Chongqing and low artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. 38 could also lead to the different content in transgenic plants. Therefore, AaWRKY1 could regulate ADS and CYP promoters, so it could greatly improve the content of artemisinin in low artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. 38.

4. Conclusions

In sum, AaWRKY1 could regulate the expression of both ADS and CYP in low artemisinin-yielding A. annua var. 38 and greatly increase the yield of artemisinin. These results may provide some new insight into the research on plant metabolic engineering in the future.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by China National High-Tech “863” Program (Grant no. 2011AA100605), Shanghai Key Discipline Cultivation and Construction Project (Horticulture), and Shanghai Jiao Tong University Agri-Engineering Program.

References

E. Hsu, “The history of qing hao in the Chinese materia medica,” Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 505–508, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. H. Miller and X. Su, “Artemisinin: discovery from the Chinese herbal garden,” Cell, vol. 146, no. 6, pp. 855–858, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bhattarai, A. S. Ali, S. P. Kachur et al., “Impact of artemisinin-based combination therapy and insecticide-treated nets on malaria burden in Zanzibar,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 1784–1790, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. P. Singh and H. C. Lai, “Artemisinin induces apoptosis in human cancer cells,” Anticancer Research, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 2277–2280, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
M. R. Romero, T. Efferth, M. A. Serrano et al., “Effect of artemisinin/artesunate as inhibitors of hepatitis B virus production in an ‘in vitro’ replicative system,” Antiviral Research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 75–83, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Covello, K. H. Teoh, D. R. Polichuk, D. W. Reed, and G. Nowak, “Functional genomics and the biosynthesis of artemisinin,” Phytochemistry, vol. 68, no. 14, pp. 1864–1871, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Arsenault, D. Vail, K. K. Wobbe, K. Erickson, and P. J. Weathers, “Reproductive development modulates gene expression and metabolite levels with possible feedback inhibition of artemisinin in Artemisia annua,” Plant Physiology, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 958–968, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Towler and P. J. Weathers, “Evidence of artemisinin production from IPP stemming from both the mevalonate and the nonmevalonate pathways,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2129–2136, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chappell, F. Wolf, J. Proulx, R. Cuellar, and C. Saunders, “Is the reaction catalyzed by 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase a rate-limiting step for isoprenoid biosynthesis in plants?” Plant Physiology, vol. 109, no. 4, pp. 1337–1343, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Schaller, B. Grausem, P. Benveniste et al., “Expression of the Hevea brasiliensis (H.B.K.) Müll. Arg. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase 1 in tobacco results in sterol overproduction,” Plant Physiology, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 761–770, 1995.
View at: Google Scholar
H. J. Bouwmeester, T. E. Wallaart, M. H. A. Janssen et al., “Amorpha-4,11-diene synthase catalyses the first probable step in artemisinin biosynthesis,” Phytochemistry, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 843–854, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. E. Wallaart, H. J. Bouwmeester, J. Hille, L. Poppinga, and N. C. A. Maijers, “Amorpha-4,11-diene synthase: cloning and functional expression of a key enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of the novel antimalarial drug artemisinin,” Planta, vol. 212, no. 3, pp. 460–465, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Teoh, D. R. Polichuk, D. W. Reed, G. Nowak, and P. S. Covello, “Artemisia annua L. (Asteraceae) trichome-specific cDNAs reveal CYP71AV1, a cytochrome P450 with a key role in the biosynthesis of the antimalarial sesquiterpene lactone artemisinin,” FEBS Letters, vol. 580, no. 5, pp. 1411–1416, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhang, K. H. Teoh, D. W. Reed et al., “The molecular cloning of artemisinic aldehyde Δ11(13) reductase and its role in glandular trichome-dependent biosynthesis of artemisinin in Artemisia annua,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 31, pp. 21501–21508, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. H. Teoh, D. R. Polichuk, D. W. Reed, and P. S. Covello, “Molecular cloning of an aldehyde dehydrogenase implicated in artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua,” Botany, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 635–642, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-K. Sy and G. D. Brown, “The mechanism of the spontaneous autoxidation of dihydroartemisinic acid,” Tetrahedron, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 897–908, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-H. Kim, Y.-J. Chang, and S.-U. Kim, “Tissue specificity and developmental pattern of amorpha-4,11-diene synthase (ADS) proved by ADS promoter-driven GUS expression in the heterologous plant, Arabidopsis thaliana,” Planta Medica, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 188–193, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, J. Han, S. Kanagarajan, A. Lundgren, and P. E. Brodelius, “Trichome-specific expression of the amorpha-4,11-diene 12-hydroxylase (cyp71av1) gene, encoding a key enzyme of artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua, as reported by a promoter-GUS fusion,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 81, no. 1-2, pp. 119–138, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, L. Olofsson, A. Lundgren, and P. E. Brodelius, “Trichome-specific expression of amorpha-4,11-diene synthase, a key enzyme of artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L., as reported by a promoter-GUS fusion,” American Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 619–628, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, K. Yang, F. Jing et al., “Cloning and characterization of trichome-specific promoter of cpr71av1 gene involved in artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L,” Molecular Biology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 751–758, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Jiang, X. Lu, B. Qiu et al., “Molecular cloning and characterization of a trichome-specific promoter of artemisinic aldehyde Δ11(13) reductase (DBR2) in Artemisia annua,” Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Yang, R. S. Monafared, H. Wang, A. Lundgren, and P. E. Brodelius, “The activity of the artemisinic aldehyde Δ11(13) reductase promoter is important for artemisinin yield in different chemotypes of Artemisia annua L.,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 325–340, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Covello, “Making artemisinin,” Phytochemistry, vol. 69, no. 17, pp. 2881–2885, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Z. Abdin, M. Israr, R. U. Rehman, and S. K. Jain, “Artemisinin, a novel antimalarial drug: biochemical and molecular approaches for enhanced production,” Planta Medica, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 289–299, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Aquil, A. M. Husaini, M. Z. Abdin, and G. M. Rather, “Overexpression of the HMG-CoA reductase gene leads to enhanced artemisinin biosynthesis in transgenic Artemisia annua plants,” Planta Medica, vol. 75, no. 13, pp. 1453–1458, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nafis, M. Akmal, M. Ram et al., “Enhancement of artemisinin content by constitutive expression of the HMG-CoA reductase gene in high-yielding strain of Artemisia annua L,” Plant Biotechnology Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Banyai, C. Kirdmanee, M. Mii, and K. Supaibulwatana, “Overexpression of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase (FPS) gene affected Artemisinin content and growth of Artemisia annua L,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 255–265, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-L. Han, B.-Y. Liu, H.-C. Ye, H. Wang, Z.-Q. Li, and G.-F. Li, “Effects of overexpression of the endogenous farnesyl diphosphate synthase on the artemisinin content in Artemisia annua L,” Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 482–487, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yuan, W. Liu, Q. Zhang et al., “Overexpression of artemisinic aldehyde Δ11 (13) reductase gene-enhanced artemisinin and its relative metabolite biosynthesis in transgenic Artemisia annua L.,” Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Alam and M. Z. Abdin, “Over-expression of HMG-CoA reductase and amorpha-4,11-diene synthase genes in Artemisia annua L. and its influence on artemisinin content,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1919–1928, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Chen, Q. Shen, Y. Wang et al., “The stacked over-expression of FPS, CYP71AV1 and CPR genes leads to the increase of artemisinin level in Artemisia annua L.,” Plant Biotechnology Reports, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 287–295, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhang, F. Jing, F. Li et al., “Development of transgenic Artemisia annua (Chinese worm-wood) plants with an enhanced content of artemisinin, an effective anti-malarial drug, by hairpin-RNA-mediated gene silencing,” Biotechnology and Applied Biochemistry, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 199–207, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L.-L. Feng, R.-Y. Yang, X.-Q. Yang, X.-M. Zeng, W.-J. Lu, and Q.-P. Zeng, “Synergistic re-channeling of mevalonate pathway for enhanced artemisinin production in transgenic Artemisia annua,” Plant Science, vol. 177, no. 1, pp. 57–67, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-L. Chen, H.-M. Fang, Y.-P. Ji et al., “Artemisinin biosynthesis enhancement in transgenic Artemisia annua plants by downregulation of the β-caryophyllene synthase gene,” Planta Medica, vol. 77, no. 15, pp. 1759–1765, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Rushton, I. E. Somssich, P. Ringler, and Q. J. Shen, “WRKY transcription factors,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 247–258, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Eulgem, P. J. Rushton, S. Robatzek, and I. E. Somssich, “The WRKY superfamily of plant transcription factors,” Trends in Plant Science, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 199–206, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Ülker and I. E. Somssich, “WRKY transcription factors: from DNA binding towards biological function,” Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 491–498, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Marè, E. Mazzucotelli, C. Crosatti, E. Francia, A. M. Stanca, and L. Cattivelli, “Hv-WRKY38: a new transcription factor involved in cold- and drought-response in barley,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 399–416, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Xie, Z.-L. Zhang, S. Hanzlik, E. Cook, and Q. J. Shen, “Salicylic acid inhibits gibberellin-induced alpha-amylase expression and seed germination via a pathway involving an abscisic-acid-inducible WRKY gene,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 293–303, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zou, D. Neuman, and Q. J. Shen, “Interactions of two transcriptional repressors and two transcriptional activators in modulating gibberellin signaling in aleurone cells,” Plant Physiology, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 176–186, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zou, J. R. Seemann, D. Neuman, and Q. J. Shen, “A WRKY gene from creosote bush encodes an activator of the abscisic acid signaling pathway,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 53, pp. 55770–55779, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Qiu and D. Yu, “Over-expression of the stress-induced OsWRKY45 enhances disease resistance and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis,” Environmental and Experimental Botany, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 35–47, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wu, Y. Shiroto, S. Kishitani, Y. Ito, and K. Toriyama, “Enhanced heat and drought tolerance in transgenic rice seedlings overexpressing OsWRKY11 under the control of HSP101 promoter,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Jiang and M. K. Deyholos, “Functional characterization of Arabidopsis NaCl-inducible WRKY25 and WRKY33 transcription factors in abiotic stresses,” Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 69, no. 1-2, pp. 91–105, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Li, Q. Fu, W. Huang, and D. Yu, “Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis transcription factor WRKY25 in heat stress,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 683–693, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q.-Y. Zhou, A.-G. Tian, H.-F. Zou et al., “Soybean WRKY-type transcription factor genes, GmWRKY13, GmWRKY21, and GmWRKY54, confer differential tolerance to abiotic stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis plants,” Plant Biotechnology Journal, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 486–503, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Wang, Y. Zhu, L. Wang et al., “A WRKY transcription factor participates in dehydration tolerance in Boea hygrometrica by binding to the W-box elements of the galactinol synthase (BhGolS1) promoter,” Planta, vol. 230, no. 6, pp. 1155–1166, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Ren, Z. Chen, Y. Liu et al., “ABO3, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates plant responses to abscisic acid and drought tolerance in Arabidopsis,” Plant Journal, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 417–429, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Vanderauwera, K. Vandenbroucke, A. Inzé et al., “AtWRKY15 perturbation abolishes the mitochondrial stress response that steers osmotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 109, no. 49, pp. 20113–20118, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Lu, L. Zhang, F. Zhang et al., “AaORA, a trichome-specific AP2/ERF transcription factor of Artemisia annua, is a positive regulator in the artemisinin biosynthetic pathway and in disease resistance to Botrytis cinerea,” New Phytologist, vol. 198, no. 4, pp. 1191–1202, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z.-X. Yu, J.-X. Li, C.-Q. Yang, W.-L. Hu, L.-J. Wang, and X.-Y. Chen, “The jasmonate-responsive AP2/ERF transcription factors AaERF1 and AaERF2 positively regulate artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua L.,” Molecular Plant, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 353–365, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zhang, X. Fu, Z. Lv et al., “A basic leucine zipper transcription factor, aabzip1, connects abscisic acid signaling with artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua,” Molecular Plant, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 163–175, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tan, L. Xiao, S. Gao et al., “Trichome and artemisinin regulator 1 is required for trichome development and artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua,” Molecular Plant, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 1396–1411, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ma, G. Pu, C. Lei et al., “Isolation and characterization of AaWRKY1, an Artemisia annua transcription factor that regulates the amorpha-4,11-diene synthase gene, a key gene of artemisinin biosynthesis,” Plant and Cell Physiology, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2146–2161, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Lu, W. Jiang, L. Zhang et al., “Characterization of a novel ERF transcription factor in Artemisia annua and its induction kinetics after hormones and stress treatments,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 9521–9527, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. J. Livak and T. D. Schmittgen, “Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method,” Methods, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 402–408, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-Y. Zhang, S.-B. He, L. Li, and H.-Q. Yang, “Auxin inhibits stomatal development through MONOPTEROS repression of a mobile peptide gene STOMAGEN in mesophyll,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 29, pp. E3015–E3023, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Vergauwe, R. Cammaert, D. Vandenberghe et al., “Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Artemisia annua L. and regeneration of transgenic plants,” Plant Cell Reports, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 929–933, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Porebski, L. G. Bailey, and B. R. Baum, “Modification of a CTAB DNA extraction protocol for plants containing high polysaccharide and polyphenol components,” Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Han, H. Wang, A. Lundgren, and P. E. Brodelius, “Effects of overexpression of AaWRKY1 on artemisinin biosynthesis in transgenic Artemisia annua plants,” Phytochemistry, vol. 102, pp. 89–96, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Maes, F. C. W. Van Nieuwerburgh, Y. Zhang et al., “Dissection of the phytohormonal regulation of trichome formation and biosynthesis of the antimalarial compound artemisinin in Artemisia annua plants,” New Phytologist, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 176–189, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. A. Soetaert, C. M. F. Van Neste, M. L. Vandewoestyne et al., “Differential transcriptome analysis of glandular and filamentous trichomes in Artemisia annua,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 13, article 220, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Olofsson, A. Engström, A. Lundgren, and P. E. Brodelius, “Relative expression of genes of terpene metabolism in different tissues of Artemisia annua L,” BMC Plant Biology, vol. 11, article 45, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2016 Weimin Jiang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2267

Downloads

1499

Citations