Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 7893413, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7893413
Research Article

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Results from a Series of Young Patients

1Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery “Paride Stefanini”, Policlinico Umberto I, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy
2Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine Surgery and Neurological Sciences, Policlinico Le Scotte, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy

Received 27 June 2016; Revised 19 August 2016; Accepted 4 September 2016

Academic Editor: George N. Kouvelos

Copyright © 2016 Pasqualino Sirignano et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. C. Parodi, J. C. Palmaz, and H. D. Barone, “Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 491–499, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Diehm, A. I. Tsoukas, B. T. Katzen et al., “Matched-pair analysis of endovascular versus open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in young patients at low risk,” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 645–651, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. T. Sachs, M. Schermerhorn, F. Pomposelli, P. Cotterill, J. O'Malley, and B. Landon, “Resident and fellow experiences after the introduction of endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 881–888, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. Karthikesalingam, P. J. Holt, A. Vidal-Diez et al., “Predicting aortic complications after endovascular aneurysm repair,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 100, no. 10, pp. 1302–1311, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Torsello, N. Troisi, K. P. Donas, and M. Austermann, “Evaluation of the Endurant stent graft under instructions for use vs off-label conditions for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 300–306, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. T. Lee, B. W. Ullery, C. K. Zarins, C. Olcott IV, E. J. Harris Jr., and R. L. Dalman, “EVAR deployment in anatomically challenging necks outside the IFU,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 65–73, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Speziale, P. Sirignano, F. Setacci et al., “Immediate and two-year outcomes after EVAR in ‘on-label’ and ‘off-label’ neck anatomies using different commercially available devices. Analysis of the experience of two italian vascular centers,” Annals of Vascular Surgery, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1892–1900, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. M. Greenhalgh, L. C. Brown, and J. T. Powell, “Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, pp. 1863–1871, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. D. Blankensteijn, S. E. C. A. de Jong, M. Prinssen et al., “Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 23, pp. 2398–2405, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. L. De Bruin, A. Baas, J. Buth et al., “For DREAM Study Group. Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, pp. 1881–1889, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. F. A. Lederle, J. A. Freischlag, T. C. Kyriakides et al., “Outcomes following endovascular vs open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: a randomized trial,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 302, no. 14, pp. 1535–1542, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. F. Lederle, J. Freischlag, T. Kyriakides et al., “Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 367, pp. 1988–1997, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J.-P. Becquemin, J.-C. Pillet, F. Lescalie et al., “A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1167–1173.e1, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. C. V. Paravastu, R. Jayarajasingam, R. Cottam, S. J. Palfreyman, J. A. Michaels, and S. M. Thomas, “Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 1, Article ID CD004178, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. N. V. Dias, K. Ivancev, M. Malina, T. Resch, B. Lindblad, and B. Sonesson, “Does the wide application of endovascular AAA repair affect the results of open surgery?” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 188–194, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. N. Altaf, S. Abisi, Y. Yong, J. H. Saunders, B. D. Braithwaite, and S. T. MacSweeney, “Mid-term results of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the young,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 315–319, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. R. M. Sandford, E. Choke, M. J. Bown, and R. D. Sayers, “What is the best option for elective repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm in a young fit patient?” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 13–18, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Lee, E. Tang, L. Dubois, A. H. Power, G. DeRose, and T. L. Forbes, “Durability and survival are similar after elective endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in younger patients,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 636–641, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Kontopodis, S. A. Antoniou, E. Georgakarakos, and C. V. Ioannou, “Endovascular vs open aneurysm repair in the young: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 897–904, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. P. De Rango, “Younger is better for elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, but...,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 513–514, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. L. Schwarze, Y. Shen, J. Hemmerich, and W. Dale, “Age-related trends in utilization and outcome of open and endovascular repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in the United States, 2001–2006,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 722–729, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. L. Moll, J. T. Powell, G. Fraedrich et al., “Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 41, supplement 1, pp. S1–S58, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. F. Setacci, P. Sirignano, A. Cappelli, and C. Setacci, “The wonders of a newly available post-analysis CT software in the hands of vascular surgeons,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 404–406, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. Setacci, P. Sirignano, V. Kamargianni et al., “Inguinal field block for femoral artery exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 655–662, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. A. Mazzei, S. Guerrini, F. G. Mazzei et al., “Follow-up of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair: preliminary validation of digital tomosynthesis and contrast enhanced ultrasound in detection of medium- to long-term complications,” World Journal of Radiology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 530–536, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. P. K. Gupta, B. Ramanan, T. G. Lynch et al., “Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm does not improve early survival versus open repair in patients younger than 60 years,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 506–512, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. F. Biancari, A. Catania, and V. D'Andrea, “Elective endovascular vs. open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients aged 80 years and older: systematic review and meta-analysis,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 571–576, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Vallabhaneni and M. A. Farber, “Part one: for the motion. young patients with good risk factors should be treated with EVAR,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 614–617, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J.-B. Ricco and T. L. Forbes, “Trans-Atlantic debate: should young patients with good risk factors be treated with EVAR?” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 622–623, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. F. Verzini, G. Isernia, P. De Rango et al., “Abdominal aortic endografting beyond the trials: a 15-year single-center experience comparing newer to older generation stent-grafts,” Journal of Endovascular Therapy, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 439–447, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. H. A. White and S. MacDonald, “Estimating risk associated with radiation exposure during follow-up after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR),” Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 95–104, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. Habets, H. J. A. Zandvoort, J. B. Reitsma et al., “Magnetic resonance imaging is more sensitive than computed tomography angiography for the detection of endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a systematic review,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 340–350, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. Perini, I. Sediri, M. Midulla et al., “Single-centre prospective comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and computed tomography angiography after EVAR,” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 797–802, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus