Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 8285428, 27 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8285428
Research Article

Next Generation Sequencing Identifies Five Major Classes of Potentially Therapeutic Enzymes Secreted by Lucilia sericata Medical Maggots

1Department of Bioresources, Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology, Winchesterstraße 2, 35394 Giessen, Germany
2Department of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Knöll-Straße 8, 07745 Jena, Germany
3Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Bioinformatics and System Biology, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 58, 35392 Giessen, Germany
4Justus-Liebig-University of Giessen, Institute for Insect Biotechnology, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 26-32, 35392 Giessen, Germany

Received 29 January 2016; Accepted 7 March 2016

Academic Editor: Yudong Cai

Copyright © 2016 Zdeněk Franta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. C. T. Church, “The traditional use of maggots in wound healing, and the development of larva therapy (biosurgery) in modern medicine,” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 525–527, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. A. Sherman, M. J. R. Hall, and S. Thomas, “Medicinal maggots: an ancient remedy for some contemporary afflictions,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 45, pp. 55–81, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Edwards and S. Stapley, “Debridement of diabetic foot ulcers,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 1, Article ID CD003556, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. L. Marineau, M. T. Herrington, K. M. Swenor, and L. J. Eron, “Maggot debridement therapy in the treatment of complex diabetic wounds,” Hawaii Medical Journal, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 121–124, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Wilasrusmee, M. Marjareonrungrung, S. Eamkong et al., “Maggot therapy for chronic ulcer: a retrospective cohort and a meta-analysis,” Asian Journal of Surgery, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 138–147, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J.-H. Hwang, H. N. Modi, S.-W. Suh, J.-Y. Hong, J.-H. Yang, and J.-H. Park, “Maggot debridement therapy for postsurgical wound infection in scoliosis: a case series in five patients,” Spine, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 313–319, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. N. Akhtar, S. Abdel-Rehim, J. Rodrigues, and P. Brooks, “The use of larvae therapy to debride full thickness burns in the anaesthetically unfit patient: the Nottingham experience,” Burns, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. e44–e49, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. N. Namias, J. E. Varela, R. P. Varas, O. Quintana, and C. G. Ward, “Biodebridement: a case report of maggot therapy for limb salvage after fourth-degree burns,” Journal of Burn Care and Rehabilitation, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 254–257, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. R. A. Sherman, “Mechanisms of maggot-induced wound healing: what do we know, and where do we go from here?” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 592419, 13 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Cazander, D. I. Pritchard, Y. Nigam, W. Jung, and P. H. Nibbering, “Multiple actions of Lucilia sericata larvae in hard-to-heal wounds: larval secretions contain molecules that accelerate wound healing, reduce chronic inflammation and inhibit bacterial infection,” BioEssays, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1083–1092, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Y. Mumcuoglu, A. Ingber, L. Gilead et al., “Maggot therapy for the treatment of intractable wounds,” International Journal of Dermatology, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 623–627, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. A. Sherman, “Maggot versus conservative debridement therapy for the treatment of pressure ulcers,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 208–214, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Steenvoorde, C. E. Jacobi, L. Van Doorn, and J. Oskam, “Maggot debridement therapy of infected ulcers: patient and wound factors influencing outcome—a study on 101 patients with 117 wounds,” Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 596–602, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. Chambers, S. Woodrow, A. P. Brown et al., “Degradation of extracellular matrix components by defined proteinases from the greenbottle larva Lucilia sericata used for the clinical debridement of non-healing wounds,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Telford, A. P. Brown, R. A. M. Seabra et al., “Degradation of eschar from venous leg ulcers using a recombinant chymotrypsin from Lucilia sericata,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 163, no. 3, pp. 523–531, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Telford, A. P. Brown, A. Kind, J. S. C. English, and D. I. Pritchard, “Maggot chymotrypsin I from Lucilia sericata is resistant to endogenous wound protease inhibitors,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 164, no. 1, pp. 192–196, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. A. Pöppel, M. Kahl, A. Baumann et al., “A Jonah-like chymotrypsin from the therapeutic maggot Lucilia sericata plays a role in wound debridement and coagulation,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 70, pp. 138–147, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. B. Altincicek and A. Vilcinskas, “Septic injury-inducible genes in medicinal maggots of the green blow fly Lucilia sericata,” Insect Molecular Biology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 119–125, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. Huberman, N. Gollop, K. Y. Mumcuoglu et al., “Antibacterial substances of low molecular weight isolated from the blowfly, Lucilia sericata,” Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 127–131, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. L. Huberman, N. Gollop, K. Y. Mumcuoglu, C. Block, and R. Galun, “Antibacterial properties of whole body extracts and haemolymph of Lucilia sericata maggots,” Journal of Wound Care, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 123–127, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A.-K. Pöppel, H. Vogel, J. Wiesner, and A. Vilcinskas, “Antimicrobial peptides expressed in medicinal maggots of the blow fly Lucilia sericata show combinatorial activity against bacteria,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 2508–2514, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A.-K. Pöppel, A. Koch, K.-H. Kogel et al., “Lucimycin, an antifungal peptide from the therapeutic maggot of the common green bottle fly Lucilia sericata,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 395, no. 6, pp. 649–656, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. K. Y. Mumcuoglu, J. Miller, M. Mumcuoglu, M. Friger, and M. Tarshis, “Destruction of bacteria in the digestive tract of the maggot of Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae),” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 161–166, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. I. Valachova, P. Takac, and J. Majtan, “Midgut lysozymes of Lucilia sericata-new antimicrobials involved in maggot debridement therapy,” Insect Molecular Biology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 779–787, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. A. Bexfield, Y. Nigam, S. Thomas, and N. A. Ratcliffe, “Detection and partial characterisation of two antibacterial factors from the excretions/secretions of the medicinal maggot Lucilia sericata and their activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA),” Microbes and Infection, vol. 6, no. 14, pp. 1297–1304, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. S. Andersen, D. Sandvang, K. M. Schnorr et al., “A novel approach to the antimicrobial activity of maggot debridement therapy,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 1646–1654, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Bexfield, A. E. Bond, E. C. Roberts et al., “The antibacterial activity against MRSA strains and other bacteria of a <500 Da fraction from maggot excretions/secretions of Lucilia sericata (Diptera: Calliphoridae),” Microbes and Infection, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 325–333, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. J. A. van der Plas, G. N. Jukema, S.-W. Wai et al., “Maggot excretions/secretions are differentially effective against biofilms of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 117–122, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. G. Harris, A. Bexfield, Y. Nigam, H. Rohde, N. A. Ratcliffe, and D. Mack, “Disruption of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms by medicinal maggot Lucilia sericata excretions/secretions,” International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 32, no. 9, pp. 555–564, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. Cazander, M. C. van de Veerdonk, C. M. J. E. Vandenbroucke-Grauls, M. W. J. Schreurs, and G. N. Jukema, “Maggot excretions inhibit biofilm formation on biomaterials,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 468, no. 10, pp. 2789–2796, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Bohova, J. Majtan, V. Majtan, and P. Takac, “Selective antibiofilm effects of Lucilia sericata larvae secretions/excretions against wound pathogens,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 857360, 9 pages, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Brown, A. Horobin, D. G. Blount et al., “Blow fly Lucilia sericata nuclease digests DNA associated with wound slough/eschar and with Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm,” Medical and Veterinary Entomology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 432–439, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. G. Harris, Y. Nigam, J. Sawyer, D. Mack, and D. I. Pritchard, “Lucilia sericata chymotrypsin disrupts protein adhesin-mediated staphylococcal biofilm formation,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 79, no. 4, pp. 1393–1395, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. J. Horobin, K. M. Shakesheff, S. Woodrow, C. Robinson, and D. I. Pritchard, “Maggots and wound healing: an investigation of the effects of secretions from Lucilia sericata larvae upon interactions between human dermal fibroblasts and extracellular matrix components,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 148, no. 5, pp. 923–933, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. A. J. Horobin, K. M. Shakesheff, and D. I. Pritchard, “Promotion of human dermal fibroblast migration, matrix remodelling and modification of fibroblast morphology within a novel 3D model by Lucilia sericata larval secretions,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1410–1418, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. P. E. Prete, “Growth effects of Phaenicia sericata larval extracts on fibroblasts: mechanism for wound healing by maggot therapy,” Life Sciences, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 505–510, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Z. Zhang, S. Wang, Y. Diao, J. Zhang, and D. Lv, “Fatty acid extracts from Lucilia sericata larvae promote murine cutaneous wound healing by angiogenic activity,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 9, article 24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. A. Bexfield, A. E. Bond, C. Morgan et al., “Amino acid derivatives from Lucilia sericata excretions/secretions may contribute to the beneficial effects of maggot therapy via increased angiogenesis,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 162, no. 3, pp. 554–562, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. G. Cazander, M. W. J. Schreurs, L. Renwarin, C. Dorresteijn, D. Hamann, and G. N. Jukema, “Maggot excretions affect the human complement system,” Wound Repair and Regeneration, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 879–886, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. J. Pečivová, T. Mačičková, P. Takáč, M. Kovácsová, D. Cupaníková, and M. Kozánek, “Effect of the extract from salivary glands of Lucilia sericata on human neutrophils,” Neuroendocrinology Letters, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 794–797, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. J. A. van der Plas, A. M. van der Does, M. Baldry et al., “Maggot excretions/secretions inhibit multiple neutrophil pro-inflammatory responses,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 507–514, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. J. A. van der Plas, M. Baldry, J. T. van Dissel, G. N. Jukema, and P. H. Nibbering, “Maggot secretions suppress pro-inflammatory responses of human monocytes through elevation of cyclic AMP,” Diabetologia, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1962–1970, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. M. J. A. van der Plas, J. T. van Dissel, and P. H. Nibbering, “Maggot secretions skew monocyte-macrophage differentiation away from a pro-inflammatory to a pro-angiogenic type,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 11, Article ID e0008071, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. J. A. van der Plas, A. S. Andersen, S. Nazir et al., “A novel serine protease secreted by medicinal maggots enhances plasminogen activator-induced fibrinolysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e92096, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. M. Kahl, A. Gökçen, S. Fischer et al., “Maggot excretion products from the blowfly Lucilia sericata contain contact phase/intrinsic pathway-like proteases with procoagulant functions,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 277–288, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. de la Paz Celorio-Mancera, C. W. Wheat, H. Vogel, L. Söderlind, N. Janz, and S. Nylin, “Mechanisms of macroevolution: polyphagous plasticity in butterfly larvae revealed by RNA-Seq,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 4884–4895, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. Babraham Bioinformatics, “FastQC—a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data,” http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
  48. A. M. Bolger, M. Lohse, and B. Usadel, “Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data,” Bioinformatics, vol. 30, no. 15, pp. 2114–2120, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. M. G. Grabherr, B. J. Haas, M. Yassour et al., “Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 644–652, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. M. H. Schulz, D. R. Zerbino, M. Vingron, and E. Birney, “Oases: robust de novo RNA-seq assembly across the dynamic range of expression levels,” Bioinformatics, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1086–1092, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. D. Gilbert, “EvidentialGene: tr2aacds, mRNA Transcript Assembly Software,” 2013, http://arthropods.eugenes.org/EvidentialGene/about/EvidentialGene_trassembly_pipe.html.
  52. W. Li and A. Godzik, “Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences,” Bioinformatics, vol. 22, no. 13, pp. 1658–1659, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. G. Parra, K. Bradnam, and I. Korf, “CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes,” Bioinformatics, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1061–1067, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. F. Altschul, T. L. Madden, A. A. Schäffer et al., “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, no. 17, pp. 3389–3402, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. S. T. O'Neil and S. J. Emrich, “Assessing De Novo transcriptome assembly metrics for consistency and utility,” BMC Genomics, vol. 14, no. 1, article 465, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. “TransposonPSI: An Application of PSI-Blast to Mine (Retro-)Transposon ORF Homologies,” http://transposonpsi.sourceforge.net/.
  57. S. R. Eddy, “A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference,” Genome Informatics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 205–211, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. R. D. Finn, J. Mistry, J. Tate et al., “The Pfam protein families database,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 38, no. 1, Article ID gkp985, pp. D211–D222, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. E. M. Zdobnov, M. Campillos, E. D. Harrington, D. Torrents, and P. Bork, “Protein coding potential of retroviruses and other transposable elements in vertebrate genomes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 946–954, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. O. Rupp, J. Becker, K. Brinkrolf et al., “Construction of a public CHO cell line transcript database using versatile bioinformatics analysis pipelines,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID e85568, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. “Enzyme Nomenclature,” http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iubmb/enzyme/.
  62. N. D. Rawlings, M. Waller, A. J. Barrett, and A. Bateman, “MEROPS: the database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. D503–D509, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. J. D. Hunter, “Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment,” Computing in Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID 4160265, pp. 99–104, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. Matplotlib, “Color example code: colormaps_reference.py,” http://matplotlib.org/examples/color/colormaps_reference.html.
  65. A. Baumann, R. Lehmann, A. Beckert, A. Vilcinskas, and Z. Franta, “Selection and evaluation of tissue specific reference genes in Lucilia sericata during an immune challenge,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 8, Article ID e0135093, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. M. W. Pfaffl, “A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 29, no. 9, article e45, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. “MEROPS: the peptidase database,” http://merops.sanger.ac.uk/.
  68. N. D. Rawlings and A. J. Barrett, “MEROPS: the peptidase database,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 325–331, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. N. D. Rawlings and G. S. Salvesen, Eds., Handbook of Proteolytic Enzymes, Elsevier, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2013.
  70. A. J. Barrett and N. D. Rawlings, “'Species' of peptidases,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 388, no. 11, pp. 1151–1157, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. A. J. Barrett, N. D. Rawlings, and E. A. O'Brien, “The MEROPS database as a protease information system,” Journal of Structural Biology, vol. 134, no. 2-3, pp. 95–102, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. P. B. Szecsi, “The aspartic proteases,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, Supplement, vol. 210, pp. 5–22, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. M. H. P. Padilha, A. C. Pimentel, A. F. Ribeiro, and W. R. Terra, “Sequence and function of lysosomal and digestive cathepsin D-like proteinases of Musca domestica midgut,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 782–791, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. H. Zhu, C. A. Hart, D. Sales, and N. B. Roberts, “Bacterial killing in gastric juice—effect of pH and pepsin on Escherichia coli and Helicobacter pylori,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 1265–1270, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. W. Xia and M. S. Wolfe, “Intramembrane proteolysis by presenilin and presenilin-like proteases,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 116, no. 14, pp. 2839–2844, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. A. L. Brunkan and A. M. Goate, “Presenilin function and γ-secretase activity,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 769–792, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. D. J. Casso, S. Tanda, B. Biehs, B. Martoglio, and T. B. Kornberg, “Drosophila signal peptide peptidase is an essential protease for larval development,” Genetics, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 139–148, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. D. Bernard, B. Méhul, A. Thomas-Collignon, C. Delattre, M. Donovan, and R. Schmidt, “Identification and characterization of a novel retroviral-like aspartic protease specifically expressed in human epidermis,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 278–287, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. A.-M. Lennon-Duménil, A. H. Bakker, P. Wolf-Bryant, H. L. Ploegh, and C. Lagaudrière-Gesbert, “A closer look at proteolysis and MHC-class-II-restricted antigen presentation,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. M. Fonović and B. Turk, “Cysteine cathepsins and extracellular matrix degradation,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1840, no. 8, pp. 2560–2570, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. H. Wu, X. Che, Q. Zheng et al., “Caspases: a molecular switch node in the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1072–1083, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. O. Vasiljeva, T. Reinheckel, C. Peters, D. Turk, V. Turk, and B. Turk, “Emerging roles of cysteine cathepsins in disease and their potential as drug targets,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 387–403, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. H. Saito, S. Kurata, and S. Natori, “Purification and characterization of a hemocyte proteinase of Sarcophaga, possibly participating in elimination of foreign substances,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 209, no. 3, pp. 939–944, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. C. Serbielle, S. Moreau, F. Veillard et al., “Identification of parasite-responsive cysteine proteases in Manduca sexta,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 390, no. 5-6, pp. 493–502, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. W.-L. Cho, S.-M. Tsao, A. R. Hays et al., “Mosquito cathepsin B-like protease involved in embryonic degradation of vitellin is produced as a latent extraovarian precursor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 19, pp. 13311–13321, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. D. Sojka, Z. Franta, M. Horn, C. R. Caffrey, M. Mareš, and P. Kopáček, “New insights into the machinery of blood digestion by ticks,” Trends in Parasitology, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 276–285, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. C. Fialho Mdo, W. R. Terra, N. R. Moreira, J. C. Zanuncio, and J. E. Serrão, “Ultrastructure and immunolocalization of digestive enzymes in the midgut of Podisus nigrispinus(Heteroptera: Pentatomidae),” Arthropod Structure and Development, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 277–285, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. A. G. Martynov, E. N. Elpidina, L. Perkin, and B. Oppert, “Functional analysis of C1 family cysteine peptidases in the larval gut of Tenebrio molitor and Tribolium castaneum,” BMC Genomics, vol. 16, no. 1, article 75, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. W. R. Terra and C. Ferreira, “Biochemistry and molecular biology of digestion,” in Insect Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, L. I. Gilbert, Ed., Elsevier, San Diego, Calif, USA, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  90. Y. Abe, K. Shirane, H. Yokosawa et al., “Asparaginyl endopeptidase of jack bean seeds. Purification, characterization, and high utility in protein sequence analysis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 268, no. 5, pp. 3525–3529, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. C. R. Caffrey, M. A. Mathieu, A. M. Gaffney et al., “Identification of a cDNA encoding an active asparaginyl endopeptidase of Schistosoma mansoni and its expression in Pichia pastoris,” FEBS Letters, vol. 466, no. 2-3, pp. 244–248, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. J.-M. Chen, P. M. Dando, N. D. Rawlings et al., “Cloning, isolation, and characterization of mammalian legumain, an asparaginyl endopeptidase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 12, pp. 8090–8098, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. D. Sojka, O. Hajdušek, J. Dvořák et al., “IrAE-an asparaginyl endopeptidase (legumain) in the gut of the hard tick Ixodes ricinus,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 713–724, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. J.-M. Chen, M. Fortunato, and A. J. Barrett, “Activation of human prolegumain by cleavage at a C-terminal asparagine residue,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 352, part 2, pp. 327–334, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. C. Watts, S. P. Matthews, D. Mazzeo, B. Manoury, and C. X. Moss, “Asparaginyl endopeptidase: case history of a class II MHC compartment protease,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 207, pp. 218–228, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. M. Sajid, J. H. McKerrow, E. Hansell et al., “Functional expression and characterization of Schistosoma mansoni cathepsin B and its trans-activation by an endogenous asparaginyl endopeptidase,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 131, no. 1, pp. 65–75, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. M. Horn, M. Nussbaumerová, M. Šanda et al., “Hemoglobin digestion in blood-feeding ticks: mapping a multipeptidase pathway by functional proteomics,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1053–1063, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. M. J. McConville and A. K. Menon, “Recent developments in the cell biology and biochemistry of glycosylphosphatidylinositol lipids (review),” Molecular Membrane Biology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. W. C. Earnshaw, L. M. Martins, and S. H. Kaufmann, “Mammalian caspases: structure, activation, substrates, and functions during apoptosis,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 68, pp. 383–424, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. D. Xu, S. E. Woodfield, T. V. Lee, Y. Fan, C. Antonio, and A. Bergmann, “Genetic control of programmed cell death (apoptosis) in Drosophila,” Fly, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 78–90, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. S. Kumar and J. Doumanis, “The fly caspases,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 1039–1044, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. H. Sorimachi, S. Hata, and Y. Ono, “Expanding members and roles of the calpain superfamily and their genetically modified animals,” Experimental Animals, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 549–566, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. P. M. Cummins and B. O'Connor, “Pyroglutamyl peptidase: an overview of the three known enzymatic forms,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology, vol. 1429, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. C. Nusslein-Volhard and E. Wieschaus, “Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila,” Nature, vol. 287, no. 5785, pp. 795–801, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. T. R. Bürglin, “The Hedgehog protein family,” Genome Biology, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 241, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. T. Lang, E. Schaeffeler, D. Bernreuther, M. Bredschneider, D. H. Wolf, and M. Thumm, “Aut2p and Aut7p, two novel microtubule-associated proteins are essential for delivery of autophagic vesicles to the vacuole,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 17, no. 13, pp. 3597–3607, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. M. Y. Balakirev, S. O. Tcherniuk, M. Jaquinod, and J. Chroboczek, “Otubains: a new family of cysteine proteases in the ubiquitin pathway,” EMBO Reports, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 517–522, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. K. S. Makarova, L. Aravind, and E. V. Koonin, “A novel superfamily of predicted cysteine proteases from eukaryotes, viruses and Chlamydia pneumoniae,” Trends in Biochemical Sciences, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 50–52, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. M. J. Page and E. Di Cera, “Evolution of peptidase diversity,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 44, pp. 30010–30014, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. S. Dalal, D. R. T. Ragheb, F. D. Schubot, and M. Klemba, “A naturally variable residue in the S1 subsite of M1 family aminopeptidases modulates catalytic properties and promotes functional specialization,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 36, pp. 26004–26012, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. W. R. Terra and C. Ferreira, “Insect digestive enzymes: properties, compartmentalization and function,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 1–62, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. P. Denolf, K. Hendrickx, J. Van Damme et al., “Cloning and characterization of Manduca sexta and Plutella xylostella midgut aminopeptidase N enzymes related to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin-binding proteins,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 248, no. 3, pp. 748–761, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. R. Rajagopal, N. Agrawal, A. Selvapandiyan, S. Sivakumar, S. Ahmad, and R. K. Bhatnagar, “Recombinantly expressed isoenzymic aminopeptidases from Helicoverpa armigera (American cotton bollworm) midgut display differential interaction with closely related Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal proteins,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 370, no. 3, pp. 971–978, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. A. Aroonkesorn, K. Pootanakit, G. Katzenmeier, and C. Angsuthanasombat, “Two specific membrane-bound aminopeptidase N isoforms from Aedes aegypti larvae serve as functional receptors for the Bacillus thuringiensis Cry4Ba toxin implicating counterpart specificity,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 461, no. 2, pp. 300–306, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. M. Budatha, G. Meur, and A. Dutta-Gupta, “A novel aminopeptidase in the fat body of the moth Achaea janata as a receptor for Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxins and its comparison with midgut aminopeptidase,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 405, no. 2, pp. 287–297, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. T. J. Ningshen, R. K. Chaitanya, P. P. Hari, P. S. Vimala Devi, and A. Dutta-Gupta, “Characterization and regulation of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry toxin binding aminopeptidases N (APNs) from non-gut visceral tissues, Malpighian tubule and salivary gland: comparison with midgut-specific APN in the moth Achaea janata,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 166, no. 3-4, pp. 194–202, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. T. J. Ningshen, P. Aparoy, V. R. Ventaku, and A. Dutta-Gupta, “Functional interpretation of a non-gut hemocoelic tissue aminopeptidase n (APN) in a lepidopteran insect pest Achaea janata,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e79468, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. N. S. Lamango and R. E. Isaac, “Identification and properties of a peptidyl dipeptidase in the housefly, Musca domestica, that resembles mammalian angiotensin-converting enzyme,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 299, no. 3, pp. 651–657, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. R. E. Isaac, N. S. Lamango, U. Ekbote et al., “Angiotensin-converting enzyme as a target for the development of novel insect growth regulators,” Peptides, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 153–162, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. E. Lemeire, B. Vanholme, T. Van Leeuwen, J. Van Camp, and G. Smagghe, “Angiotensin-converting enzyme in Spodoptera littoralis: molecular characterization, expression and activity profile during development,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 166–175, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. R. E. Isaac, U. Ekbote, D. Coates, and A. D. Shirras, “Insect angiotensin-converting enzyme. A processing enzyme with broad substrate specificity and a role in reproduction,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 897, pp. 342–347, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. R. Aguilar, A. E. Jedlicka, M. Mintz, V. Mahairaki, A. L. Scott, and G. Dimopoulos, “Global gene expression analysis of Anopheles gambiae responses to microbial challenge,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 709–719, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. N. Macours, K. Hens, C. Francis, A. De Loof, and R. Huybrechts, “Molecular evidence for the expression of angiotensin converting enzyme in hemocytes of Locusta migratoria: stimulation by bacterial lipopolysaccharide challenge,” Journal of Insect Physiology, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 739–746, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. W. Wang, L. Luo, H. Lu, S. Chen, L. Kang, and F. Cui, “Angiotensin-converting enzymes modulate aphid-plant interactions,” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, article 8885, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. N. Macours and K. Hens, “Zinc-metalloproteases in insects: ACE and ECE,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 501–510, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. M. J. Cornell, T. A. Williams, N. S. Lamango et al., “Cloning and expression of an evolutionary conserved single-domain angiotensin converting enzyme from Drosophila melanogaster,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 23, pp. 13613–13619, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. C. Harrison and K. R. Acharya, “ACE for all—a molecular perspective,” Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 195–210, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. D. M. Gordon, A. Dancis, and D. Pain, “Mechanisms of mitochondrial protein import,” Essays in Biochemistry, vol. 36, pp. 61–73, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. I. A. York, A. X. Y. Mo, K. Lemerise et al., “The cytosolic endopeptidase, thimet oligopeptidase, destroys antigenic peptides and limits the extent of MHC class I antigen presentation,” Immunity, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 429–440, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. C. Yao, J. E. Donelson, and M. E. Wilson, “The major surface protease (MSP or GP63) of Leishmania sp. Biosynthesis, regulation of expression, and function,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. B. S. McGwire, K.-P. Chang, and D. M. Engman, “Migration through the extracellular matrix by the parasitic protozoan Leishmania is enhanced by surface metalloprotease gp63,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 1008–1010, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. B. McHugh, S. A. Krause, B. Yu et al., “Invadolysin: a novel, conserved metalloprotease links mitotic structural rearrangements with cell migration,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 167, no. 4, pp. 673–686, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. J. M. Maidment, D. Moore, G. P. Murphy, G. Murphy, and I. M. Clark, “Matrix metalloproteinase homologues from Arabidopsis thaliana. Expression and activity,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 49, pp. 34706–34710, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. A. A. Leontovich, J. Zhang, K.-I. Shimokawa, H. Nagase, and M. P. Sarras Jr., “A novel hydra matrix metalloproteinase (HMMP) functions in extracellular matrix degradation, morphogenesis and the maintenance of differentiated cells in the foot process,” Development, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 907–920, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. B. Altincicek, M. Fischer, M. Fischer et al., “Role of matrix metalloproteinase ZMP-2 in pathogen resistance and development in Caenorhabditis elegans,” Developmental and Comparative Immunology, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 1160–1169, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. R. Visse and H. Nagase, “Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, function, and biochemistry,” Circulation Research, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 827–839, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. H. Hua, M. Li, T. Luo, Y. Yin, and Y. Jiang, “Matrix metalloproteinases in tumorigenesis: an evolving paradigm,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 68, no. 23, pp. 3853–3868, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  138. C. López-Otín and L. M. Matrisian, “Emerging roles of proteases in tumour suppression,” Nature Reviews Cancer, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 800–808, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. E. Llano, A. M. Pendas, P. Aza-Blanc, T. B. Kornberg, and C. Lopez-Otin, “Dm1-MMP, a matrix metalloproteinase from Drosophila with a potential role in extracellular matrix remodeling during neural development,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 46, pp. 35978–35985, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. E. Llano, G. Adam, A. M. Pendás et al., “Structural and enzymatic characterization of Drosophila Dm2-MMP, a membrane-bound matrix metalloproteinase with tissue-specific expression,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 26, pp. 23321–23329, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. E. Knorr, H. Schmidtberg, A. Vilcinskas, and B. Altincicek, “MMPs regulate both development and immunity in the Tribolium model insect,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 3, Article ID e4751, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. B. Altincicek and A. Vilcinskas, “Identification of a lepidopteran matrix metalloproteinase with dual roles in metamorphosis and innate immunity,” Developmental and Comparative Immunology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 400–409, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. A. Page-McCaw, “Remodeling the model organism: matrix metalloproteinase functions in invertebrates,” Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 14–23, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. F. X. Gomis-Rüth, “Structural aspects of the metzincin clan of metalloendopeptidases,” Molecular Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 157–202, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. J. S. Bond and R. J. Beynon, “The astacin family of metalloendopeptidases,” Protein Science, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 1247–1261, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. D. F. Seals and S. A. Courtneidge, “The ADAMs family of metalloproteases: multidomain proteins with multiple functions,” Genes and Development, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 7–30, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. M. L. Moss and J. W. Bartsch, “Therapeutic benefits from targeting of ADAM family members,” Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 23, pp. 7227–7235, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. Y. Zhu, T. J. Johnson, A. A. Myers, and M. R. Kanost, “Identification by subtractive suppression hybridization of bacteria-induced genes expressed in Manduca sexta fat body,” Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 541–559, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. C. L. Wilson, A. D. Shirras, and R. E. Isaac, “Extracellular peptidases of imaginal discs of Drosophila melanogaster,” Peptides, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 2007–2014, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  150. J. L. Sitnik, C. Francis, K. Hens, R. Huybrechts, M. F. Wolfner, and P. Callaerts, “Neprilysins: an evolutionarily conserved family of metalloproteases that play important roles in reproduction in Drosophila,” Genetics, vol. 196, no. 3, pp. 781–797, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  151. R. E. Isaac, N. D. Bland, and A. D. Shirras, “Neuropeptidases and the metabolic inactivation of insect neuropeptides,” General and Comparative Endocrinology, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 8–17, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. C. Ferreira, K. G. O. Rebola, C. Cardoso, I. Bragatto, A. F. Ribeiro, and W. R. Terra, “Insect midgut carboxypeptidases with emphasis on S10 hemipteran and M14 lepidopteran carboxypeptidases,” Insect Molecular Biology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 222–239, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  153. J. A. Affholter, V. A. Fried, and R. A. Roth, “Human insulin-degrading enzyme shares structural and functional homologies with E. coli protease III,” Science, vol. 242, no. 4884, pp. 1415–1418, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  154. M. Matsui, J. H. Fowler, and L. L. Walling, “Leucine aminopeptidases: diversity in structure and function,” Biological Chemistry, vol. 387, no. 12, pp. 1535–1544, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. T. Hatta, N. Tsuji, T. Miyoshi, M. A. Alim, M. K. Islam, and K. Fujisaki, “Leucine aminopeptidase in the ixodid tick Haemaphysalis longicornis: endogenous expression profiles in midgut,” Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 589–594, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  156. E. McCarthy, C. Stack, S. M. Donnelly et al., “Leucine aminopeptidase of the human blood flukes, Schistosoma mansoni and Schistosoma japonicum,” International Journal for Parasitology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 703–714, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  157. J.-Y. Lee, S.-M. Song, J.-W. Seok et al., “M17 leucine aminopeptidase of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax,” Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology, vol. 170, no. 1, pp. 45–48, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  158. A. C. Seegmiller, I. Dobrosotskaya, J. L. Goldstein, Y. K. Ho, M. S. Brown, and R. B. Rawson, “The SREBP pathway in Drosophila: regulation by palmitate, not sterols,” Developmental Cell, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 229–238, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  159. J. F. Bazan, L. H. Weaver, S. L. Roderick, R. Huber, and B. W. Matthews, “Sequence and structure comparison suggest that methionine aminopeptidase, prolidase, aminopeptidase P, and creatinase share a common fold,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 2473–2477, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  160. E. C. Griffith, Z. Su, B. E. Turk et al., “Methionine aminopeptidase (type 2) is the common target for angiogenesis inhibitors AGM-1470 and ovalicin,” Chemistry and Biology, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 461–471, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  161. K. Fujimura-Kamada, F. J. Nouvet, and S. Michaelis, “A novel membrane-associated metalloprotease, Ste24p, is required for the first step of NH2-terminal processing of the yeast a-factor precursor,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. 271–285, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. V. L. Boyartchuk, M. N. Ashby, and J. Rine, “Modulation of Ras and a-factor function by carboxyl-terminal proteolysis,” Science, vol. 275, no. 5307, pp. 1796–1800, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  163. M. Smyth and G. O'Cuinn, “Dipeptidyl aminopeptidase III of guinea-pig brain: specificity for short oligopeptide sequences,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 1439–1445, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  164. C. Mazzocco, K. M. Fukasawa, A.-A. Raymond, and J. Puiroux, “Purification, partial sequencing and characterization of an insect membrane dipeptidyl aminopeptidase that degrades the insect neuropeptide proctolin,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 268, no. 18, pp. 4940–4949, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  165. C. Mazzocco, J. Gillibert-Duplantier, V. Neaud et al., “Identification and characterization of two dipeptidyl-peptidase III isoforms in Drosophila melanogaster,” FEBS Journal, vol. 273, no. 5, pp. 1056–1064, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  166. E. Seemüller, A. Lupas, D. Stock, J. Löwe, R. Huber, and W. Baumeister, “Proteasome from Thermoplasma acidophilum: a threonine protease,” Science, vol. 268, no. 5210, pp. 579–582, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  167. M. H. Glickman and A. Ciechanover, “The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 373–428, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  168. I. Mononen, K. J. Fisher, V. Kaartinen, and N. N. Aronson Jr., “Aspartylglycosaminuria: protein chemistry and molecular biology of the most common lysosomal storage disorder of glycoprotein degradation,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 1247–1256, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  169. M. J. Page and E. Di Cera, “Serine peptidases: classification, structure and function,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 65, no. 7-8, pp. 1220–1236, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  170. L. Cerenius and K. Söderhäll, “The prophenoloxidase-activating system in invertebrates,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 198, pp. 116–126, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  171. R. A. Patterson, M. T. Juarez, A. Hermann, R. Sasik, G. Hardiman, and W. McGinnis, “Serine proteolytic pathway activation reveals an expanded ensemble of wound response genes in Drosophila,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e61773, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  172. Z. Zou, D. L. Lopez, M. R. Kanost, J. D. Evans, and H. Jiang, “Comparative analysis of serine protease-related genes in the honey bee genome: possible involvement in embryonic development and innate immunity,” Insect Molecular Biology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 603–614, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  173. D. N. Amin, S. G. Kamita, G. M. Muluvi, J. Machuka, B. D. Hammock, and E. O. Osir, “Glossina proteolytic lectin does not require a carbohydrate moiety for enzymatic or trypanosome-transforming activities,” Journal of Medical Entomology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 301–308, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  174. I.-H. Jang, N. Chosa, S.-H. Kim et al., “A Spätzle-processing enzyme required for toll signaling activation in drosophila innate immunity,” Developmental Cell, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 45–55, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  175. P. Ligoxygakis, N. Pelte, J. A. Hoffmann, and J.-M. Reichhart, “Activation of Drosophila toll during fungal infection by a blood serine protease,” Science, vol. 297, no. 5578, pp. 114–116, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  176. Z. Kambris, S. Brun, I.-H. Jang et al., “Drosophila immunity: a large-scale in vivo RNAi screen identifies five serine proteases required for toll Activation,” Current Biology, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 808–813, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  177. B. Lemaitre and J. Hoffmann, “The host defense of Drosophila melanogaster,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 25, pp. 697–743, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  178. L. L. Lindsay, J. C. Yang, and J. L. Hedrick, “Ovochymase, a Xenopus laevis egg extracellular protease, is translated as part of an unusual polyprotease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 20, pp. 11253–11258, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  179. S. Misra, P. Hecht, R. Maeda, and K. V. Anderson, “Positive and negative regulation of Easter, a member of the serine protease family that controls dorsal-ventral patterning in the Drosophila embryo,” Development, vol. 125, no. 7, pp. 1261–1267, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  180. G. Didelot, F. Molinari, P. Tchénio et al., “Tequila, a neurotrypsin ortholog, regulates long-term memory formation in Drosophila,” Science, vol. 313, no. 5788, pp. 851–853, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  181. T. Igaki, Y. Suzuki, N. Tokushige, H. Aonuma, R. Takahashi, and M. Miura, “Evolution of mitochondrial cell death pathway: proapoptotic role of HtrA2/Omi in Drosophila,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 356, no. 4, pp. 993–997, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  182. J. Shan, L. Yuan, Q. Xiao et al., “TSP50, a possible protease in human testes, is activated in breast cancer epithelial cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 290–294, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  183. J. G. Stoffolano Jr. and A. T. Haselton, “The adult dipteran crop: a unique and overlooked organ,” Annual Review of Entomology, vol. 58, pp. 205–225, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  184. D. I. Pritchard and A. P. Brown, “Degradation of MSCRAMM target macromolecules in VLU slough by Lucilia sericata chymotrypsin 1 (ISP) persists in the presence of tissue gelatinase activity,” International Wound Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 414–421, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  185. D. I. Pritchard, V. Čeřovský, Y. Nigam et al., “TIME management by medicinal larvae,” International Wound Journal, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  186. G. Thomas, “Furin at the cutting edge: from protein traffic to embryogenesis and disease,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 753–766, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  187. F. Couture, A. Kwiatkowska, Y. L. Dory, and R. Day, “Therapeutic uses of furin and its inhibitors: a patent review,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 379–396, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  188. J. A. García-Horsman, P. T. Männistö, and J. I. Venäläinen, “On the role of prolyl oligopeptidase in health and disease,” Neuropeptides, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  189. P. Fajtová, S. Štefanić, M. Hradilek et al., “Prolyl oligopeptidase from the blood fluke Schistosoma mansoni: from functional analysis to anti-schistosomal inhibitors,” PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, vol. 9, no. 6, Article ID e0003827, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  190. S. Gottesman, S. Wickner, and M. R. Maurizi, “Protein quality control: triage by chaperones and proteases,” Genes and Development, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 815–823, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  191. S. G. Roudiak, A. Seth, N. Knipfer, and T. E. Shrader, “The Lon protease from Mycobacterium smegmatis: molecular cloning, sequence analysis, functional expression, and enzymatic characterization,” Biochemistry, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 377–386, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  192. Z. Shariat-Madar, F. Mahdi, and A. H. Schmaier, “Recombinant prolylcarboxypeptidase activates plasma prekallikrein,” Blood, vol. 103, no. 12, pp. 4554–4561, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  193. P. Novak and I. K. Dev, “Degradation of a signal peptide by protease IV and oligopeptidase A,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 170, no. 11, pp. 5067–5075, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  194. T. H. Carter and C. G. Miller, “Aspartate-specific peptidases in Salmonella typhimurium: mutants deficient in peptidase E,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 453–459, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  195. K. Håkansson, A. H.-J. Wang, and C. G. Miller, “The structure of aspartyl dipeptidase reveals a unique fold with a Ser-His-Glu catalytic triad,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 97, no. 26, pp. 14097–14102, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  196. S. Urban, J. R. Lee, and M. Freeman, “Drosophila rhomboid-1 defines a family of putative intramembrane serine proteases,” Cell, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 173–182, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  197. S. Urban, J. R. Lee, and M. Freeman, “A family of rhomboid intramembrane proteases activates all Drosophila membrane-tethered EGF ligands,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 21, no. 16, pp. 4277–4286, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  198. I. Valachova, T. Majtan, P. Takac, and J. Majtan, “Identification and characterisation of different proteases in Lucilia sericata medicinal maggots involved in maggot debridement therapy,” Journal of Applied Biomedicine, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 171–177, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  199. K. Katoh and D. M. Standley, “MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 772–780, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus