Table 3: Biochemical data of the groups.

GroupsBUNCrNGAL

Group I (nondiabetic sham)
()
49.83 ± 21.80
44.20
31.90–95.60
0.46 ± 0.18
0.44
0.27–0.80
446.43 ± 179.17
386.00
314.00–839.00

Group II (diabetic sham)
()
68.52 ± 15.07
72.20
39.30–83.50
0.43 ± 0.21
0.39
0.24–0.82
350.17 ± 35.62
352.5
295.00–395.00

Group III (diabetic IR)
()
79.62 ± 14.93
78.20
62.10–101.70
0.62 ± 0.20
0.66
0.29–0.83
891.17 ± 1308.03
363.50
296.00–3560.00

Group IV (diabetic IR + LIPC)
()
84.68 ± 16.79
89.75
52.00–96.80
0.81 ± 0.80
0.81
0.69–0.91
1107.40 ± 1294.21
412
397.00–3385.00

  values
0.0860.5670.153
0.0220.1530.568
0.0320.0100.167
0.4230.1280.423
0.0370.0160.006
0.4230.0650.201

Group I: nondiabetic sham, Group II: diabetic sham, Group III (diabetic IR): renal ischemia/reperfusion injury in diabetic rats group, Group IV (diabetic IR + DIPC): renal ischemia/reperfusion injury in diabetic rats group and local ischemia preconditioning, BUN: blood urea nitrogen, and serum NGAL: Cr: blood creatinine level, Mann-Whitney test was conducted to compare two independent groups. Values are mean ± 1 SD, median, minimum, and maximum.
: comparison of nondiabetic sham and diabetic sham.
: comparison of nondiabetic sham and diabetic IR.
: comparison of nondiabetic sham and diabetic IR + LIPC.
: comparison of diabetic sham and diabetic IR.
: comparison of diabetic sham and diabetic IR + LIPC.
: comparison of diabetic IR and diabetic IR + LIPC.