Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 8651918, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8651918
Research Article

Diversity of Virulence Factors Associated with West Australian Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Isolates of Human Origin

1School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Science, Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley Campus, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
2School of Health, Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia

Received 1 May 2015; Revised 1 July 2015; Accepted 12 July 2015

Academic Editor: Carla R. Arciola

Copyright © 2016 Charlene Babra Waryah et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

An extensive array of virulence factors associated with S. aureus has contributed significantly to its success as a major nosocomial pathogen in hospitals and community causing variety of infections in affected patients. Virulence factors include immune evading capsular polysaccharides, poly-N-acetyl glucosamine, and teichoic acid in addition to damaging toxins including hemolytic toxins, enterotoxins, cytotoxins, exfoliative toxin, and microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM). In this investigation, 31 West Australian S. aureus isolates of human origin and 6 controls were analyzed for relative distribution of virulence-associated genes using PCR and/or an immunoassay kit and MSCRAMM by PCR-based typing. Genes encoding MSCRAMM, namely, Spa, ClfA, ClfB, SdrE, SdrD, IsdA, and IsdB, were detected in >90% of isolates. Gene encoding α-toxin was detected in >90% of isolates whereas genes encoding β-toxin and SEG were detectable in 50–60% of isolates. Genes encoding toxin proteins, namely, SEA, SEB, SEC, SED, SEE, SEH, SEI, SEJ, TSST, PVL, ETA, and ETB, were detectable in >50% of isolates. Use of RAPD-PCR for determining the virulence factor-based genetic relatedness among the isolates revealed five cluster groups confirming genetic diversity among the MSSA isolates, with the greatest majority of the clinical S. aureus (84%) isolates clustering in group IIIa.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a frequent opportunistic pathogen known to cause a wide variety of diseases ranging from skin infections such as boils and carbuncles to more serious infections such as toxic shock syndrome, endocarditis, pneumonia, and sepsis [14]. This has led to the emergence of S. aureus as a common cause of hospital acquired and community acquired infections [5, 6].

The pathogenesis of S. aureus is attributed to several virulence factors including biofilm formation and associated prolonged persistence of antibiotic resistance and the production of a wide array of toxins [5, 7]. A biofilm or slime, defined as a congregation of microorganisms residing in a protective extracellular matrix [8, 9], constitutes the first step in initial attachment followed by colonization and subsequent infection. Colonization is commonly associated with an assortment of adherence factors or adhesins which aid bacterial attachment to the host surface using microbial surface component recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMM). Over 20 different MSCRAMM, which can be expressed in S. aureus, have been identified [10]. Major protein adhesins in this group include biofilm-associated protein (Bap), clumping factors A and B (ClfA, ClfB), fibronectin binding proteins A and B (FnBPA, FnBPB), collagen binding protein (Cna), bone sialoprotein binding protein (Bbp), iron regulated surface determinants A and B (IsdA, IsdB), serine aspartate repeat gene proteins D and E (SdrD, SdrE), and Protein A (Spa) [1114]. Following adherence, the biofilm is further strengthened by an intracellular adhesin encoded by the ica operons (icaA, icaB, icaC, and icaD genes) which produce the cell surface polysaccharide poly-N-acetyl β-1-6 glucosamine (PNAG) and another antigen 336, a derivative of cell wall teichoic acid [13, 15, 16]. A strong relationship between PNAG and biofilm formation, although not absolute, was previously reported [8, 17].

In addition to the possession of MSCRAMM, S. aureus also produces a range of exotoxins that aid in host tissue membrane disruption providing nutrients essential for bacterial cell growth [18, 19] with some also contributing to biofilm formation. Exotoxins produced include cytotoxins, Panton Valentine Leucocidin (PVL), and hemolysins (α, β, and γ), which possess the ability to form pores in host cells enabling lysis [20, 21]. Additional toxins encoded for and/or produced include toxic shock syndrome toxin (TSST-1) and the staphylococcal enterotoxins or SE (SEA-SEE, SEG-SEJ), some of which are best characterized as superantigens in reference to their ability to activate the proliferation of T-cells leading to release of increasing levels of proinflammatory cytokines [22, 23]. These also include the rare and virulent exfoliative toxins ETA and ETB [24].

The increasing trend towards development of persistent antibiotic resistance improves the ability of this pathogen to resist treatment with antibiotics [5, 25] a fundamental feature in the development of chronic infections. Aim of this study was to determine the diversity of distribution of the major MSCRAMM and toxins among the West Australian S. aureus isolates of human origin, using serological and/or genotypic analysis and determine their genetic relatedness.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Strains

A total of 19 human S. aureus strains donated by different clinical pathology laboratories to the School of Biomedical Sciences in West Australia were kindly donated by Mr. Alain Delhaize, Senior Technical Manager, responsible for managing this collection. The remaining 12 S. aureus isolates were collected from the laboratory medicine students enrolled in medical microbiology (Human Ethics approval number SoBS 04/11) and 5 accredited capsular (CP) positive or negative control strains were kindly provided by Professor Gerald Pier, Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women’s Hospital. The 5 accredited CP positive or negative control strains used in this investigation included Strain M (CP1), Smith Diffuse (CP2), Strain Newman (CP5), USA 400 (CP8), and LAC USA 300 (CP neg). The 6th control strain was ATCC® 29213, a strong biofilm former. All strains were subjected to preliminary microbiological testing to confirm S. aureus [26] and methicillin-sensitivity (MSSA) as described elsewhere [5]. All S. aureus strains were stored at −80°C on cryobeads (Blackaby Diagnostic Pty Ltd., WA) for future studies. Positive ATCC toxin typing controls used in this study were ATCC 13565 for β-hemolysin, ATCC 49775 for PVL and γ-hemolysin, ATCC 51651 for TSST-1, and ATCC 8096 for α-hemolysin.

2.2. Bacterial Strain Growth

Pure colonies of S. aureus strains were inoculated in sterile nutrient broth dispensed in McCartney vials and incubated at 37°C for 24 hrs in a shaker incubator.

2.3. DNA Extraction

All strains were subjected to DNA extraction using the Mo-Bio DNA Extraction Kit (MO BIO Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA). All extracts were stored at −20°C until used.

2.4. Detection of Genes Encoding PVL and mecA

Utilization of the GenoType® MRSA assay (Hain Lifesciences) was used for detection of PVL and the presence of methicillin resistance. Briefly, DNA was isolated from cultured media and amplified with biotinylated primers. The amplified product was bound using a DNA strip technology that permitted visual identification of the presence of mecA and PVL genes in S. aureus.

2.5. Detection of S. aureus Enterotoxins

A SET-RPLA Toxin Detection Kit purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Australia was used to serologically type SEA, SEB, SEC, and SED. Briefly, latex sensitized with a combination of antienterotoxin A–D types serially diluted and added to the bacterial suspension. After 24 hrs incubation at room temperature, each well was observed for agglutination, which indicated the presence of enterotoxins.

2.6. Genotyping of S. aureus Strains

Determination of the presence of enterotoxins, mentioned in Section 2.5, was further confirmed by genotyping. Because the scope of detection of the exotoxins produced by the S. aureus isolates was limited because of the lack of availability of serological kits, the presence of a number of other toxins, described below, was carried out by genotyping.

The primers used in this investigation with their respective melting temperature (), band size, and references are shown in Table 1. Briefly, the conditions used for detection of different virulence factors were as follows.

Table 1: Primers used for detection of exotoxins and MSCRAMM using conventional PCR.

Amplification of TSST-1, clfA, clfB, can, and spa was performed at 95°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, for 30 sec, and 72°C for 45 sec with a final extension of 72°C for 10 min.

Amplification of fnBpA, fnBpB, hlb, sdrE, bbp, isdA, and sdrD and sdrE genes was performed at 95°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, for 30 sec, and 72°C for 45 sec with a final extension of 72°C for 10 min. Primers for isdB were developed in this study and amplified with the following conditions at 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, for 1 min, and 72°C for 2 min with a final extension of 72°C for 10 min.

Amplification of hla genes was performed at 95°C for 5 min, 38 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, for 30 sec, and 72°C for 45 sec with a final extension of 72°C for 10 min. While amplification of sea, seb, sec, sed, see, seg, seh, sei, and sej was performed at 95°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of 95°C for 2 min, for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min with a final extension of 72°C for 5 min, amplification of eta and etb was performed at 95°C for 5 min, 30 cycles of 95°C for 1 min, 58°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min with a final extension of 72°C for 10 min. Amplification of hlb was performed at 95°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 95°C for 45 sec, for 45 sec, and 72°C for 1 min with a final extension at 72°C for 10 min.

All PCR products were subjected to electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel and stained with 0.8 μL/100 mL of Midori Green DNA Stain (Nippon Genetics) in a 1x Sodium Borate Buffer (1x SB Buffer). O’RangeRuler DNA Ladder, 100–1500 bp (Fermentas), was used to observe approximate band sizes on the gel which was visualised on UV transilluminator.

2.7. RAPD Analysis

Three sequence primers previously published were used for RAPD-PCR test to provide more information on clinical, student, and control strains used in this study [36]. Primers C (5′-AGGGAACGAG-3′), OPA9 (5′-GGGTAACGCC-3′), and OPA13 (5′-CAGCACCCAC-3′) were used for amplification using 1 cycle of 94°C for 60 sec, 35 cycles of 94°C for 35 sec, 33°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 65 sec, followed by 1 cycle of 72°C for 7 min [36].

All PCR products were run on a 1% agarose gel in 1x SB Buffer. Gel was stained with Midori Green and viewed under UV transilluminator. Bacterial DNA was randomly selected to run in duplicate to ensure reproducibility of amplification. Bands were scored in binary code with a factor of 1 representing presence of band and a factor of 0 representing absence of bands. Results of the 3 primer sets were banded to produce a dendrogram using UPMA (DenoUPMA, http://genomes.urv.cat/UPGMA/index.php) and using the Jaccard coefficient to determine the relatedness and level of similarity between the isolates used in this study.

3. Results and Discussion

Several MSCRAMM were detected by genotyping in a high percentage of S. aureus isolates. These included genes encoding the proteins ClfA, ClfB, Spa, SdrD, SdrE, IsdA, and IsdB (Table 2). On the other hand, genes encoding the Bbp, FnBpB, and Cna proteins were detectable in less than 50% of the isolates, gene encoding FnBpA protein being detectable in the smallest percentage of the isolates.

Table 2: Distribution of MSCRAMM detected by genotyping.

The average number of MSCRAMM detected in this study was approximately 7, with 27 strains having a range of >6–10 (data not shown). In only 4/31 strains, 5 MSCRAMM or less were detected. Compiled results for MSCRAMM typing are shown in Table 2.

Among the toxins, the most prevalent toxin detected by genotyping among the S. aureus isolates was α-toxin, 2nd and 3rd most prevalent detected toxins being the enterotoxin G and β-toxin (Table 3). The genes encoding other toxins were prevalent in less than 30% of the isolates, with the lowest ones being the exfoliative toxins A and B. No strain was positive for genes encoding PVL toxin.

Table 3: Distribution of different toxins detected by genotyping and/or serotyping.

Twenty-three strains possessed genes encoding 2–4 different types of toxins. Only 3 strains possessed the gene for one toxin and 5 strains expressed genes for >5 toxins. The average number of toxins produced by the S. aureus strains in this study was 3 toxins (data not shown).

The SET-RPLA Toxin Detection Kits were able to detect fewer toxins as compared to SE genotyping (Table 4). Of the 8 SEA positive S. aureus strains, only 3 were detected in serotyping and, of 6 SEB positive strains, only 1 was detected in serotyping (Table 4). Of the 3 SEC positive strains, only 2 were detected by serotyping; however the genotyping and serotyping correlated with 0 positives by both methods (not significant at level but substantial at ).

Table 4: Correlation of serotyping versus genotyping methods for the major superantigenic enterotoxins.

PCR typing was more sensitive than immunoassays in detecting the genes associated with toxin production.

Accredited test capsular control strains were not positive for genes encoding SED, SEE, PVL, ETA, or ETB. All test control strains were positive for α and β and the TSST toxins and Spa, ClfA, ClfB, SdrE, and SdrD MSCRAMM (Table 5).

Table 5: Typing of control S. aureus strains.

Smith Diffuse S. aureus (CP2) expressed 9 MSCRAMM and 9 toxins, the highest of the control strains. Strain M (CP1) expressed 9 MSCRAMM and 8 toxins, USA 400 MW2 (CP8) expressed 9 MSCRAMM and 7 toxins, LAC USA 300 (CP neg) expressed 9 MSCRAMM and 6 toxins, ATCC 29213 expressed 8 MSCRAMM and 7 toxins, and Strain Newman (CP5) expressed 8 MSCRAMM and 6 toxins.

Amplification with primers OPA09 and OPA13 yielded 4 RAPD patterns from 3 distinct bands each whereas amplification with primer C yielded 6 RAPD patterns from 4 distinct bands. Presence or absence of bands resulted in binary data that was analyzed to produce a dendrogram. Using RAPD analysis, 5 cluster groups displaying the distribution of MSCRAMM and toxins between the groups were discernible (Figure 1).

Figure 1: RAPD-based dendrogram indicating the genetic relatedness among S. aureus isolates including the control isolates.

The cluster cut-off point was determined at 33% level of similarity (0.333) resulting in 5 major cluster groups (Table 6), namely, Cluster of Ia and Ib (level of similarity 0.667 to 0.800), Cluster of IIa and IIb (level of similarity 0.333 to 0.750), Cluster of IIIa and IIIb (level of similarity 0.333 to 1.000), Cluster of IVa and IVb (level of similarity 0.500–0.600), and Cluster of V (level of similarity 1.000), which were used to compare the cluster groups (Table 6).

Table 6: Distribution of the known MSCRAMM and toxins produced by the strains used in this study.

It can be seen that the majority of S. aureus isolates were clustered into group IIIa, with 58% (18/31) of the isolates displaying clonal similarity of MSCRAMM and toxins. The majority of clinical strains (16/19) were clustered in group IIIa suggesting a common source of infection of patients in hospitals (Table 7). Student strains, on the other hand, were dispersed into several cluster groups (Ia, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb, Iva, and IVb) indicating multiple potential sources for acquisition of infection. The control strains were clustered in groups Ia, IVa, and IVb.

Table 7: Cluster groups of clinical versus student versus control strains.

Greater diversity of cluster groups associated with the student MSSA isolates also indicated greater diversity of their clonal origins.

MRSA strains are known to be highly clonal [37]. However, unlike the diversity reported recently with MSSA isolates in Europe, genetic diversity of virulence factors associated with clonal complexes of West Australian MSSA isolates has not yet been reported. Vandendriessche et al. [38] demonstrated high genetic diversity of MSSA carriage isolates from animals and humans on pig, veal, dairy, beef, and broiler farms using spa typing and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). These studies supported a previous report [39] on the heterogeneity and genetic diversity of MSSA isolated from clinical specimens in a teaching hospital in Germany using spa typing, MLST, and enterotoxin genotyping. In contrast, the genetic diversity of the MSSA isolates determined in this investigation was determined based on the prevalence of both MSCRAMM and enterotoxin genotyping.

A large array of virulence factors [12, 15, 19] is involved in the pathogenesis of infections caused by S. aureus. Whether the information gained in this study on the relative prevalence of the genes encoding different virulence antigens and confinement of the majority of WA clinical isolates to a single cluster group (IIIa) offers an opportunity for formulation of potential strategies for the development of an effective vaccine capable of combatting infections caused by this pathogen in Western Australia remains to be determined.

Strategies used for the development of vaccines against infections caused by S. aureus targeting a limited number of single antigens is unlikely to be effective for global vaccine usage because of differences in the distribution of genes encoding different virulence factors participating in the establishment of infection. Of interest is a relatively recent study in which patients afflicted with S. aureus bacteremia were reported to display different antibody responses to 19 different MSCRAMM of each bacterial strain that was isolated from these patients [25]. Ideally, an effective S. aureus vaccine must generate protective immunity that can neutralize the major exotoxins and interfere with adhesion facilitated by the major MSCRAMM participating in attachment/colonization of this pathogen to the niche host tissue. Many different types of vaccines including MSCRAMM-based vaccines [40], capsular polysaccharide, and/or PNAG-based conjugate vaccines [3, 15, 40] involving conjugation of one to 3 MSCRAMM [27, 40] or selected inactivated toxins including α-toxin encoded by the hla gene [3, 28, 4043] have been evaluated using passive and/or active immunization of mice. However, none of these vaccines were considered to be providing satisfactory protection raising doubts on the possibility of ever developing an effective vaccine against S. aureus infections for use in humans [44], particularly after the report of antigenic competition subsequent to coadministration of CP-based and PNAG-based conjugate vaccines [45]. Fortunately, not all the potential options for the development of an effective vaccine against infections caused by S. aureus have been exhausted if one was to take the relative distribution/prevalence and cluster grouping of virulence antigens among the clinical isolates into account for the development of a universal vaccine against infections caused by S. aureus.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Alain Delhaize, School of Biomedical Sciences, for donation of the S. aureus strains from different hospitals and CHIRI Biosciences Precinct, Curtin University, for the provision of core infrastructure. The first author would also like to thank Curtin University for providing APA (Australian Postgraduate Award) and CRS (Curtin Research Scholarship) in support of the pursuit of her Ph.D.. Final thanks are due to Mrs. Abtar Kaur, an English language editor, for provision of editing services.

References

  1. K. Smith, K. A. Gould, G. Ramage, C. G. Gemmell, J. Hinds, and S. Lang, “Influence of tigecycline on expression of virulence factors in biofilm-associated cells of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 380–387, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. K. V. Javid and H. Foster, “Dye labelled monoclonal antibody assay for detection of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 from Staphylococcus aureus,” Iranian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 170–176, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  3. T. Maira-Litrán, A. Kropec, D. A. Goldmann, and G. B. Pier, “Comparative opsonic and protective activities of Staphylococcus aureus conjugate vaccines containing native or deacetylated staphylococcal poly-N-acetyl-β-(1-6)-glucosamine,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 6752–6762, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Y. Le Loir, F. Baron, and M. Gautier, “Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning,” Genetics and Molecular Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 63–76, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Babra, J. Tiwari, P. Costantino et al., “Human methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: potential associations with antibiotic resistance persistence and surface polysaccharide antigens,” Journal of Basic Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 721–728, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. T. J. Foster, J. A. Geoghegan, V. K. Ganesh, and M. Höök, “Adhesion, invasion and evasion: the many functions of the surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus,” Nature Reviews Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. Bukowski, B. Wladyka, and G. Dubin, “Exfoliative toxins of Staphylococcus aureus,” Toxins, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1148–1165, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Babra, J. G. Tiwari, G. Pier et al., “The persistence of biofilm-associated antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from clinical bovine mastitis cases in Australia,” Folia Microbiologica, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 469–474, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. K. Archer, M. J. Mazaitis, J. William Costerton, J. G. Leid, M. E. Powers, and M. E. Shirtliff, “Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation and roles in human disease,” Virulence, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 445–459, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. J. Walsh, H. Miajlovic, O. V. Gorkun, and T. J. Foster, “Identification of the Staphylococcus aureus MSCRAMM clumping factor B (ClfB) binding site in the alphaC-domain of human fibrinogen,” Microbiology, vol. 154, part 2, pp. 550–558, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Plata, A. E. Rosato, and G. Wegrzyn, “Staphylococcus aureus as an infectious agent: overview of biochemistry and molecular genetics of its pathogenicity,” Acta Biochimica Polonica, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 597–612, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. J. Gordon and F. D. Lowy, “Pathogenesis of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 46, supplement 5, pp. S350–S359, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. C. Cucarella, C. Solano, J. Valle, B. Amorena, Í. Lasa, and J. R. Penadés, “Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 183, no. 9, pp. 2888–2896, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. G. Rasmussen, S. Monecke, R. Ehricht, and B. Söderquist, “Prevalence of clonal complexes and virulence genes among commensal and invasive Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Sweden,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 10, Article ID e77477, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. R. Middleton, “Staphylococcus aureus antigens and challenges in vaccine development,” Expert Review of Vaccines, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 805–815, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. I. Verdier, G. Durand, M. Bes et al., “Identification of the capsular polysaccharides in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates by PCR and agglutination tests,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 725–729, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. Szczuka, K. Urbańska, M. Pietryka, and A. Kaznowski, “Biofilm density and detection of biofilm-producing genes in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains,” Folia Microbiologica, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. N. K. Sharma, C. E. D. Rees, and C. E. R. Dodd, “Development of a single-reaction multiplex PCR toxin typing assay for Staphylococcus aureus strains,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 1347–1353, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Bien, O. Sokolova, and P. Bozko, “Characterization of virulence factors of Staphylococcus aureus: novel function of known virulence factors that are implicated in activation of airway epithelial proinflammatory response,” Journal of Pathogens, vol. 2011, Article ID 601905, 13 pages, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. M. J. Anderson, Y.-C. Lin, A. N. Gillman, P. J. Parks, P. M. Schlievert, and M. L. Peterson, “Alpha-toxin promotes Staphylococcus aureus mucosal biofilm formation,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 2, article 64, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. Alonzo III and V. J. Torres, “Bacterial survival amidst an immune onslaught: the contribution of the Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxins,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e1003143, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. G. Ulrich, “Evolving superantigens of Staphylococcus aureus,” FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. N. Balaban and A. Rasooly, “Staphylococcal enterotoxins,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Ladhani, C. L. Joannou, D. P. Lochrie, R. W. Evans, and S. M. Poston, “Clinical, microbial, and biochemical aspects of the exfoliative toxins causing staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 224–242, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. N. J. Verkaik, H. A. Boelens, C. P. de Vogel et al., “Heterogeneity of the humoral immune response following Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 509–518, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. S. T. Cowan, K. J. Steel, G. I. Barrow, and R. K. A. Feltham, Cowan and Steel's Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 3rd edition, 1993.
  27. K. Stutz, R. Stephan, and T. Tasara, “SpA, ClfA, and FnbA genetic variations lead to Staphaurex test-negative phenotypes in bovine mastitis Staphylococcus aureus isolates,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 638–646, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. I. Montesinos, E. Salido, T. Delgado, M. Cuervo, and A. Sierra, “Epidemiologic genotyping of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis at a university hospital and comparison with antibiotyping and protein A and coagulase gene polymorphisms,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 2119–2125, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. C. Booth, L. M. Pence, P. Mahasreshti, M. C. Callegan, and M. S. Gilmore, “Clonal associations among Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various sites of infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 345–352, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. Tristan, L. Ying, M. Bes, J. Etienne, F. Vandenesch, and G. Lina, “Use of multiplex PCR to identify Staphylococcus aureus adhesins involved in human hematogenous infections,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 4465–4467, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. A. Sabat, D. C. Melles, G. Martirosian, H. Grundmann, A. Van Belkum, and W. Hryniewicz, “Distribution of the serine-aspartate repeat protein-encoding sdr genes among nasal-carriage and invasive Staphylococcus aureus strains,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1135–1138, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. H. A. Nada, N. I. M. Gomaa, A. Elakhras, R. Wasfy, and R. A. Baker, “Skin colonization by superantigen-producing Staphylococcus aureus in Egyptian patients with atopic dermatitis and its relation to disease severity and serum interleukin-4 level,” International Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. e29–e33, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. P. Sauer, J. Sila, T. Štosová et al., “Prevalence of genes encoding extracellular virulence factors among meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 403–410, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. U. S. Ramakrishna, J. J. Kingston, M. Harishchandra Sripathi, and H. V. Batra, “Taguchi optimization of duplex PCR for simultaneous identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Clostridium perfringens alpha toxins,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 93–100, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. V. L. M. Rall, F. P. Vieira, R. Rall et al., “PCR detection of staphylococcal enterotoxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from raw and pasteurized milk,” Veterinary Microbiology, vol. 132, no. 3-4, pp. 408–413, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. R. G. Naffa, S. M. Bdour, H. M. Migdadi, and A. A. Shehabi, “Enterotoxicity and genetic variation among clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Jordan,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 183–187, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. G. W. Coombs, G. R. Nimmo, J. M. Bell et al., “Genetic diversity among community methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains causing outpatient infections in Australia,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 4735–4743, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Vandendriessche, W. Vanderhaeghen, J. Larsen et al., “High genetic diversity of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) from humans and animals on livestock farms and presence of SCCmec remnant DNA in MSSA CC398,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 69, no. 2, Article ID dkt366, pp. 355–362, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. F. Layer, B. Ghebremedhin, W. König, and B. König, “Heterogeneity of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains at a German University Hospital implicates the circulating-strain pool as a potential source of emerging methicillin-resistant S. aureus clones,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 2179–2185, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. Y. K. Stranger-Jones, T. Bae, and O. Schneewind, “Vaccine assembly from surface proteins of Staphylococcus aureus,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 45, pp. 16942–16947, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. Bubeck Wardenburg and O. Schneewind, “Vaccine protection against Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 205, no. 2, pp. 287–294, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. M. Dinges, P. M. Orwin, and P. M. Schlievert, “Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 16–34, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. I. V. Pinchuk, E. J. Beswick, and V. E. Reyes, “Staphylococcal enterotoxins,” Toxins, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 2177–2197, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. G. B. Pier, “Will there ever be a universal Staphylococcus aureus vaccine?” Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 1865–1876, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. Pozzi, K. Wilk, J. C. Lee, M. Gening, N. Nifantiev, and G. B. Pier, “Opsonic and protective properties of antibodies raised to conjugate vaccines targeting six Staphylococcus aureus antigens,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e46648, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus