Backside Wear Analysis of Retrieved Acetabular Liners with a Press-Fit Locking Mechanism in Comparison to Wear Simulation In Vitro

<div>(a) SEM image with embedded particles in Section  5 from P-Cup<svg height="11.7978pt" id="M16" style="vertical-align:-3.27282pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.52498 42.578 11.7978" width="42.578pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M43 650V622C120 616 128 612 128 526V124C128 39 120 33 34 27V0H270C392 0 492 25 567 83C643 141 690 230 690 350C690 444 655 517 605 565C543 625 450 650 323 650H43ZM213 547C213 587 217 598 226 604C236 612 262 617 304 617C371 617 429 604 474 576C554 529 592 439 592 336C592 176 505 36 319 36C246 36 213 55 213 131V547Z" id="g190-69"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="735" vert-adv-y="735"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.591,3.132)"><path d="M46 650V622C120 617 128 613 128 525V125C128 42 120 34 40 28V0H311V28C221 34 212 39 212 124V281L286 262C297 261 316 261 331 263C429 275 526 338 526 468C526 533 501 579 462 609C422 638 364 650 293 650H46ZM212 559C212 588 215 600 223 606C230 613 251 618 279 618C361 618 430 572 430 464C430 337 350 302 285 302C252 302 225 309 212 314V559Z" id="g190-81"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="563" vert-adv-y="563"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,14.714,3.132)"><path d="M956 650H736V622C814 613 818 602 804 542C789 471 733 275 691 141H689C628 314 570 476 514 641H485C434 478 377 312 323 142H321C277 284 238 419 199 554C184 605 186 613 259 622V650H16V622C77 615 92 606 117 524C172 346 228 170 281 -11H312C363 151 419 312 475 488H477C528 343 597 150 652 -11H683C765 269 826 458 848 522C878 605 887 613 956 622V650Z" id="g190-88"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="971" vert-adv-y="971"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,25.624,3.132)"><path d="M687 650H462V622C543 612 549 605 530 547C498 447 422 252 372 126H370C302 298 229 492 204 563C188 607 191 615 262 622V650H17V622C77 616 93 608 122 534C180 389 262 172 329 -11H360C436 196 541 450 568 516C606 605 619 614 687 622V650Z" id="g190-87"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="703" vert-adv-y="703"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,31.592,3.132)"><path d="M135 536C164 536 186 560 186 587C186 617 164 639 136 639C109 639 85 617 85 587C85 560 109 536 135 536ZM252 0V26C188 32 181 38 181 106V451C138 433 90 420 39 412V388C99 379 102 374 102 312V106C102 38 95 32 32 26V0H252Z" id="g190-106"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="268" vert-adv-y="268"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,33.921,3.132)"><path d="M298 36L289 62C276 55 253 45 228 45C202 45 169 60 169 141V397H276C289 405 292 426 282 437H169V574L155 576L90 509V437H45L17 408L21 397H90V107C90 28 125 -12 188 -12C198 -12 213 -8 230 1L298 36Z" id="g190-117"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="305" vert-adv-y="305"></glyph.data></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,36.696,3.132)"><path d="M517 162C503 123 484 88 467 68C445 42 417 34 341 34C291 34 256 34 237 47C219 59 213 81 213 128V317H308C395 317 402 311 415 240H444V431H415C403 364 398 356 307 356H213V584C213 613 215 616 246 616H322C394 616 421 609 435 587C448 566 458 544 467 502L496 506C493 557 488 625 488 650H42V622C120 616 128 612 128 523V125C128 43 120 35 29 28V0H511C520 31 540 125 546 158L517 162Z" id="g190-70"></path><glyph.data ascent="989" descent="-360" horiz-adv-x="568" vert-adv-y="568"></glyph.data></g></svg> retrieval; (b) EDX analysis of the selected particle, which apparently consists of titanium alloy. The carbon spectrum corresponds to the surrounding polymer of the liner.</div>

BioMed Research International

fig4

Figure 4

Figure 4: Backside Wear Analysis of Retrieved Acetabular Liners with a Press-Fit Locking Mechanism in Comparison to Wear Simulation In Vitro 