Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Corrigendum

A corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the corrigendum, please click here.

BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 9065495, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9065495
Research Article

A New Neurocognitive Interpretation of Shoulder Position Sense during Reaching: Unexpected Competence in the Measurement of Extracorporeal Space

1Complex Unit of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sapienza University of Rome, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
2Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
3Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Sapienza University of Rome, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
4Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Sapienza University of Rome, Azienda Policlinico Umberto I, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy
5Department of Geriatrics, Neurosciences and Orthopedics, Division of Neurophysiopathology, Teaching Hospital “Agostino Gemelli”, Rome, Italy

Received 12 July 2016; Revised 7 November 2016; Accepted 28 November 2016

Academic Editor: Pasquale De Bonis

Copyright © 2016 Teresa Paolucci et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. K. Anochin, “Basic principles of formation of defense mechanisms in the body,” Lékařská Věda V Zahraničí, vol. 10, pp. 187–193, 1963. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. F. W. Mast, A. Berthoz, and S. M. Kosslyn, “Mental imagery of visual motion modifies the perception of roll-vection stimulation,” Perception, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 945–957, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. G. Rouse and M. H. Schieber, “Spatiotemporal distribution of location and object effects in reach-tograsp kinematics,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 114, no. 6, pp. 3268–3282, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. Gonzalez and E. Niechwiej-Szwedo, “Sequential movements: when does binocular vision facilitate object grasping and placing,” Journal of Vision, vol. 15, no. 12, article no. 1145, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. R. Morris and I. Q. Whishaw, “Arm and hand movement: current knowledge and future perspective,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 6, article 19, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. Jacquier-Bret, N. Rezzoug, and P. Gorce, “Adaptation of joint flexibility during a reach-to-grasp movement,” Motor Control, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 342–361, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. L. Lawrence, J. P. Braman, R. F. Laprade, and P. M. Ludewig, “Comparison of 3-dimensional shoulder complex kinematics in individuals with and without shoulder pain, part 1: sternoclavicular, acromioclavicular, and scapulothoracic joints,” Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 636–645, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. A. I. Prinold and A. M. J. Bull, “Scaling and kinematics optimisation of the scapula and thorax in upper limb musculoskeletal models,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2813–2819, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. C. M. Larsen, K. Søgaard, S. S. Chreiteh, A. Holtermann, and B. Juul-Kristensen, “Neuromuscular control of scapula muscles during a voluntary task in subjects with Subacromial Impingement Syndrome. A Case-control Study,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1158–1165, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. A. I. Prinold and A. M. J. Bull, “Scapula kinematics of pull-up techniques: avoiding impingement risk with training changes,” Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 629–635, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. O. Coats, A. J. Fath, S. L. Astill, and J. P. Wann, “Eye and hand movement strategies in older adults during a complex reaching task,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 234, no. 2, pp. 533–547, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. M. B. Bennett and U. Castiello, “Reach to grasp: changes with age,” Journal of Gerontology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. P1–P7, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. F. Bernardi, B. F. Marino, A. Maravita, G. Castelnuovo, R. Tebano, and E. Bricolo, “Grasping in wonderland: altering the visual size of the body recalibrates the body schema,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 226, no. 4, pp. 585–594, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. J. P. Warner, S. Lephart, and F. H. Fu, “Role of proprioception in pathoetiology of shoulder instability,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 330, pp. 35–39, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. M. Lephart, D. M. Pincivero, J. L. Giraldo, and F. H. Fu, “The role of proprioception in the management and rehabilitation of athletic injuries,” The American Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 130–137, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Masumoto and N. Inui, “Visual and proprioceptive adaptation of arm position in a virtual environment,” Journal of Motor Behavior, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 483–489, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Langan, “Older adults demonstrate greater accuracy in joint position matching using self-guided movements,” Human Movement Science, vol. 36, pp. 97–106, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. P. Lubiatowski, P. Ogrodowicz, M. Wojtaszek et al., “Measurement of active shoulder proprioception: dedicated system and device,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 177–183, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Elangovan, A. Herrmann, and J. Konczak, “Assessing proprioceptive function: evaluating joint position matching methods against psychophysical thresholds,” Physical Therapy, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 553–561, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. S. Neer II, “Impingement lesions,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 173, pp. 70–77, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. W. K. Chang, “Shoulder impingement syndrome,” Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 493–510, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. S. Neer 2nd, “Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder. 1972,” The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, vol. 87, no. 6, article 1399, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. A. Heller, J. A. Calcaterra, S. L. Green, and L. Brown, “Intersensory conflict between vision and touch: the response modality dominates when precise, attention-riveting judgments are required,” Perception & Psychophysics, vol. 61, no. 7, pp. 1384–1398, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. C. Huskisson, “Measurement of pain,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 768–769, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. E. Beaton, J. G. Wright, J. N. Katz et al., “Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery—Series A, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 1038–1046, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Padua, L. Padua, E. Ceccarelli et al., “Italian version of the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation,” Journal of Hand Surgery, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 179–186, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. H. Yian, A. J. Ramappa, O. Arneberg, and C. Gerber, “The constant score in normal shoulders,” Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 128–133, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. C. R. Constant and A. H. G. Murley, “A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 214, pp. 160–164, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. M. Bland and D. G. Altman, “Measuring agreement in method comparison studies,” Statistical Methods in Medical Research, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 135–160, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. C. Fyhr, L. Gustavsson, C. Wassinger, and G. Sole, “The effects of shoulder injury on kinaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Manual Therapy, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J.-L. Yang, S. Chen, M.-H. Jan, Y.-F. Lin, and J.-J. Lin, “Proprioception assessment in subjects with idiopathic loss of shoulder range of motion: joint position sense and a novel proprioceptive feedback index,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 1218–1224, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. M. Valeriani, D. Restuccia, V. Di Lazzaro, F. Franceschi, C. Fabbriciani, and P. Tonali, “Central nervous system modifications in patients with lesion of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee,” Brain, vol. 119, no. 5, pp. 1751–1762, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. C. D. Giachritsis, A. M. Wing, and P. G. Lovell, “The role of spatial integration in the perception of surface orientation with active touch,” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 1628–1640, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. I. Salles, B. Velasques, V. Cossich et al., “Strength training and shoulder proprioception,” Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 277–280, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Emery and J. N. Côté, “Repetitive arm motion-induced fatigue affects shoulder but not endpoint position sense,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 216, no. 4, pp. 553–564, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. N. Evans, S. Gale, A. Schurger, and O. Blanke, “Visual feedback dominates the sense of agency for brain-machine actions,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 6, Article ID e0130019, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. K. C. Dieter, B. Hu, D. C. Knill, R. Blake, and D. Tadin, “Kinesthesis can make an invisible hand visible,” Psychological Science, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 66–75, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. I. Sperandio, S. Kaderali, P. A. Chouinard, J. Frey, and M. A. Goodale, “Perceived size change induced by nonvisual signals in darkness: the relative contribution of vergence and proprioception,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 43, pp. 16915–16923, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. U. T. A. Wolfe, J. A. Comee, and B. S. Sherman, “Feeling darkness: a visually induced somatosensory illusion,” Perception & Psychophysics, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 879–886, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. R. F. de Oliveira, R. R. D. Oudejans, and P. J. Beek, “Experts appear to use angle of elevation information in basketball shooting,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 750–761, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. B. D. Cameron, C. de la Malla, and J. López-Moliner, “The role of differential delays in integrating transient visual and proprioceptive information,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 5, article no. 50, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. T. Judkins and R. A. Scheidt, “Visuo-proprioceptive interactions during adaptation of the human reach,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 868–887, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. S. Ladwig, C. Sutter, and J. Müsseler, “Intra- and intermodal integration of discrepant visual and proprioceptive action effects,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 231, no. 4, pp. 457–468, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. Tagliabue and J. McIntyre, “When kinesthesia becomes visual: a theoretical justification for executing motor tasks in visual space,” PLOS ONE, vol. 8, no. 7, Article ID e68438, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. Blanchard, R. Roll, J.-P. Roll, and A. Kavounoudias, “Differential contributions of vision, touch and muscle proprioception to the coding of hand movements,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4, Article ID e62475, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus