Review Article
Genetic Association of CHAT rs3810950 and rs2177369 Polymorphisms with the Risk of Alzheimer’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis
Table 5
Meta-analysis of the association between CHAT rs2177369 polymorphism and Alzheimer’s disease risk.
| Meta-analysis | Genetic comparison | (%) | Effect model | OR [95% CI] | | Statistical power |
| Overall | G versus A | 82 | Random | 0.85 [0.61, 1.18] | 0.34 | NA | GG versus AA | 77 | Random | 0.73 [0.40, 1.32] | 0.3 | NA | GA versus AA | 0 | Fixed | 0.80 [0.63, 1.01] | 0.06 | NA | GG + GA versus AA | 32 | Fixed | 0.77 [0.62, 0.96] | 0.02 | 69.05% | GG versus AA + GA | 82 | Random | 0.85 [0.49, 1.47] | 0.55 | 30.29% |
| Analysis without Cook (1) study | G versus A | 72 | Random | 0.96 [0.70, 1.31] | 0.78 | NA | GG versus AA | 62 | Random | 0.91 [0.52, 1.59] | 0.73 | NA | GA versus AA | 0 | Fixed | 0.83 [0.62, 1.10] | 0.19 | NA | GG + GA versus AA | 7 | Fixed | 0.87 [0.67, 1.14] | 0.32 | 19.62% | GG versus AA + GA | 69 | Random | 1.04 [0.63, 1.71] | 0.88 | 5.97% |
| Analysis without Scacchi study | G versus A | 22 | Fixed | 0.73 [0.61, 0.86] | <0.01 | NA | GG versus AA | 13 | Fixed | 0.54 [0.39, 0.76] | <0.01 | NA | GA versus AA | 0 | Fixed | 0.76 [0.58, 0.99] | 0.05 | NA | GG + GA versus AA | 0 | Fixed | 0.68 [0.53, 0.88] | <0.01 | 86.83% | GG versus AA + GA | 26 | Fixed | 0.65 [0.48, 0.87] | <0.01 | 73.79% |
|
|
Note: NA: not applicable.
|