Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2016, Article ID 9540298, 7 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9540298
Clinical Study

Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

Orthopedic Department, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

Received 9 July 2016; Accepted 5 September 2016

Academic Editor: William B. Rodgers

Copyright © 2016 Guoxin Fan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. Kalff, C. Ewald, A. Waschke, L. Gobisch, and C. Hopf, “Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis in older people: current treatment options,” Deutsches Arzteblatt International, vol. 110, no. 37, pp. 613–624, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. Çavuşoğlu, R. A. Kaya, O. N. Türkmenoglu, C. Tuncer, I. Çolak, and Y. AydIn, “Midterm outcome after unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: 5-Year prospective study,” European Spine Journal, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2133–2142, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. G. Macedo, A. Hum, L. Kuleba et al., “Physical therapy interventions for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review,” Physical Therapy, vol. 93, no. 12, pp. 1646–1660, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Chrastil and A. A. Patel, “Complications associated with posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 283–291, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. N. A. Gibson and G. Waddell, “Surgery for degenerative lumbar spondylosis: updated Cochrane Review,” Spine, vol. 30, no. 20, pp. 2312–2320, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. M. Müslüman, A. Yilmaz, T. Cansever et al., “Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterolateral fusion with instrumentation in the treatment of low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis: midterm clinical outcomes,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 488–496, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. J. Bevevino, D. G. Kang, R. A. Lehman Jr., G. S. Van Blarcum, S. C. Wagner, and D. E. Gwinn, “Systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion rates performed without posterolateral fusion,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1686–1690, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Fan, Q. Fu, G. Gu et al., “Radiation exposure to surgeon in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with novel spinal locators,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. E173–E180, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. L. T. Al-Khouja, E. M. Baron, J. Patrick Johnson, T. T. Kim, and D. Drazin, “Cost-effectiveness analysis in minimally invasive spine surgery,” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 36, article E4, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. D. Schwender, L. T. Holly, D. P. Rouben, and K. T. Foley, “Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 18, supplement, pp. S1–S6, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. H. Lee, W. M. Yue, W. Yeo, H. Soeharno, and S. B. Tan, “Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,” European Spine Journal, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 2265–2270, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. B. Sim, J. A. Murovic, B. Y. Cho, T. J. Lim, and J. Park, “Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments: laboratory investigation,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 700–708, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. J. Talia, M. L. Wong, H. C. Lau, and A. H. Kaye, “Comparison of the different surgical approaches for lumbar interbody fusion,” Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 243–251, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. H. Wu, J. F. Fraser, and R. Härtl, “Minimal access versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: meta-analysis of fusion rates,” Spine, vol. 35, no. 26, pp. 2273–2281, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. T. G. Lowe, A. D. Tahernia, M. F. O'Brien, and D. A. B. Smith, “Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results,” Journal of Spinal Disorders, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 31–38, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. H. Xu, W. Ju, N. Xu et al., “Biomechanical comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with 1 or 2 cages by finite-element analysis,” Neurosurgery, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. ons198–ons205, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. G. Crandall and J. Revella, “Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes,” Spine, vol. 34, no. 20, pp. 2126–2133, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. R. D. Muchow, W. K. Hsu, and P. A. Anderson, “Histopathologic inflammatory response induced by recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 causing radiculopathy after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,” Spine Journal, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. e1–e6, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. H. J. Meisel, M. Schnöring, C. Hohaus et al., “Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2,” European Spine Journal, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 1735–1744, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. J. A. Rihn, R. Patel, J. Makda et al., “Complications associated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,” Spine Journal, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 623–629, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. Vaidya, A. Sethi, S. Bartol, M. Jacobson, C. Coe, and J. G. Craig, “Complications in the use of rhBMP-2 in PEEK cages for interbody spinal fusions,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 557–562, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. V. A. Mehta, M. J. McGirt, G. L. Garcés Ambrossi et al., “Trans-foraminal versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical morbidity,” Neurological Research, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 38–42, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. Y. Aoki, M. Yamagata, F. Nakajima, Y. Ikeda, and K. Takahashi, “Posterior migration of fusion cages in degenerative lumbar disease treated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of three patients,” Spine, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. E54–E58, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Z. Chen, J. Zhao, A. Liu, J. Yuan, and Z. Li, “Surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,” International Orthopaedics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 197–201, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. D. Helgeson, R. A. Lehman Jr., J. C. Patzkowski, A. E. Dmitriev, M. K. Rosner, and A. W. MacK, “Adjacent vertebral body osteolysis with bone morphogenetic protein use in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,” Spine Journal, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 507–510, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus