Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 1019529, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1019529
Research Article

Exposure to Workplace Bullying: The Role of Coping Strategies in Dealing with Work Stressors

1Research Group Occupational & Organisational Psychology and Professional Learning, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2Research Centre for Work and Organisation Studies, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
3Knowledge, Information and Research Centre, IDEWE (External Service for Prevention and Protection at Work), Leuven, Belgium
4Optentia Research Focus Area, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
5Environment and Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Correspondence should be addressed to Whitney Van den Brande

Received 15 May 2017; Revised 4 August 2017; Accepted 17 October 2017; Published 15 November 2017

Academic Editor: Silvia Pignata

Copyright © 2017 Whitney Van den Brande et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, and C. L. Cooper, “The concept of Bullying and Harassment at Work: The European Tradition,” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice, S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, and C. L. Cooper, Eds., Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  2. M. B. Nielsen, S. B. Matthiesen, and S. Einarsen, “The impact of methodological moderators on prevalence rates of workplace bullying. A meta-analysis,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 955–979, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. Zapf, J. Escartin, S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, and M. Vartia, “Empirical Findings on Prevalence and Risk Groups of Bullying in the Workplace, in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace,” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research and Practice, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  4. G. Giorgi, S. Mancuso, F. Fiz Perez et al., “Bullying among nurses and its relationship with burnout and organizational climate,” International Journal of Nursing Practice, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 160–168, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. B. Nielsen and S. Einarsen, “Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: a meta-analytic review,” Work & Stress, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 309–332, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Kivimäki, M. Virtanen, M. Vartia, M. Elovainio, J. Vahtera, and L. Keltikangas-Järvinen, “Workplace bullying and the risk of cardiovascular disease and depression,” Occupational and Environmental Medicine, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 779–783, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. J. Hauge, A. Skogstad, and S. Einarsen, “Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: results of a large representative study,” Work and Stress, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 220–242, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. D. Zapf and S. Einarsen, “Individual Antecedents of Bullying: Victims and Perpetrators,” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice, S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, and C. L. Cooper, Eds., Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  9. A.-K. Samnani and P. Singh, “Workplace Bullying: Considering the Interaction Between Individual and Work Environment,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 139, no. 3, pp. 537–549, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. S. Lazarus and S. Folkman, Stress, Appraisal, and Coping, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
  11. W. Van den Brande, E. Baillien, H. De Witte, T. Vander Elst, and L. Godderis, “The role of work stressors, coping strategies and coping resources in the process of workplace bullying: A systematic review and development of a comprehensive model,” Aggression and Violent Behavior, vol. 29, pp. 61–71, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. E. Baillien, N. De Cuyper, and H. De Witte, “Job autonomy and workload as antecedents of workplace bullying: A two-wave test of Karasek's Job Demand Control Model for targets and perpetrators,” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 191–208, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. de Cuyper, E. Baillien, and H. de Witte, “Job insecurity, perceived employability and targets ‘and perpetrators’ experiences of workplace bullying,” Work and Stress, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 206–224, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. I. Reknes, S. Einarsen, S. Knardahl, and B. Lau, “The prospective relationship between role stressors and new cases of self-reported workplace bullying,” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 45–52, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. H. Leymann, “The content and development of mobbing at work,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 165–184, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. R. Agnew, “Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency,” Criminology, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 47–88, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Hinduja, “Work place violence and negative affective responses: a test of Agnew's general strain theory,” Journal of Criminal Justice, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 657–666, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Hoel and D. Salin, “Organisational Antecedents of Workplace Bullying,” in Bullying and Emotional Abuse in the Workplace, S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf and, and C. Cooper, Eds., pp. 203–218, Taylor & Francis, London, UK, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  19. S. Folkman, R. S. Lazarus, C. Dunkel-Schetter, A. DeLongis, and R. J. Gruen, “Dynamics of a stressful encounter. cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 992–1003, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. K. M. Gil, J. J. Wilson, and J. L. Edens, “The stability of pain coping strategies in young children, adolescents, and adults with sickle cell disease over an 18-month period,” The Clinical Journal of Pain, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 110–115, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. V. Powers, D. Gallagher-Thompson, and H. C. Kraemer, “Coping and depression in Alzheimer's caregivers: Longitudinal evidence of stability,” Journals of Gerontology - Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. P205–P211, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. C. S. Carver, M. F. Scheier, and K. J. Weintraub, “Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 267–283, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. E. Baillien, I. Neyens, H. De Witte, and N. De Cuyper, “A qualitative study on the development of workplace bullying: Towards a three way model,” Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. L. Day and H. A. Livingstone, “Chronic and acute stressors among military personnel: do coping styles buffer their negative impact on health?” Journal of occupational health psychology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 348–360, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. E. Hahn, “The effects of locus of control on daily exposure, coping and reactivity to work interpersonal stressors: A diary study,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 729–748, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Adriaenssens, V. De Gucht, and S. Maes, “Determinants and prevalence of burnout in emergency nurses: A systematic review of 25 years of research,” International Journal of Nursing Studies, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 649–661, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. H. Neuman and R. A. Baron, “Social Antecedents of Bullying: A Social Interactionist Perspective,” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice, S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, and C. L. Cooper, Eds., Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  28. R. B. Felson and J. T. Tedeschi, “A social interactionist approach to violence: Cross-cultural applications,” Violence and Victims, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 295–310, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. S. Folkman, R. S. Lazarus, R. J. Gruen, and A. DeLongis, “Appraisal, coping, health status, and psychological symptoms,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 571–579, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Folkman, “Personal control and stress and coping processes: a theoretical analysis,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 839–852, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Vander Elst, C. Cavents, K. Daneels et al., “Job demands–resources predicting burnout and work engagement among Belgian home health care nurses: a cross-sectional study,” Nursing Outlook, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 542–556, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. G. Notelaers and S. Einarsen, “The construction and validity of the Short-Negative Acts Questionnaire,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Workplace Bullying, 2008.
  33. M. Van Veldhoven and T. F. Meijman, Vragenlijst Beleving en Beoordeling van de Arbeid [Questionnaire experience and evaluation of work], NIA, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1994.
  34. G. Notelaers, H. De Witte, M. Van Veldhoven, and J. K. Vermunt, “Construction and validation of the Short Inventory to Monitor Psychosocial Hazards,” Médecine du Traivail et Ergonomie, vol. 44, pp. 11–77, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  35. I. Hansez, “The "Working conditions and control questionnaire" (WOCCQ): Towards a structural model of subjective stress,” Revue europeenne de psychologie appliquee, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 253–262, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. T. Vander Elst, H. de Witte, and N. de Cuyper, “The job insecurity scale: a psychometric evaluation across five European countries,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 364–380, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. Weston and P. A. Gore, “A brief guide to structural equation modeling,” The Counseling Psychologist, vol. 34, pp. 719–751, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. B. M. Byrne, “Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, second edition,” Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Second Edition, pp. 1–396, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. L. Hu and P. M. Bentler, “Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives,” Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–55, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. B. Bakker, M. van Veldhoven, and D. Xanthopoulou, “Beyond the demand-control model: thriving on high job demands and resources,” Journal of Personnel Psychology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–16, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. J. E. Mathieu, S. I. Tannenbaum, and E. Salas, “Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 828–847, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. J. M. Cortina, G. Chen, and W. P. Dunlap, “Testing Interaction Effects in LISREL: Examination and Illustration of Available Procedures,” Organizational Research Methods, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 324–360, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. L. S. Aiken and S. G. West, Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage, 1991.
  44. A. B. Bakker, J. J. Hakanen, E. Demerouti, and D. Xanthopoulou, “Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high,” Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 274–284, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. C. E. Lance, M. M. Butts, and L. C. Michels, “The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: what did they really say?” Organizational Research Methods, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 202–220, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. J. E. Lewin and J. K. Sager, “An investigation of the influence of coping resources in salespersons' emotional exhaustion,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 798–805, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. C.-F. Chen and Y.-L. Kao, “The connection between the hassles-burnout relationship, as moderated by coping, and aberrant behaviors and health problems among bus drivers,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, vol. 53, pp. 105–111, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. A. LePine, N. P. Podsakoff, and M. A. LePine, “A meta-analytic test of the challenge Stressor-hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among Stressors and performance,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 764–775, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. Van den Broeck, N. de Cuyper, H. de Witte, and M. Vansteenkiste, “Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the job demands-resources model,” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 735–759, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. D. M. Zhao and H. Yamaguchi, “Relationship of Challenge and Hindrance Stress with Coping Style and Job satisfaction in Chinese State-Owned Enterprises,” Japanese Journal of Interpersonal and Social Pyschology, vol. 8, pp. 77–88, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  51. C. M. Brotheridge, “A Comparison of Alternative Models of Coping: Identifying Relationships among Coworker Support, Workload, and Emotional Exhaustion in the Workplace,” International Journal of Stress Management, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Vernooij-Dassen, I. Draskovic, J. McCleery, and M. Downs, “Cognitive reframing for carers of people with dementia.,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online), no. 11, p. CD005318, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. Richter, K. Näswall, N. de Cuyper, M. Sverke, H. de Witte, and J. Hellgren, “Coping with job insecurity: Exploring effects on perceived health and organizational attitudes,” Career Development International, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 484–502, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. D. Salin and H. Hoel, “Organisational Causes of Workplace Bullying,” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice, S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, and C. L. Cooper, Eds., Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  55. E. Baillien, A. Rodriguez-Muñoz, A. van den Broeck, and H. de Witte, “Do demands and resources affect target's and perpetrators' reports of workplace bullying? A two-wave cross-lagged study,” Work and Stress, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 128–146, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. D. P. MacKinnon, “Integrating mediators and moderators in research design,” Research on Social Work Practice, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 675–681, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. D. Zapf, “Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work,” International Journal of Manpower, vol. 20, no. 1-2, pp. 70–85, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. R. S. Lazarus, A. DeLongis, S. Folkman, and R. Gruen, “Stress and Adaptational Outcomes. The Problem of Confounded Measures,” American Psychologist, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 770–779, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. I. Reknes, S. Einarsen, S. Pallesen, B. Bjorvatn, B. E. Moen, and N. Magerøy, “Exposure to bullying behaviors at work and subsequent symptoms of anxiety: The moderating role of individual coping style,” Industrial Health, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 421–432, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. J. M. Conway and C. E. Lance, “What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research,” Journal of Business and Psychology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 325–334, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. M. B. Nielsen, G. Notelaers, and S. Einarsen, “Measuring Exposure to Workplace Bullying,” in Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace: Developments in Theory, Research, and Practice, S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, and C. L. Cooper, Eds., Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  62. F. Curtin and P. Schulz, “Multiple correlations and Bonferroni's correction,” Biological Psychiatry, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 775–777, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. J. E. Bartlett, J. W. Kotrlik, and C. C. Higgins, “Organizational Research: Determing Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research,” Information Technology, Learning and Performance Journal, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 43–50, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  64. S. Highhouse and J. Z. Gillespie, “Do samples really matter that much?” in Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban Legends: Doctrine, Verity and Fable in the Organizational and Social Sciences, C. E. Lance and R. J. Vandenberg, Eds., Taylor & Francis Group, New York, NY, USA, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  65. G. Notelaers, J. K. Vermunt, E. Baillien, S. Einarsen, and H. de Witte, “Exploring risk groups workplace bullying with categorical data,” Industrial Health, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 73–88, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. L. B. Finne, S. Knardahl, and B. Lau, “Workplace bullying and mental distress—a prospective study of Norwegian employees,” Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 276–287, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. L. Berkowitz, “Frustration-aggression hypothesis: examination and reformulation,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 59–73, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. W. Van den Brande, E. Baillien, H. De Witte, T. Vander Elst, and L. Godderis, “Do coping strategies moderate the association between work stressors and exposure to workplace bullying?” in Proceedings of the WAOP-conference, pp. 61–71, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus