Research Article

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Assessment of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Subjective Assessment versus Objective Techniques

Table 3

Diagnostic performance of ultrasound in local staging of endometrial cancer in relation to final histological results as reference standard: subjective assessment and objective methods.

Assessment of myometrial invasionSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PPV (95% CI)NPV (95% CI)Accuracy (95% CI)AUC (95% CI) value

(1) Subjective evaluation of myometrial invasion79.3 (69.3–87.3)73.2 (64.4–80.8)67.6 (57.7–76.6)83.3 (74.9–89.9)75.7 (69.3–81.4)0.712 (0.649–0.768)<0.001
(2) Deepest invasion/normal myometrium width69.6 (58.2–79.5)65.9 (56.8–74.2)56.7 (46.3–66.7)77.1 (67.9–84.8)67.3 (60.3–73.5)0.677 (0.608–0.741)<0.001
(3) Tumor/uterine AP diameter56.3 (45.3–66.9)76.4 (67.9–83.6)62.8 (51.1–73.6)71.2 (62.7–78.8)68.1 (61.3–74.3)0.664 (0.595–0.727)<0.001
Assessment of cervical stromal invasion
(4) Subjective evaluation of cervical stromal invasion40.5 (24.8–57.9)94.2 (89.6–97.2)60.0 (38.2–79.2)88.1 (82.5–92.4)84.8 (79.2–89.3)0.694 (0.626–0.757)<0.001
Statistical test
Statistical comparison (1) versus (2) 0.0230.1050.0470.437
Statistical comparison (1) versus (3) <0.0010.6510.0840.309
Statistical comparison (1) versus (4) <0.001<0.0010.0190.687

of predictive power of subjective evaluation versus objective methods in assessment of myometrial invasion and comparison of subjective evaluation of myometrial and cervical stromal invasion (chi-square test); estimates of NPV and PPV were not compared due to their dependence on the prevalence of endpoint; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value; AUC, area under the curve (Receiver Operating Characteristics curves) with corresponding confidence interval and statistical significance ( value).