Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Corrigendum

A corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the corrigendum, please click here.

BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 1373127, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1373127
Research Article

Biomechanical Evaluation of a Tooth Restored with High Performance Polymer PEKK Post-Core System: A 3D Finite Element Analysis

1Department of Prosthodontics, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Department of Conservative Dentistry, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
3Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
4Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Jeong-Yol Lee; rk.ca.aerok@cddw

Received 11 January 2017; Accepted 5 March 2017; Published 12 March 2017

Academic Editor: Andrea Scribante

Copyright © 2017 Ki-Sun Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. R. C. Fraga, B. T. Chaves, G. S. B. Mello, and J. F. Siqueira Jr., “Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots after restoration,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 809–813, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. B. Akkayan and T. Gülmez, “Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 431–437, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Martínez-Insua, L. da Silva, B. Rilo, and U. Santana, “Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 527–532, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. P. Newman, P. Yaman, J. Dennison, M. Rafter, and E. Billy, “Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 360–367, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Okada, H. Miura, C. Suzuki et al., “Stress distribution in roots restored with different types of post systems with composite resin,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 605–611, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Boschian Pest, S. Guidotti, R. Pietrabissa, and M. Gagliani, “Stress distribution in a post-restored tooth using the three-dimensional finite element method,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 9, pp. 690–697, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Nakamura, T. Ohyama, T. Waki et al., “Stress analysis of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with different types of post material,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 145–150, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. De Castro Albuquerque, L. T. De Abreu Polleto, R. H. B. T. S. Fontana, and C. A. Cimini Jr., “Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 30, no. 9, pp. 936–943, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. N. Adanir and S. Belli, “Stress analysis of a maxillary central incisor restored with different posts,” European Journal of Dentistry, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 67–71, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  10. F. Maceri, M. Martignoni, and G. Vairo, “Mechanical behaviour of endodontic restorations with multiple prefabricated posts: a finite-element approach,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 2386–2398, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. Pegoretti, L. Fambri, G. Zappini, and M. Bianchetti, “Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post,” Biomaterials, vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 2667–2682, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Lanza, R. Aversa, S. Rengo, D. Apicella, and A. Apicella, “3D FEA of cemented steel, glass and carbon posts in a maxillary incisor,” Dental Materials, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 709–715, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. N. Cheleux and P. J. Sharrock, “Mechanical properties of glass fiber-reinforced endodontic posts,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 3224–3230, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. L. Sakaguchi and J. M. Powers, Craig's Restorative Dental Materials, Elsevier Health Sciences, 2012.
  15. R. G. Craig and F. A. Peyton, “Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 710–718, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. B. Stawarczyk, P. Jordan, P. R. Schmidlin et al., “PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 1278–1288, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Fuhrmann, M. Steiner, S. Freitag-Wolf, and M. Kern, “Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)—durability and influence of surface conditioning,” Dental Materials, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 357–363, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. M. Toth, M. Wang, B. T. Estes, J. L. Scifert, H. B. Seim III, and A. S. Turner, “Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications,” Biomaterials, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 324–334, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Schwitalla and W.-D. Müller, “PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature,” Journal of Oral Implantology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 743–749, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. M. Kurtz and J. N. Devine, “PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants,” Biomaterials, vol. 28, no. 32, pp. 4845–4869, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. D. Tetelman and C. A. Babbush, “A new transitional abutment for immediate aesthetics and function,” Implant Dentistry, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 51–58, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. F. Tannous, M. Steiner, R. Shahin, and M. Kern, “Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps,” Dental Materials, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 273–278, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. P. R. B. Picanço, F. P. Valarelli, R. H. Cançado, K. M. S. de Freitas, and G. V. Picanço, “Comparison of the changes of alveolar bone thickness in maxillary incisor area in extraction and non-extraction cases: computerized tomography evaluation,” Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 91–98, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. I. Nergiz, P. Schmage, M. Özcan, and U. Platzer, “Effect of length and diameter of tapered posts on the retention,” Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 28–34, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. P.-J. Rodríguez-Cervantes, J.-L. Sancho-Bru, C. González-Lluch, A. Pérez-González, A. Barjau-Escribano, and L. Forner-Navarro, “Premolars restored with posts of different materials: fatigue analysis,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 881–886, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. Y.-L. Lee, Fatigue Testing and Analysis: Theory and Practice, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2005.
  27. I. Krejci, E. Mueller, and F. Lutz, “Effects of thermocycling and occlusal force on adhesive composite crowns,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1228–1232, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Plotino, N. M. Grande, R. Bedini, C. H. Pameijer, and F. Somma, “Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin,” Dental Materials, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1129–1135, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. F. P. Nothdurft, T. Schmitt, P. J. Motter, and P. R. Pospiech, “Influence of fatigue testing and cementation mode on the load-bearing capability of bovine incisors restored with crowns and zirconium dioxide posts,” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 331–336, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. Heydecke, F. Butz, A. Hussein, and J. R. Strub, “Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 438–445, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. W. Komada, H. Miura, D. Okada, and K. Yoshida, “Study on the fracture strength of root reconstructed with post and core: alveolar bone resorbed case,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 177–182, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. W. Chan and R. W. Bryant, “Post-core foundations for endodontically treated posterior teeth,” The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 401–406, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. F. T. Dilmener, C. Sipahi, and M. Dalkiz, “Resistance of three new esthetic post-and-core systems to compressive loading,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 130–136, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Barjau-Escribano, J. L. Sancho-Bru, L. Forner-Navarro, P. J. Rodríguez-Cervantes, A. Pérez-González, and F. T. Sánchez-Marín, “Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: fracture strength and stress distribution,” Operative Dentistry, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. K. Okamoto, T. Ino, N. Iwase et al., “Three-dimensional finite element analysis of stress distribution in composite resin cores with fiber posts of varying diameters,” Dental Materials Journal, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. M. Schmitter, P. Rammelsberg, J. Lenz, S. Scheuber, K. Schweizerhof, and S. Rues, “Teeth restored using fiber-reinforced posts: in vitro fracture tests and finite element analysis,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 3747–3754, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. Sorrentino, R. Aversa, V. Ferro et al., “Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strain and stress distributions in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different post, core and crown materials,” Dental Materials, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 983–993, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Dejak and A. Młotkowski, “Finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of cast posts compared to glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts in anterior teeth,” Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. Naumann, A. Preuss, and R. Frankenberger, “Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts,” Dental Materials, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 138–144, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus