Review Article
Current Therapeutic Options for Heart Failure in Elderly Patients
Table 2
Major randomized clinical trials on HF device therapy and elderly population.
| | Trial | Patients number | Mean age (years) | Patients age ≥ 65 | Patients age > 70 | Primary endpoint RRR (%) | Age interaction |
| ICD | MUSTT [22] | 704 | 67 | | | 55% all-cause mortality 74% arrhythmic mortality | | MADIT II [21] | 1232 | 64 | — | 35% | 31% all-cause mortality | No (<60 versus 60–69 versus ≥70) | DEFINITE [20] | 458 | 58 | 34% | — | 35% all-cause mortality 80% arrhythmic mortality | No (<65 versus ≥65) | DINAMIT [19] | 674 | 61 | | — | NS all-cause mortality 68% arrhythmic mortality | No (<60 versus ≥60) | SCD-HeFT [19] | 2521 | 60 | 23% | — | 35% all-cause mortality | No (<65 versus ≥65) | DANISH [36] | 556 | 64 | | | 13% all-cause mortality (not significant) | Yes (≤59 versus 60–67 versus ≥68) |
| CRT | COMPANION [23] | 1520 | 67 | 56% | | (i) 20% all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization | No (<65 versus ≥65) | CARE-HF [23] | 813 | 66 | | | (i) 37% all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (ii) 36% all-cause mortality | No (<66.4 versus ≥66.4) | RAFT [26] | 1798 | 66 | 57% | — | (i) 25% all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization (ii) 25% all-cause mortality | No (<65 versus ≥65) | MADIT-CRT [23] LBBB subgroup | 1817 | 64 | 53% | | (i) 53% all-cause mortality or HF hospitalization | No (<65 versus ≥65) |
|
|
CRT: cardiac resynchronization therapy; HF: heart failure; ICD: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; NS, nonsignificant; RRR: relative risk reduction.
|