Clinical Study

Real-Time Ultrasound/MRI Fusion for Suprasacral Parallel Shift Approach to Lumbosacral Plexus Blockade and Analysis of Injectate Spread: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial

Table 2

Procedure-related outcomes for ultrasound/MRI fusion guided versus ultrasound guided lumbosacral plexus blockade with the Suprasacral Parallel Shift technique. Values are displayed as median (IQR [range]), number (proportion), or mean (SD).

US

Preparation time; s686 (552–1023 [393–2501])196 (167–228 [105–351])<0.001
Block procedure time; s333 (254–439 [201–1421])216 (176–294 [117–458])0.001
Number of needle insertions4.5 (3.0–7.0 [2.0–24.0])5.0 (3.0–7.0 [2.0–15.0])0.87
Needle insertion point from midline; cm4.0 (4.0–5.0 [2.0–6.0])6.0 (5.0–6.0 [4.0–8.0])<0.001
Needle depth; cm8.0 (7.0–9.0 [5.0–10.0])8.0 (7.0–8.5 [4.0–10.0])0.37
Minimal nerve stimulation; mA0.50 (0.50–0.50 [0.20–0.60])0.50 (0.40–0.50 [0.30–0.50])0.075
Electrical nerve stimulation response0.37
 1 Quadriceps femoris4 (15%)4 (15%)1.00
 2 Adductor0 (0%)1 (4%)1.00
 3 Other motor0 (0%)0 (0%)1.00
 4 Paresthesia2 (8%)0 (0%)0.50
 0 None20 (77%)21 (81%)1.00
Procedural discomfort; NRS 0–2 (1–3 [0–7])3 (2–4 [0–5])0.036
ΔMAP; mmHg§0.23 (12.77)−4.50 (10.44)0.070

: ultrasound.
: magnetic resonance imaging.
: numeric rating scale.
: change in mean arterial pressure from baseline to 5 min after completed injection of local anesthetic.