Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 2476171, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2476171
Research Article

The Impact of Combining a Low-Tube Voltage Acquisition with Iterative Reconstruction on Total Iodine Dose in Coronary CT Angiography

1Radiology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Brussels, Belgium
2Imaging R&D, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, The Grove Centre, Amersham, Buckinghamshire, UK

Correspondence should be addressed to Toon Van Cauteren; eb.ca.buv@neretuac.nav.noot

Received 31 January 2017; Revised 16 March 2017; Accepted 28 March 2017; Published 23 May 2017

Academic Editor: Atsushi Hirayama

Copyright © 2017 Toon Van Cauteren et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Gruberg, G. S. Mintz, R. Mehran et al., “The prognostic implications of further renal function deterioration within 48 h of interventional coronary procedures in patients with pre-existent chronic renal insufficiency,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1542–1548, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Y. Zhao, Z. Tao, Z. Xu et al., “Toxic effects of a high dose of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on renal glomerular and aortic endothelial cells in aged rats in vivo,” Toxicology Letters, vol. 202, no. 3, pp. 253–260, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Seeliger, M. Sendeski, C. S. Rihal, and P. B. Persson, “Contrast-induced kidney injury: mechanisms, risk factors, and prevention,” European Heart Journal, vol. 33, no. 16, pp. 2007–2015, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. G. Marenzi, E. Assanelli, J. Campodonico et al., “Contrast volume during primary percutaneous coronary intervention and subsequent contrast-induced nephropathy and mortality,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 170–177, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. R. Raju, A. G. Thompson, K. Lee et al., “Reduced iodine load with CT coronary angiography using dual-energy imaging: A prospective randomized trial compared with standard coronary CT angiography,” Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 282–288, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Carrascosa, C. Capunay, G. A. Rodriguez-Granillo, A. Deviggiano, J. Vallejos, and J. A. Leipsic, “Substantial iodine volume load reduction in CT angiography with dual-energy imaging: insights from a pilot randomized study,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1613–1620, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. Nakaura, K. Awai, N. Maruyama et al., “Abdominal dynamic CT in patients with renal dysfunction: contrast agent dose reduction with low tube voltage and high tube current-time product settings at 256-detector row CT,” Radiology, vol. 261, no. 2, pp. 467–476, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. T. Bae, “Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches,” Radiology, vol. 256, no. 1, pp. 32–61, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. B. Sigal-Cinqualbre, R. Hennequin, H. T. Abada, X. Chen, and J.-F. Paul, “Low-kilovoltage multi-detector row chest ct in adults: feasibility and effect on image quality and iodine dose,” Radiology, vol. 231, no. 1, pp. 169–174, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. Z. Szucs-Farkas, S. Bensler, J. C. Torrente, J. L. Cullmann, P. Vock, and S. T. Schindera, “Nonlinear three-dimensional noise filter with low-dose CT angiography: effect on the detection of small high-contrast objects in a phantom model,” Radiology, vol. 258, no. 1, pp. 261–269, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. E. Papadakis, K. Perisinakis, M. Raissaki, and J. Damilakis, “Effect of X-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 192–199, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. K. Hara, R. G. Paden, A. C. Silva, J. L. Kujak, H. J. Lawder, and W. Pavlicek, “Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 764–771, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. S. Desai, R. N. Uppot, E. W. Yu, A. R. Kambadakone, and D. V. Sahani, “Impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose in multidetector CT of large body size adults,” European Radiology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1631–1640, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Katsura, I. Matsuda, M. Akahane et al., “Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique,” European Radiology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1613–1623, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Marin, R. C. Nelson, S. T. Schindera et al., “Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm—initial clinical experience,” Radiology, vol. 254, no. 1, pp. 145–153, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Gebhard, T. A. Fuchs, M. Fiechter et al., “Image quality of low-dose CCTA in obese patients: impact of high-definition computed tomography and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1565–1574, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. J. Willemink, T. Leiner, P. A. de Jong et al., “Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 2: initial results in dose reduction and image quality,” European Radiology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1632–1642, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. T. Nakaura, M. Kidoh, N. Sakaino et al., “Low contrast- and low radiation dose protocol for cardiac CT of thin adults at 256-row CT: usefulness of low tube voltage scans and the hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm,” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 913–923, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. N. Buls, G. Van Gompel, T. Van Cauteren et al., “Contrast agent and radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT by a combination of low tube voltage and advanced image reconstruction algorithms,” European Radiology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1023–1031, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Van Cauteren, N. Buls, K. Tanaka, D. Verdries, G. Van Gompel, K. Nieboer et al., Reduced iodine dose in coronary CT angiography by combining low tube voltage acquisition with iterative reconstruction, European Society of Radiology; European Society of Cardiac Radiology, London, UK, 2013.
  21. T. Van Cauteren, N. Buls, K. Tanaka et al., “The impact of combining low-tube voltage scanning with iterative reconstruction on total iodine dose in coronary CT angiography,” in Proceedings of the European Society of Radiology, European Congress of Radiology (ECR '14), Vienna, Austria, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Leipsic, T. M. LaBounty, B. Heilbron et al., “Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 195, no. 3, pp. 649–654, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. A. Clarkson, C. S. Restrepo, T. D. Bauch, and B. J. Rubal, “Using multidetector computed tomography in a swine model to assess the effects of sublingual nitroglycerin and intravenous adenosine on epicardial coronary arteries,” Comparative Medicine, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 573–579, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Smith. C. P., Information Resources on Swine in Biomedical Research, AWIC Resource Series No. 11, United States Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Md, USA, 1990–2000.
  25. A. W. Krazinski, F. G. Meinel, U. J. Schoepf et al., “Reduced radiation dose and improved image quality at cardiovascular CT angiography by automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection: intra-individual comparison,” European Radiology, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2677–2684, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. T. Nakaura, K. Awai, Y. Yanaga et al., “Low-dose contrast protocol using the test bolus technique for 64-detector computed tomography coronary angiography,” Japanese Journal of Radiology, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 457–465, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. K. Kumamaru, M. L. Steigner, S. Soga et al., “Coronary enhancement for prospective ECG-gated single R-R axial 320-MDCT angiography: comparison of 60- and 80-mL iopamidol 370 injection,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 197, no. 4, pp. 844–850, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. W.-L. Zhang, M. Li, B. Zhang et al., “CT angiography of the head-and-neck vessels acquired with low tube voltage, low iodine, and iterative image reconstruction: clinical evaluation of radiation dose and image quality,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e81486, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. Y. Nakayama, K. Awai, Y. Funama et al., “Abdominal CT with low tube voltage: preliminary observations about radiation dose, contrast enhancement, image quality, and noise,” Radiology, vol. 237, no. 3, pp. 945–951, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. J. Siegel, B. Schmidt, D. Bradley, C. Suess, and C. Hildebolt, “Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape,” Radiology, vol. 233, no. 2, pp. 515–522, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. L. J. Zhang, L. Qi, J. Wang et al., “Feasibility of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography with 30 mL iodinated contrast agent at 70 kVp: initial experience,” European Radiology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1537–1546, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. M. Racadio, S. R. Kashinkunti, R. A. Nachabe et al., “Clinically useful dilution factors for iodine and gadolinium contrast material: an animal model of pediatric digital subtraction angiography using state-of-the-art flat-panel detectors,” Pediatric Radiology, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 1491–1501, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. T. Choi, J. Malpeso, D. Li, S. Sourayanezhad, and M. J. Budoff, “Radiation dose reduction with increasing utilization of prospective gating in 64-multidetector cardiac computed tomography angiography,” Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 264–270, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. C. Mihl, J. E. Wildberger, T. Jurencak et al., “Intravascular enhancement with identical iodine delivery rate using different iodine contrast media in a circulation phantom,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 48, no. 11, pp. 813–818, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. M. Kok, C. Mihl, A. Seehofnerová et al., “Automated tube voltage selection for radiation dose reduction in ct angiography using different contrast media concentrations and a constant iodine delivery rate,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 205, no. 6, pp. 1332–1338, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus