Behavioural and Autonomic Regulation of Response to Sensory Stimuli among Children: A Systematic Review of Relationship and Methodology

Table 2

Summary of variations in the Sensory Challenge Protocol (SCP) across the reviewed studies.

Author	Year	Sensory Challenge Protocol description	Presentation
Chang et al.	2012	Modification of the original SCP: (1) addition of standard tone at 84 dB; (2) siren at 78 dB	6 stimuli × 10 trials × 3 s at pseudorandom 12–17 s ISI
Lane et al.	2010	Modification of the original SCP: (1) used a classic steady tone at 78 dB; (2) fire engine at 84 dB	6 stimuli × 10 trials × 3 s at variable 10–17 s ISI
Mangeot et al.	2001	Used the original SCP	5 stimuli × 10 trials × 3 s at pseudorandom 15 or 19 s ISI × 20 s between sensory domains
McIntosh et al.	1999	Used the original SCP	5 stimuli × 10 trials × 3 s at pseudorandom 15 or 19 s ISI × 20 s between sensory domains
Miller et al.	2012	Used the original SCP	5 stimuli × 10 trials × 3 s at pseudorandom 15–19 s ISI × 20 s between sensory domains
Schaaf et al.	2003	Used the original SCP	5 stimuli × 10 trials × 3 s at pseudorandom 12–17 s ISI × 20 s between sensory domains
Schaaf et al.	2010	Modification of the original SCP: (1) addition of a tone at 84 dB; (2) siren at 78 dB; (3) 2-minute auditory tone at 75 dB	7 stimuli × 10 trials × 3 s at pseudorandom 12–17 s ISI × 20 s between sensory domains
Schaaf et al.	2015	Modification of the original SCP: (1) addition of a tone at 84 dB; (2) siren at 78 dB; (3) 2-minute auditory tone at 75 dB	7 stimuli × 10 trials × 3 s at pseudorandom 12–17 s ISI × 20 s between sensory domains
Schoen et al.	2009	Modification of the original SCP: (1) used a classic steady tone at 78 dB; (2) fire engine at 84 dB	6 stimuli × 10 trials × 3 s at variable 10–17 s ISI
Su et al.	2010	Used the original SCP	6 stimuli × 8 trials × 3 s at pseudorandom 12–17 s ISI

Note. ISI = interstimulus interval.