Research Article
Exploring the Potential of Anticipated Regret as an Emotional Cue to Improve Bowel Cancer Screening Uptake
Table 2
Multivariate predictors of future screening intentions.
| | Model | Predictor variables | Levels | Intending to use HST in the future | | Odds ratio | 95% CI |
| | 1 | Anticipated regret | Lower | 1 | — | | Higher | | 2.12, 23.97 | | Sex | Male | 1 | — | | Female | | 1.23, 10.97 | | Previous HST use | No | 1 | — | | Yes | | 0.04, 0.36 | | Health satisfaction | Moderately satisfied | 1 | — | | Satisfied | | 0.10, 0.91 | | Completely satisfied | 0.45 | 0.10, 2.13 |
| | 2 | Anticipated regret | Lower | 1 | — | | Higher | | 2.10, 24.70 | | Sex | Male | 1 | — | | Female | 0.8 | 0.17, 3.82 | | Previous HST use | No | 1 | — | | Yes | | 0.02, 0.23 | | Health satisfaction | Moderately satisfied | 1 | — | | Satisfied | | 0.08, 0.87 | | Completely satisfied | 0.47 | 0.10, 2.36 | | Sex previous HST | N/A | | 1.34, 98.30 |
|
|
eference category for outcome is unsure/no. .
HST = home stool test.
Model 1: −2 log likelihood = 114.09, Nagelkerke .
Model 2: −2 log likelihood = 109.22, Nagelkerke .
|
