BioMed Research International / 2017 / Article / Tab 8 / Research Article
Differentiation of the Follicular Neoplasm on the Gray-Scale US by Image Selection Subsampling along with the Marginal Outline Using Convolutional Neural Network Table 8 Result of various typical inference model.
Predicted_Adenoma Predicted_Carcinoma Overall Accuracy SVM True_Adenoma 18.30% False_Carcinoma 81.70% True negative rate 0.183 40.96% False_Adenoma 22.92% True_Carcinoma 77.08% True positive rate 0.7708 False omission rate 0.4400 Positive predictive value 0.3718 -score: 0.4148 -score: 0.5017 -score: 0.6346 -mean: 0.5354KNN True_Adenoma 91.50% False_Carcinoma 8.50% True negative rate 0.9150 63.45% False_Adenoma 81.25% True_Carcinoma 18.75% True positive rate 0.1875 False omission rate 0.3578 Positive predictive value 0.5806 -score: 0.4091 -score: 0.2835 -score: 0.2169 -mean: 0.3299ANN True_Adenoma 79.08% False_Carcinoma 20.92% True negative rate 0.7908 70.28% False_Adenoma 43.75% True_Carcinoma 56.25% True positive rate 0.5625 False omission rate 0.2577 Positive predictive value 0.6279 -score: 0.6136 -score: 0.5934 -score: 0.5745 -mean: 0.5943Normal Bayes Classifier True_Adenoma 38.56% False_Carcinoma 61.44% True negative rate 0.3856 57.03% False_Adenoma 13.54% True_Carcinoma 86.46% True positive rate 0.8646 False omission rate 0.1805 Positive predictive value 0.4689 -score: 0.5162 -score: 0.6081 -score: 0.7398 -mean: 0.6367