Clinical Study
Can Rehabilitation Influence the Efficiency of Control Signals in Complex Motion Strategies?
Table 2
Comparison of tests’ results prior to and after the rehabilitation therapy in the experimental and control group.
| Variable | Before | After | Relative difference | Absolute difference | Post hoc test | 1 | | 2 | | 1−2 | 1−2(%) | |
| Experimental group |
| Gait speed (m/s) | T1 | 0.63 | 0.03 | 0.79 | 0.05 | −0.16 | 25.40 | 0.001 | T2 | 0.70 | 0.04 | 0.81 | 0.06 | −0.11 | 15.71 | 0.001 | T3 | 0.59 | 0.03 | 0.67 | 0.05 | −0.08 | 13.56 | 0.001 |
| Step length (m) | T1 | 0.36 | 0.04 | 0.43 | 0.07 | −0.07 | 19.44 | 0.002 | T2 | 0.42 | 0.02 | 0.50 | 0.03 | −0.08 | 19.05 | 0.002 | T3 | 0.40 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.03 | −0.04 | 10.00 | 0.003 |
| Frequence (steps/s) | T1 | 1.92 | 0.07 | 1.84 | 0.07 | 0.08 | −4.17 | 0.002 | T2 | 1.64 | 0.06 | 1.62 | 0.06 | 0.02 | −1.22 | 0.020 | T3 | 1.56 | 0.06 | 1.52 | 0.06 | 0.04 | −2.56 | 0.001 |
| Control group |
| Gait speed (m/s) | T1 | 0.64 | 0.05 | 0.61 | 0.05 | 0.03 | −4.69 | 0.06 | T2 | 0.72 | 0.04 | 0.71 | 0.03 | 0.01 | −1.39 | 0.11 | T3 | 0.62 | 0.03 | 0.60 | 0.04 | 0.02 | −3.23 | 0.07 |
| Step length (m) | T1 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 0.32 | 0.04 | 0.02 | −5.88 | 0.32 | T2 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 0.41 | 0.03 | 0.02 | −4.65 | 0.12 | T3 | 0.38 | 0.02 | 0.37 | 0.03 | 0.01 | −2.63 | 0.06 |
| Frequence (steps/s) | T1 | 1.90 | 0.08 | 1.91 | 0.07 | −0.01 | 0.53 | 0.80 | T2 | 1.68 | 0.06 | 1.63 | 0.06 | 0.05 | −2.98 | 0.08 | T3 | 1.57 | 0.05 | 1.59 | 0.06 | −0.02 | 1.27 | 0.06 |
|
|
1: mean of examined variables in the experimental group. 2: mean of examined variables in the control group. : standard deviation : probability ratio.
|