Research Article
Dental Hygiene and Orthodontics: Effect of Ultrasonic Instrumentation on Bonding Efficacy of Different Lingual Orthodontic Brackets
Table 1
Descriptive statistics of shear bond strength values (MPa) of the different groups.
| Group | Code | Bracket | Manufacturer | Condition | Area (mm2) | Mean | SD | Min | Mdn | Max | |
| 1 | VIC | Victory | 3M | Control | 10.8 | 18.80 | 5.67 | 10.09 | 17.33 | 30.60 | A | 2 | VIC + UI | Victory | 3M | Ultrasonic | 10.8 | 18.68 | 4.06 | 9.99 | 18.54 | 24.73 | A | 3 | STB | STB | Ormco | Control | 10.1 | 10.16 | 1.37 | 6.88 | 10.30 | 11.99 | B, C, D | 4 | STB + UI | STB | Ormco | Ultrasonic | 10.1 | 9.06 | 2.65 | 4.93 | 8.75 | 16.17 | B, D | 5 | TTR | TTR | RMO | Control | 7.9 | 20.55 | 4.28 | 12.88 | 20.44 | 28.73 | A, E | 6 | TTR + UI | TTR | RMO | Ultrasonic | 7.9 | 13.30 | 5.07 | 3.68 | 13.47 | 21.62 | C | 7 | ID | Idea | Leone | Control | 9.1 | 12.79 | 3.56 | 9.27 | 11.59 | 20.60 | B, C | 8 | ID + UI | Idea | Leone | Ultrasonic | 9.1 | 6.91 | 1.02 | 5.27 | 7.21 | 8.24 | D | 9 | 2D | 2D | Forestadent | Control | 9.3 | 23.80 | 3.44 | 16.00 | 24.72 | 29.79 | E | 10 | 2D + UI | 2D | Forestadent | Ultrasonic | 9.3 | 19.12 | 4.59 | 11.57 | 18.54 | 28.09 | A |
|
|
significance: groups with the same letter are not significantly different.
|