Research Article

Clinical Results and Serum Metal Ion Concentrations following Ceramic-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty at a Mean Follow-Up of 60 Months

Table 2

Metal ion concentrations, revision rates, and time of follow-up of several studies reporting their results following MoM and CoM THA.

StudyRevision rate (%) Metal ion concentrations (μg/L)Follow-up (months)
CoCr

Large diameter MoM
 Hug et al. [12]1314 (0–150)5 (0–87)36 (12–61)
 Langton et al. [13]63.26 (1.1–32)3.71 (2.4–22)41 (10–57)
 Lavigne et al. [14]01.78 (0.32–7.59)1.78 (0.24–6.20)24
 Reito et al. [15]36Unilateral: 4.2 (0.3–191.7)
Bilateral: 13 (1.5–139.9)
Unilateral: 2.1 (0.4–115)
Bilateral: 3.4 (0.8–61)
 Maurer-Ertl et al. [16]3220.1 (0.3–190.5)12.8 (1.0–89.8)78 (20–98)
 Engh et al. [5]31.010.9560
 Schouten et al. [17]1.571.7312
 Lainiala et al. [4]3.3 (0.3–191.7)1.9 (0.4–114.8)3.4 years (0.6–6.5)
MoM resurfacing
 Hug et al. [12]1212 (0–126)7 (0–60)54 (12–74)
 Langton et al. [13]3.22.74 (0.4–271)4.16 (1.5–69.8)35 (8–57)
 Langton et al. [18]1.31.89 (0.4–228.0)3.61 (0.6–115.0)26 (13–44)
 Reito et al. [15]30Unilateral: 2.3 (0.7–217.7)
Bilateral: 2.4 (0.9–96.9)
Unilateral: 2.0 (0.8–94)
Bilateral: 2.7 (1–54)
 Maurer-Ertl et al. [16]3016.0 (0–171.8)13.1 (0.31–125.0)86 (68–109)
 Lainiala et al. [4]1.3 (0.5–224.7)1.6 (6.4–13.1)4 years (1–6.8)
CoM THA
 Engh et al. [5]1.50.851.1360
 Schouten et al. [17]1.771.8412
 Hill et al. [3]3.10.83 (0.24–27.56)0.78 (0.21–8.84)34 (23–45)
 Yi et al. [7]02.82 ()2.41 ()50
 Kazi et al. [19]1.37 (0.12–10.68)1.09 (0.00–5.51)24
 Isaac et al. [20]0.720.4312
 Cadossi et al. [6]0.78 (0.14–1.67)0.97 (0.11–2.61)36
 Joyce et al. [8]10.718
 Current series73.1 (0.3–15.2)1.6 (0.1–5.5)58 (49–68)