Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Corrigendum

A corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the corrigendum, please click here.

BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 3731983, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3731983
Clinical Study

Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results of Mean 46-Month Follow-Up

1Department of Neurological Surgery, Spine Health Wooridul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine Health Wooridul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

Correspondence should be addressed to Junseok Bae; moc.liamg@dmeabsj

Received 8 November 2016; Revised 30 January 2017; Accepted 6 February 2017; Published 27 February 2017

Academic Editor: William B. Rodgers

Copyright © 2017 Sang-Ho Lee et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. M. Pearson, J. D. Lurie, T. D. Tosteson, W. Zhao, W. A. Abdu, and J. N. Weinstein, “Who should undergo surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis? treatment effect predictors in sport,” Spine, vol. 38, no. 21, pp. 1799–1811, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. W. Bagby, “Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant,” Orthopedics, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 931–934, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. Fan, X. Zhao, F. Zhao, and X. Fang, “Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases,” Spine, vol. 35, no. 17, pp. 1615–1620, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J.-S. Kim, B. Jung, and S.-H. Lee, “Instrumented minimally invasive spinal-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF); minimum 5-years follow-up with clinical and radiologic outcomes,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. Y. Kim, K. T. Kang, D. H. Yoon et al., “Effects of lumbar arthrodesis on adjacent segments: differences between surgical techniques,” Spine, vol. 37, no. 17, pp. 1456–1462, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. Kambin and S. Sampson, “Posterolateral percutaneous suction-excision of herniated lumbar intervertebral discs. Report of interim results,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, no. 207, pp. 37–43, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. R. Morgenstern and C. Morgenstern, “Percutaneous Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (pTLIF) with a posterolateral approach for the treatment of denegerative disk disease: feasibility and preliminary results,” International Journal of Spine Surgery, vol. 27, no. 9, article 41, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. R. Morgenstern, C. Morgenstern, R. Jané, and S.-H. Lee, “Usefulness of an expandable interbody spacer for the treatment of foraminal stenosis in extremely collapsed disks: preliminary clinical experience with endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal approach,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 485–491, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Syed and J.-M. Voyadzis, “True percutaneous transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: case illustrations, surgical technique, and limitations,” Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part A: Central European Neurosurgery, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 344–353, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Y. Wang and J. Grossman, “Endoscopic minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion without general anesthesia: initial clinical experience with 1-year follow-up,” Neurosurgical Focus, vol. 40, no. 2, p. E13, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Xiao, D. Xiong, Q. Zhang et al., “Percutaneous posterior-lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease using a B-Twin expandable spinal spacer,” European Spine Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 325–330, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. Y. Folman, S.-H. Lee, J. R. Silvera, and R. Gepstein, “Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative disc disease using a minimally invasive B-twin expandable spinal spacer: a multicenter study,” Journal of Spinal Disorders and Techniques, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 455–460, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Gepstein, D. Werner, S. Shabat, and Y. Folman, “Percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the B-Twin expandable spinal spacer,” Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 330–333, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. Jacquot and D. Gastambide, “Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?” International Orthopaedics, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1507–1510, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. G. Copay, S. D. Glassman, B. R. Subach, S. Berven, T. C. Schuler, and L. Y. Carreon, “Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales,” Spine Journal, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 968–974, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. A. White III and M. M. Panjabi, Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2nd edition, 1990.
  17. F. Shunwu, Z. Xing, Z. Fengdong, and F. Xiangqian, “Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases,” Spine, vol. 35, no. 17, pp. 1615–1620, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus