Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiological Results of Mean 46-Month Follow-Up

Table 1

Summary of the demographic data and results.

Number	Sex	Age; yrs	Level	Last F/U; months	Diagnosis	Radiological results last F/U; complications and treatment	Satisfaction; last F/U
1	M	28	L5-1	114	FBSS	Stable	Good
2	M	37	L5-1	101	DDD + recurrent HNP	Stable	Good
3	F	50	L4-5	32	DDD	Stable. Limbs of the implant were broken	Fair
4	F	53	L4-5	123	DDD + HNP	Stable. Limbs of the implant were broken	Good
5	M	52	L4-5	27	DDD + HNP	Stable	Excellent
6	M	33	L4-5	26	DDD + HNP	Stable. Limbs of the implant were broken	Excellent
7	F	62	L2-3	78	Degenerative SL	Stable	Good
8	M	47	L5-1	13	FBSS	Stable. Limbs of the implant were broken	Fair
9	F	47	L4-5	12	DDD + HNP	Stable	Fair
10	F	26	L4-5	24	DDD	Stable	Good
11	F	51	L4-5	23	DDD	Stable	Excellent
12	M	54	L4-5	16	DDD + recurrent HNP	Stable	Excellent
13	F	63	L4-5	46	Degenerative SL	Unstable, nonunion	Poor
14	F	26	L4-5	34	DDD + HNP	Stable. Limbs of the implant were broken	Good
15	M	37	L4-5	15	DDD + HNP	Stable	Excellent
16	M	41	L4-5	67	DDD + instability	Stable	Excellent
17	F	52	L4-5	32	DDD	Stable	Excellent
18	M	35	L5-1	—	DDD + HNP	Implant migration, revision with ALIF PPF	—

Note: F/U: follow-up, F: female, M: male, and yrs: years.