Research Article
Mammary and Extramammary Paget’s Disease Presented Different Expression Pattern of Steroid Hormone Receptors
Table 2
Comparison of expression levels of biological markers between MPD and EMPD.
| | | ER | AR | | | Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | | | Number (%) | Number (%) | Number (%) | Number (%) |
| | MPD | 8 (9.09) | 80 (90.91) | 29 (32.95) | 59 (67.05) | | MPD without UBDC | 1 (5.56) | 17 (94.44) | 7 (38.89) | 11 (61.11) | | MPD with UBDC | 7 (10) | 63 (90) | 22 (31.43) | 48 (68.57) | | EMPD | 14 (19.44) | 58 (80.56) | 44 (61.11) | 28 (38.89) | | Penoscrotal | 12 (20) | 48 (80) | 38 (63.33) | 22 (36.67) | | Perianal | 1 (16.67) | 5 (83.33) | 1 (16.67) | 5 (83.33) | | Perineal | 0 (0) | 3 (100) | 3 (100) | 0 (0) | | Inguinal | 0 (0) | 2 (100) | 1 (50) | 1 (50) | | Axillary | 1 (100) | 0 (0) | 1 (100) | 0 (0) |
|
|
Significant difference compared with normal (normal skin tissue from necropsy specimen); UBDC: underling ductal carcinoma of breast.
|
