Research Article
HMMBinder: DNA-Binding Protein Prediction Using HMM Profile Based Features
Table 2
Comparison of performance of the proposed method with other state-of-the-art predictors using jack-knife test on the benchmark dataset.
| Method | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | MCC | auROC |
| iDNAPro-PseAAC | 76.76% | 0.7562 | 0.7745 | 0.53 | 0.8392 | DNABinder (dimension 21) | 73.95% | 0.6857 | 0.7909 | 0.48 | 0.8140 | DNABinder (dimension 400) | 73.58% | 0.6647 | 0.8036 | 0.47 | 0.8150 | DNA-Prot | 72.55% | 0.8267 | 0.5976 | 0.44 | 0.7890 | iDNA-Prot | 75.40% | 0.8381 | 0.6473 | 0.50 | 0.7610 | iDNA-Protdis | 77.30% | 0.7940 | 0.7527 | 0.54 | 0.8310 | PseDNA-Pro | 76.55% | 0.7961 | 0.7363 | 0.53 | ā | Kmer1 + ACC | 75.23% | 0.7676 | 0.7376 | 0.50 | 0.8280 | Local-DPP | 79.20% | 0.8400 | 0.7450 | 0.59 | ā | HMMBinder | 86.33% | 0.8707 | 0.8555 | 0.72 | 0.9026 |
|
|