Research Article

Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

Table 5

Comparison of the treatment changes () in the Twin Block (TB) and activator-headgear (AH) group and untreated controls (CTRL).

TBAHCTRL
Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SD

NSBa−0.1 ± 2.1−0.9 ± 1.6−0.2 ± 2.10.3130.024
SNA−0.4 ± 1.2−0.2 ± 1.20.3 ± 1.50.0870.049
SNB1.1 ± 1.01.2 ± 0.80.6 ± 1.30.0360.066
ANB−1.5 ± 1.3−1.4 ± 0.7−0.3 ± 1.5<0.0010.179
A-NPg−1.2 ± 1.3−1.3 ± 0.9−0.1 ± 1.4<0.0010.161
NL/NSL−0.4 ± 1.9−0.3 ± 1.60.1 ± 2.10.5880.011
MP/NSL−0.0 ± 1.7−0.9 ± 1.7−0.1 ± 2.10.1380.040
MP/NL0.4 ± 2.4−0.7 ± 1.9−0.2 ± 2.60.2830.026
FA/NBa0.2 ± 2.00.3 ± 1.50.3 ± 2.00.9760.001
UFH1.6 ± 2.20.5 ± 4.01.3 ± 1.90.2950.025
LFH3.0 ± 2.41.5 ± 5.11.4 ± 2.60.1190.043
UFH/LFH−1.7 ± 3.2−1.1 ± 3.80.5 ± 5.80.1340.041
Co-A2.0 ± 3.9−0.3 ± 6.71.4 ± 2.40.1140.044
Co-Gn5.1 ± 4.42.5 ± 8.62.6 ± 2.20.0860.049
Max Mand diff3.1 ± 2.92.8 ± 2.31.1 ± 2.20.0010.126
−1/MP3.0 ± 4.40.5 ± 3.6−0.9 ± 3.8<0.0010.145
+1/NSL−7.0 ± 5.3−7.3 ± 6.20.4 ± 4.0<0.0010.378
−1/A-Pg angle5.5 ± 4.82.7 ± 3.8−0.2 ± 3.3<0.0010.283
+1/A-Pg angle−9.6 ± 4.9−10.4 ± 6.1−0.5 ± 3.4<0.0010.528
−1/A-Pg distance2.3 ± 1.31.3 ± 1.1−0.1 ± 1.2<0.0010.416
+1/A-Pg distance−2.9 ± 1.3−3.6 ± 2.20.2 ± 1.1<0.0010.592
Gl′-Sn-Pg′−2.1 ± 3.0−2.0 ± 2.90.4 ± 2.3<0.0010.182
Cm-Sn-Ls1.2 ± 11.06.1 ± 10.02.9 ± 9.50.2070.032
Li-E−0.6 ± 1.8−0.9 ± 1.9−0.3 ± 1.60.2900.025
Ls-E−1.8 ± 1.8−1.8 ± 1.3−0.4 ± 1.2<0.0010.205
Li-S−0.4 ± 1.8−0.8 ± 2.0−0.1 ± 1.60.2120.032
Ls-S−1.5 ± 1.7−1.9 ± 1.1−0.0 ± 1.4<0.0010.261
OJ−5.2 ± 1.6−4.9 ± 2.60.3 ± 1.2<0.0010.712

ANOVA with Student-Newman-Keuls post hoc tests. Groups in the same row that share the same superscript letter do not differ significantly.
Effect size calculated according to formula: = between groups sum of squares/total sum of squares. Cohen criteria for interpretation of effect size were used: = 0.02–0.13 = small effect size, 0.13–0.26 = medium, and >0.26 = large.