Research Article

Morphological Asymmetry of the Superior Cervical Facets from C3 through C7 due to Degeneration

Table 4

Relationship between the asymmetry in facet degeneration and the asymmetry in facet morphology of the superior facets joints C3–C7.

Correlations between difference in morphology L-R and difference in degeneration L-RTotal facet surface
Pearson Correlation ()
Significance (2-tailed) ()
Recognizable joint surface
Pearson Correlation ()
Significance (2-tailed) ()

Difference in dimensions and difference in degeneration
Anteroposterior distance0,7 ()0,207 ()
Mediolateral distance0,5 ()0,195 ()
Anteromedial-posterolateral distance0,6 ()0,3 ()
Anterolateral-posteromedial distance0,6 ()0,3 ()
Surface area0,7 ()0,191 ()

Difference in curvature and difference in degeneration
Facet depth in anteroposterior direction0,029 ()−0,045 ()
Facet depth in anteroposterior direction/anteroposterior distance−0,054 ()−0,042 ()
Facet depth in mediolateral direction0,2 ()−0,026 ()
Facet depth in mediolateral direction/mediolateral distance0,2 ()0,013 ()

Significance level: ,001.