Review Article

Intestinal Barrier Disturbances in Haemodialysis Patients: Mechanisms, Consequences, and Therapeutic Options

Table 1

Studies reporting circulating endotoxin in HD patients.

StudyPatients ()Detection methodHD patients endotoxin concentrations (reported as mean ± SD or median-range)Control group endotoxin concentrationsTiming of Blood Samples (before, during, or after HD)

[15]50LAL assay (gel clot)76.30 ± 42.09 pg/mLN/AAfter HD
[9]306LAL assay (chromogenic)2.31 ± 3.10 EU/mLN/ANot reported
[24]50LAL assay (chromogenic)0.69 ± 0.30 EU/mL0.04 ± 0.01 EU/ml (n = 15) [25].Before HD and after HD
[16]25LAL assay (chromogenic)0.302 ± 0.083 EU/mL and 0.209 ± 0.044 EU/mL (before and after 4 weeks of conversion to ultrapure dialysate)N/ANot reported
[26]86LAL assay (chromogenic)0.66 ± 0.29 EU/mL and 0.08 ± 0.04 EU/mL (for conventional and nocturnal HD patients)N/ABefore HD
[27]10LAL assay (chromogenic)5.4 pg/dL before HD and 4.63 pg/dL after HDN/ABefore HD and after HD
[8]66LAL assay (chromogenic) 0.64 EU/mL~0.045 EU/ml (n = 14)Not reported
[28]59LAL assay (chromogenic)0.58 EU/mL (0.51–0.60) and 0.60 EU/mL (0.51–0.63) (before randomisation to sevelamer hydrochloride or calcium acetate)N/ABefore HD
[12]31LAL assay (chromogenic)40 ± 4.7 ng/L7 ± 0.6 ng/L (n = 99)Not reported
[29]20LAL assay (gel clot)0.5 to 5.0 pg/mL in 18 samplesN/ADuring febrile episodes on HD
[30]211LAL assay (chromogenic)0.65 (0.43–1.16) EU/mLN/ABefore HD
[31]46LAL assay (chromogenic)0.23 ± 0.01 and 0.30 ± 0.01 (patients taking sevelamer and those not)N/ABefore HD
[32]58LAL assay (turbidimetric kinetic)0.17 ± 0.11, 0.28 ± 0.15, 0.45 ± 0.16 EU units
N/ABefore HD and after HD
[33]17Laser scattering photometry0.23 EU/mL start of HD and 0.37 EU/mL end of HDN/ADuring HD
[13]87LAL assay (chromogenic)Significant endotoxaemia detected in 6/87 HD patients (27.67 ± 23.56 pg/mL)5.3 ± 1.1 pg/mL (n = 22)During HD