Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 6840592, 9 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6840592
Research Article

Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study

1Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Women’s Clinic, Sodersjukhuset, Sweden
2Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
3Department of Public Health and Nursing, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
4Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence should be addressed to Eva Wiberg-Itzel; moc.ailet@lezti.ave

Received 16 May 2017; Revised 11 July 2017; Accepted 25 July 2017; Published 18 September 2017

Academic Editor: Andrea Tinelli

Copyright © 2017 Tove Wallstrom et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. Alkema, D. Chou, D. Hogan et al., “Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: a systematic analysis by the un Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group,” The Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10017, pp. 462–474, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. Z. Alfirevic, N. Aflaifel, and A. Weeks, “Oral misoprostol for induction of labour,” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, vol. 6, p. CD001338, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. WHO, Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  4. R. A. Irani and S. Foster, “Overview of the mechanisms of induction of labor,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 426–429, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. L. Mozurkewich, J. L. Chilimigras, D. R. Berman et al., “Methods of induction of labour: a systematic review,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 11, article no. 84, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. L. G. Ten Eikelder, K. Oude Rengerink, M. Jozwiak et al., “Induction of labour at term with oral misoprostol versus a Foley catheter (PROBAAT-II): a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial,” The Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10028, pp. 1619–1628, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. S. Ennen, J. A. Bofill, E. F. Magann, J. D. Bass, S. P. Chauhan, and J. C. Morrison, “Risk factors for cesarean delivery in preterm, term and post-term patients undergoing induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix,” Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 113–117, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. V. A. Danilack, E. W. Triche, D. D. Dore, J. H. Muri, M. G. Phipps, and D. A. Savitz, “Comparing expectant management and spontaneous labor approaches in studying the effect of labor induction on cesarean delivery,” Annals of Epidemiology, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 405.e1–411.e1, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M.-A. Davey and J. King, “Caesarean section following induction of labour in uncomplicated first births- a population-based cross-sectional analysis of 42,950 births,” BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, vol. 16, no. 1, article no. 92, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. P. Vogel, H. M. West, and T. Dowswell, “Titrated oral misoprostol for augmenting labour to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.,” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, vol. 9, p. CD010648, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Tang, N. Kapp, M. Dragoman, and J. P. de Souza, “WHO recommendations for misoprostol use for obstetric and gynecologic indications,” International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, vol. 121, no. 2, pp. 186–189, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. L. Stephenson and D. A. Wing, “Misoprostol for induction of labor,” Seminars in Perinatology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 459–462, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. J. Hofmeyr, “Oral misoprostol is as safe as Foley catheter for labour induction...or is it?” The Lancet, vol. 387, no. 10028, pp. 1593-1594, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. A. Aronsson, M. Bygdeman, and K. Gemzell-Danielsson, “Effects of misoprostol on uterine contractility following different routes of administration,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 81–84, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. C. N. Läkemedelsverket, Användning av misoprostol för förlossningsinduktion.pdf.
  16. F. K. Aghideh, P. M. Mullin, S. Ingles et al., “A comparison of obstetrical outcomes with labor induction agents used at term,” The Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 592–596, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. M. G. Crane, B. Butler, D. C. Young, and M. E. Hannah, “Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: A systematic review,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 113, no. 12, pp. 1366–1376, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. S. Mehrotra, U. Singh, and H. P. Gupta, “A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction,” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 461–464, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Prager, E. Eneroth-Grimfors, M. Edlund, and L. Marions, “A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 115, no. 11, pp. 1443–1450, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. S. Kehl, C. Weiss, U. Dammer et al., “Induction of labour: change of method and its effects,” Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 238–243, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. N. Jahromi, F. Poorgholam, G. Yousefi, and L. Salarian, “Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for the induction of labor at term: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial,” Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 79–85, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Jozwiak, K. O. Rengerink, M. Benthem et al., “Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 378, no. 9809, pp. 2095–2103, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Thorsell, S. Lyrenas, E. Andolf, and M. Kaijser, “Induction of labor and the risk for emergency cesarean section in nulliparous and multiparous women,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 1094–1099, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. Z. Alfirevic, E. Keeney, T. Dowswell et al., “Methods to induce labour: a systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 1462–1470, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus