Research Article
Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Table 1
Maternal and fetal background data, presented per method of induction. Data are presented as numbers (%) or mean (SD).
.
| Maternal | Misoprostol () | Dinoproston () | Amniotomy () | Balloon catheter () | Oxytocin () | Dinoproston () | value |
| Age (year) | 33.9 (5.0) | 33.3 (5.0) | 33.1 (5.0) | 32.7 (5.0) | 33.1 (4.9) | 32.7 (5.4) | <0.001 | Parity (primiparous%) | 1039 (62) | 574 (62) | 348 (46) | 205 (62) | 147 (64) | 51 (63) | <0.001 | BMI (kg/m2) | 24.5 (4.4) | 24.7 (4.5) | 24.4 (4.7) | 24.0 (4.0) | 24.1 (4.3) | 24.0 (5.1) | 0.13 | Maternal reason for induction () | | | | | | | <0.001 | PE (%, ) | 158 (9) | 46 (5) | 27 (4) | 5 (1.5) | 3 (1.5) | 8 (10) | | ICP | 41 (2.5) | 11 (1) | 10 (1.5) | 9 (2.5) | 1 (0.5) | 1 (1) | | (%, ) | Diabetes (%) | 24 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | (1.5) | (1) | (1) | | | (1) | HT (%, ) | 19 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | | (1) | (1) | (1) | (0.5) | | | Others (%, ) | 42 (2.5) | 132 (14) | 60 (8) | 37 (11) | 4 (2) | 15 (19) | | Fetal reason for induction () | | | | | | | <0.001 | Oligohydramnion (%, ) | 158 | 46 | 30 | 14 | 0 | 6 | | (9) | (5) | (4) | (4) | | (7) | DFM (%, ) | 41 | 11 | 31 | 8 | 0 | 1 | | (2.5) | (1) | (4) | (2) | | (1) | IUGR (%, ) | 24 (1.5) | 11 (1) | 10 (1.5) | 2 (0.5) | 3 (1) | 11 (14) | | CTG (%, ) | 19 (1) | 9 (1) | 19 (2.5) | 1 (0.5) | 0 | 3 (4) | | Others (%, ) | 42 (2.5) | 132 (14) | 15 (2) | 7 (2) | 1 (0.5) | 14 (17) | | Gestational age (days) | 282 (12) | 284 (13) | 284 (11) | 283 (12) | 275 (12) | 276 (13) | <0.001 | Gender (boys) | 921 (55) | 504 (54) | 414 (55) | 173 (52) | 130 (57) | 40 (49) | 0.8 | Years of induction | | | | | | | | 2009-2010 | 0 | 922 | 471 | 300 | 144 | 61 | | 2012-2013 | 1675 | 10 | 282 | 33 | 84 | 20 | |
|
|
, , and values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. . cholestasis. . fetal movements. growth retardation; abnormal CTG.
|