Research Article
Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Table 2
Bishop score, indications for induction, and labor outcome data, presented per method of induction. Data are presented as numbers (%) or mean (SD).
| | | Misoprostol
() | Dinoproston
() | Amniotomy
() | Balloon catheter
() | Oxytocin
() | Dinoproston () | value |
| Bishop score
(0–10) | 3
(2) | 3
(1) | 7
(1) | 5
(1) | 7
(1) | 3
(2) | <0.001 | | Indications for induction | | | | | | | | Postdate pregnancies
(%, ) | 473
(28.0) | 314
(34.0) | 208
(28.0) | 87
(26.0) | 7
(3.0) | 4
(5.0) | <0.001 | PROM
(%, ) | 374
(22.5) | 168
(18.0) | 52
(7.0) | 92
(28.0) | 193
(85.0) | 7
(9.0) | | Maternal reason
(%, ) | 284
(17) | 209
(22.0) | 111
(15.0) | 53
(16.0) | 8
(3.5) | 25
(31.0) | | Fetal reason
(%, ) | 292
(17.5) | 90
(10.0) | 105
(14.0) | 29
(9.0) | 4
(2.0) | 35
(43.0) | | Nonmedical reason
(%, ) | 252
(15.0) | 151
(16.0) | 277
(37.0) | 72
(22.0) | 16
(7.0) | 10
(12.0) | | | Time from induction to delivery (h) | | | | | | | <0.001 | | (i) Vaginal | 19 | 19 | 8 | 11 | 9 | 2 | | | (ii) CS | 26 | 25 | 12 | 14 | 13 | 17 | Vaginal delivery in 24 h
(VD24, %) | 1010
(60.0) | 487
(52.0) | 642
(85.0) | 249
(75.0) | 195
(86.0) | 26
(32.0) | 0.014 | | Way of delivery (%) | | | | | | | <0.001 | | (i) Vaginal | 1367
(82.0) | 642
(69.0) | 647
(86.0) | 251
(75.0) | 28
(12.0) | 43
(53.0) | | | (ii) CS | 308
(18.0) | 291
(31.0) | 106
(14.0) | 82
(25.0) | 200 (88.0) | 38
(47.0) | PPH > 1500 ml
(, %) | 81
(5.0) | 44
(5.0) | 29
(4.0) | 18
(5.5) | 7
(3.0) | 3
(4.0) | 0.4 | Apgar < 7,5′
(, %) | 16 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0.04 | | (1.0) | (1.0) | (0.5) | (1.0) | | | pH < 7.10
(, %) | 59 | 30 | 29 | 4 | 5 | 0 | <0.001 | | (3.5) | (3.0) | (4.0) | (1.0) | (2.0) | |
|
|
, , and values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. 41 w. rupture of the membranes. partum hemorrhage.
|
