Journals
Publish with us
Publishing partnerships
About us
Blog
BioMed Research International
Journal overview
For authors
For reviewers
For editors
Table of Contents
Special Issues
BioMed Research International
/
2017
/
Article
/
Tab 1
/
Clinical Study
Midterm Results of a New Rotating Hinge Knee Implant: A 5-Year Follow-Up
Table 1
Patient characteristics and differences between primary and revision group. Except where indicated otherwise, values presented are mean (standard deviation).
Total
Primary
Revision
value
(%)
50
24 (48%)
26 (52%)
Female
(%)
40 (80%)
22 (91.7%)
18 (69.2%)
p = 0.048
Age
73 (1)
74.7 (2)
72 (1.7)
Weight (kg)
82 (3)
79 (3)
85 (4)
Height (cm)
165 (1)
164 (2)
167 (2)
BMI
29.9 (0.9)
29.5 (1.1)
30.4 (1.4)
CCI
6 (0)
7 (0)
6 (0)
RA
(%)
3 (6%)
2 (8.3%)
1 (3.8%)
DM
(%)
12 (24.5%)
6 (26.1%)
6 (23.1%)
Hospitalization (days)
18
17 (1)
19 (1)
Indications
(%)
Primary
24 (48%)
—
—
Septic loosening
10 (20%)
—
10 (38.5%)
Aseptic loosening
11 (22%)
—
11 (42.3%)
Instability
5 (10%)
—
5 (19.2%)
Complications (all)
11 (22%)
1 (4.2%)
10 (38.5%)
p = 0.003
Type 1
4 (8%)
0
4 (15.4%)
Type 2
3 (6%)
1 (4.2%)
2 (7.7%)
Type 3
4 (8%)
0
4 (15.4%)