Review Article

Quality of Spine Surgery Research from the Arab Countries: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis

Table 1

Comparison of different parameters related to the collected data and their statistical significance.

FeatureArticles numberLOE (%)LOE meanCI 95% value
IIIIIIIVV

Country
Egypt11408 (7%)80 (70.2%)24 (21.1%)2 (1.8%)3.18(−2.01–8.91)0.014 (S)
Other3202 (0.63%)9 (2.8%)81 (25.3%)217 (67.8%)11 (3.44%)3.7
Year
2000–200815104 (2.65%)46 (30.46%)97 (64.24%)4 (2.65%)3.67(1.19–6.01)0.18 (NS)
2009–20152832 (0.71%)13 (4.60%)115 (40.64%)144 (50.89%)9 (3.18%)3.51
IF
≥11462 (1.37%)8 (5.48%)52 (35.62%)82 (56.16%)2 (1.37%)3.51(0.18–6.94)0.08 (NS)
<128809 (3.13%)109 (37.85%)159 (55.21%)11 (3.82%)3.6
Study LOE
High level (I, II)192 (10.5%)17 (89.5%)0001.89(−7.04–12.58)0.0007 (S)
Low level (I, IV, V)41500160 (38.6%)242 (58.3%)13 (3.13%)3.65

IF: impact factor; LOE: level of evidence; S: significant; NS: not significant.