Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 7659893, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7659893
Clinical Study

ArmAssist Robotic System versus Matched Conventional Therapy for Poststroke Upper Limb Rehabilitation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

1Clinic for Rehabilitation “Dr. Miroslav Zotović”, Faculty of Medicine, University Belgrade, Sokobanjska 13, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2Tecnalia Serbia Ltd., Vladetina 13 and Signals and Systems Department, School of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Bulevar kralja Aleksandra 73, 11200 Belgrade, Serbia
3Neurorehabilitation Area at the Health Division of TECNALIA, San Sebastian, Spain

Correspondence should be addressed to Ljubica M. Konstantinović; moc.oohay@civonitnatsnokjl

Received 1 November 2016; Revised 15 December 2016; Accepted 12 January 2017; Published 31 January 2017

Academic Editor: Erwin van Wegen

Copyright © 2017 Tijana J. Dimkić Tomić et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. L. Feigin, C. M. M. Lawes, D. A. Bennett, and C. S. Anderson, “Stroke epidemiology: a review of population-based studies of incidence, prevalence, and case-fatality in the late 20th century,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, J. van der Grond, and A. J. H. Prevo, “Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke,” Stroke, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 2181–2186, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. D. S. Nichols-Larsen, P. C. Clark, A. Zeringue, A. Greenspan, and S. Blanton, “Factors influencing stroke survivors' quality of life during subacute recovery,” Stroke, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 1480–1484, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. B. Wyller, J. Holmen, P. Laake, and K. Laake, “Correlates of subjective well-being in stroke patients,” Stroke, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 363–367, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Langhorne, R. Wagenaar, and C. Partridge, “Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better?” Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 75–88, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. W. Teasell, N. C. Foley, S. K. Bhogal, and M. R. Speechley, “An evidence-based review of stroke rehabilitation,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 29–58, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. H. Zhang, H. Austin, S. Buchanan, R. Herman, J. Koeneman, and J. He, “Feasibility studies of robot-assisted stroke rehabilitation at clinic and home settings using RUPERT,” in Proceedings of the Rehab Week Zurich—IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR '11), Zurich, Switzerland, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Mazzoleni, P. Sale, M. Tiboni, M. Franceschini, M. C. Carrozza, and F. Posteraro, “Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in chronic and subacute stroke patients: a kinematic analysis,” American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. e26–e37, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, and H. I. Krebs, “Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Mehrholz, M. Pohl, T. Platz, J. Kugler, and B. Elsner, “Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke,” Cochrane Database Systematic Review, no. 11, Article ID CD006876, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  11. M. Sivan, J. Gallagher, S. Makower et al., “Home-based Computer Assisted Arm Rehabilitation (hCAAR) robotic device for upper limb exercise after stroke: results of a feasibility study in home setting,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 11, no. 1, article no. 163, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Rodriguez-De-Pablo, S. Balasubramanian, A. Savic, T. D. Tomic, L. Konstantinovic, and T. Keller, “Validating ArmAssist Assessment as outcome measure in upper-limb post-stroke telerehabilitation,” in Proceedings of the 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC '15), pp. 4623–4626, IEEE, Milano, Italy, August 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. J. Gladstone, C. J. Danells, and S. E. Black, “The Fugl-meyer assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 232–240, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. J. K. Harrison, K. S. McArthur, and T. J. Quinn, “Assessment scales in stroke: clinimetric and clinical considerations,” Clinical Interventions in Aging, vol. 8, pp. 201–211, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. R. Fugl Meyer, L. Jaasko, and I. Leyman, “The post stroke hemiplegic patient. I. A method for evaluation of physical performance,” Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–31, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Sanford, J. Moreland, L. R. Swanson, P. W. Stratford, and C. Gowland, “Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke,” Physical Therapy, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 447–454, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. L. Wolf, P. A. Thompson, D. M. Morris et al., “The EXCITE trial: attributes of the Wolf Motor Function Test in patients with subacute stroke,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 194–205, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. M. Morris, G. Uswatte, J. E. Crago, E. W. Cook III, and E. Taub, “The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 750–755, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Uyttenboogaart, R. E. Stewart, P. C. A. J. Vroomen, J. De Keyser, and G.-J. Luijckx, “Optimizing cutoff scores for the Barthel Index and the modified Rankin Scale for defining outcome in acute stroke trials,” Stroke, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1984–1987, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. M. Wylie and B. K. White, “A measure of disability,” Archives of Environmental Health, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 834–839, 1964. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. Mehrholz, A. Hädrich, T. Platz, J. Kugler, and M. Pohl, “Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 6, Article ID CD006876, 2012. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. W.-W. Liao, C.-Y. Wu, Y.-W. Hsieh, K.-C. Lin, and W.-Y. Chang, “Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 111–120, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Masiero, M. Armani, and G. Rosati, “Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 355–366, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. P. Sale, M. Franceschini, S. Mazzoleni, E. Palma, M. Agosti, and F. Posteraro, “Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 11, no. 1, article 104, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. S. Hesse, A. Heß, C. Werner C, N. Kabbert, and R. Buschfort, “Effect on arm function and cost of robot-assisted group therapy in subacute patients with stroke and a moderately to severely affected arm: a randomized controlled trial,” Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 637–647, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. K. Salter, J. W. Jutai, R. Teasell, N. C. Foley, and J. Bitensky, “Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF body functions,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 191–207, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Dodakian, K. G. Sharp, J. See et al., “Targeted engagement of a dorsal premotor circuit in the treatment of post-stroke paresis,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus