Clinical Study
A Comparison of the Device-Related Complications of Intramedullary Lengthening Nails Using a New Classification System
Table 3
Device-related complication.
| Complication | ISKD
| PRECICE1
| PRECICE2
|
| Ia | 18 (51%) | | 1 (2.2%) | Runaway nail: 6 Difficult to distract nail: 12 | | Running back | Ib | 4 (12%) | 2 (5.9%) | 1 (2.2%) | Nondistracting nail: 3 Failure of lengthening mechanism: 1 | Dense regenerated callus | Nonfunctioning nail | Ic | | | |
| Total type I | 22 (63%) | 2 (5.9%) | 2 (5.9%) |
| IIa | 3 (8.6%) | 3 (8.8%) | 19 (41%) | Nail bending without breakage: 2 | Nail bending without breakage | Nail bending without breakage: 7 | Breakage of rotation coupling without instability: 1 | | Breakage of rotation coupling without instability: 12 | IIb | | 1 (2.9%) | 2 (4.3%) | Nail breakage | Rotational stability | IIc | | | |
| Total type II | 3 (8.6%) | 4 (11.8%) | 21 (46%) |
| III | | | |
|
|
Note. Actually, Type III (other device-related complications) complication was not observed.
|