Review Article
Sciatic Nerve Palsy following Total Hip Replacement: Are Patients Personal Characteristics More Important than Limb Lengthening? A Systematic Review
Table 4
Prognosis of sciatic nerve injuries.
| Authors | Number of sciatic injuries | Follow-up | % complete lesions | Type of lesion | % full recovery |
| Weber | | 1 Year | | N.A. | | Edwards | | Mean 2.7 years | N.A. | 12 peroneal, 11 sciatic | | Schmalzried | | 12–198 ms | | 26 peroneal, 19 sciatic, 3 tibial | N.C. | Simon et al. | | N.C. | | N.A. | | Nercessian | | Minimum 2 years | N.A. | 23 peroneal, 6 sciatic | | Navarro | | 1–2,5 years | N.A. | 6 peroneal, 1 sciatic | | Oldenburg | | Mean 107 months (11 to 240) | N.A. | 33 peroneal, 13 sciatic | N.C. | Pekkarinen | | Mean 58 months (24 to 110) | | 11 peroneal, 15 sciatic, 1 tibial | | Farrell | | Mean 6 years (0.2–21 ys | | 30 peroneal, 14 sciatic | | Park | | Mean 44,3 ms (3.7–114.4 ms | | 26 peroneal, 4 sciatic | | Zappe | | Mean 93 | | N.A. | |
|
|
deficit was followed until complete recovery or at least 2 years; N.A.: not available; N.C.: not clear.
|