Research Article

Prognostic Analysis for Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Table 3

Demography of angiographic findings and clinical outcome.

CharacteristicsShock (%)Without shock (%) value

Follow-up time (weeks)<0.001
Number of diseased vessel0.285
 Single vessel disease18 (34.0)168 (39.2)
 Dual vessel disease16 (30.2)151 (35.2)
 Triple vessel disease19 (35.8)110 (25.6)
Mean of treated vessels0.612
Mean of treated lesions0.805
Lesion location
 LAD42 (79.2)335 (78.1)0.847
 LCX31 (58.5)237 (55.2)0.654
 RCA35 (66.0)232 (54.1)0.098
SYNTAX score<0.001
LVEF0.387
Type of intervention
 Balloon angioplasty12 (22.6)128 (29.8)0.276
 BMS deployment28 (52.8)200 (46.6)0.393
 DES deployment16 (30.2)155 (36.1)0.394
RMI0.657
 Yes5 (9.4)33 (7.7)
 No48 (90.6)396 (92.3)
CV death<0.001
 Yes18 (34.0)43 (10.0)
 No35 (66.0)386 (90.0)
All-cause death<0.001
 Yes21 (39.6)74 (17.2)
 No32 (60.4)355 (82.8)
Re-PCI0.501
 Yes16 (30.2)111 (25.9)
 No37 (69.8)318 (74.1)

LAD: left anterior descending artery; Lcx: left circumflex artery; RCA: right coronary artery; SYNTAX score: Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; BMS: bare-metal stent; DES: drug-eluting stent; RMI: recurrent myocardial infarction; CV death: cardiovascular death; Re-PCI: repeated percutaneous coronary intervention. Median (maximum-minimum).